Revision of Business Content on Corporate Social Responsibility
Measuring the Impact of Training on the Cognitive Effort of Second-Language University Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.vi62.132262Keywords:
corporate social responsibility, text revision, second-language writing, plain language training, cognitive effort, keystroke logging, retrospective interviewsAbstract
With more and more people interested in how sustainable and socially responsible companies are, the comprehensibility of content on corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become paramount. Producing easy-to-read business content – either by writing it from scratch or revising it – is a cognitively demanding undertaking, especially for second-language non-professional writers. Both formal training and sustained practice can help writers build expertise and, in turn, be considerate of their intended audience. In particular, research on the impact of training has usually yielded positive results when examining the texts produced following specific instruction. However, the extent to which training has a positive effect on the process of writing and revision is still under-researched, especially in second language. To address this gap, we report on an experimental study that examines the impact of reader-oriented training on the cognitive effort experienced by 47 second-language university students when revising CSR content. We adopted a pre-test post-test design, and we used keystroke logging and retrospective interviews to collect data on students' pausing behaviour, use of online sources, and strategies to approach the revision task. Our training seemed to reduce the cognitive effort linked with lexical choices. Furthermore, it provided some students with procedural knowledge on how to approach the revision task in a more efficient way. We also observed a general tendency to rewrite (rather than revise) CSR content despite the higher cognitive effort required by rewriting. We discuss implications for training, limitations, and future research avenues.
References
Allal, Linda/Chanquoy, Lucile 2004: Introduction: Revision Revisited. In Allal, Linda/Chanquoy, Lucile/Largy, Pierre (eds.), Revision Cognitive and Instructional Processes. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1048-1_1
Arias Badia, Blanca/Matamala Ripoll, Anna 2020: Audio Description Meets Easy-to-Read and Plain Language: Results from a Questionnaire and a Focus Group in Catalonia. In Zeitschrift für Katalanistik 33, 251-270. http://www.romanistik.uni-freiburg.de/pusch/zfk/33/13_Arias-Badia_Matamala.pdf
Baaijen, Veerle/Galbraith, David/De Glopper, Kees 2012: Keystroke Analysis: Reflections on Procedures and Measures. In Written Communication 29(3), 246-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312451108
Barkaoui, Khaled 2016: What and When Second‐Language Learners Revise when Responding to Timed Writing Tasks on the Computer: The Roles of Task Type, Second Language Proficiency, and Keyboarding Skills. In The Modern Language Journal 100(1), 320-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12316
Barkaoui, Khaled 2007: Revision in Second Language Writing: What Teachers Need to Know. In TESL Canada Journal 25(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v25i1.109
Becker, Anne 2006: A Review of Writing Model Research Based on Cognitive Processes. In Horning, Alice/Becker, Anne (eds.), Revision: History, Theory, and Practice. West Lafayette, Indiana: Parlor Press, 25-49. https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/horning_revision/chapter3.pdf
Carter, Michael 1990: The Idea of Expertise: An Exploration of Cognitive and Social Dimensions of Writing. In College Composition and Communication 41(3), 265-286. https://doi.org/10.2307/357655
Chukharev-Hudilainen, Evgeny/Saricaoglu, Aysel/Torrance, Mark/Feng, Hui-Hsien 2019: Combined Deployable Keystroke Logging and Eyetracking for Investigating L2 Writing Fluency. In Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41(3), 583-604. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311900007X
Conijn, Rianne/Dux Speltz, Emily/Chukharev-Hudilainen, Evgeny 2021: Automated Extraction of Revision Events from Keystroke Data. In Reading and Writing, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10222-w
Eden, Rick/Mitchell, Ruth 1986: Paragraphing for the Reader. In College Composition and Communication 37(4), 416-441. https://doi.org/10.2307/357912
Faigley, Lester/Witte, Stephen 1981: Analyzing Revision. In College Composition and Communication 32(4), 400-414. https://doi.org/10.2307/356602
Federici, Federico/Cadwell, Patrick 2018: Training Citizen Translators: Design and Delivery of Bespoke Training on the Fundamentals of Translation for New Zealand Red Cross. In Translation Spaces 7(1), 20-43. https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.00002.fed
Golob, Urša/Podnar, Klement 2019: Researching CSR and Brands in the Here and Now: An Integrative Perspective. In Journal of Brand Management 26, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-018-0112-6
Greer, Rachelle 2012: Introducing Plain Language Principles to Business Communication Students. In Business and Professional Communication Quarterly 75(2), 136-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569912441967
Hall, Chris 1990: Managing the Complexity of Revising Across Languages. In Tesol Quarterly 24(1), 43-60. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586851
Hall, Sophie/Baaijen, Veerle/Galbraith, David 2022: Constructing Theoretically Informed Measures of Pause Duration in Experimentally Manipulated Writing. In Reading & Writing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10284-4
Hayes, John 2012: Modeling and Remodeling Writing. In Written Communication 29(3), 369-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312451260
Hayes, John 2004: What Triggers Revision? In Allal, Linda/Chanquoy, Lucile/Largy, Pierre (eds.), Revision Cognitive and Instructional Processes. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1048-1_2
Hayes, John/Flower, Linda/Schriver, Karen/Stratman, James/Carey, Linda 1987: Cognitive Processes in Revision. In Rosenberg, Sheldon (ed.), Advances in Applied Psycholinguistics: Reading, Writing, and Language Learning (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 176-240.
Jackson, Tanner/Allen, Laura/McNamara, Danielle 2016: Common Core TERA: Text Ease and Readability Assessor. In Crossley, Scott/McNamara, Danielle (eds.), Adaptive Educational Technologies for Literacy Instruction. New York: Routledge, 49-68.
Janssen, Daniël 2001: Improving the Quality of Public Documents or: Why Training Public Writers Often Doesn’t Work. In Janssen, Daniël/Neutelings, Rob (eds.), Reading and Writing Public Documents. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 105-130. https://doi.org/10.1075/ddcs.1.06jan
Kellogg, Ronald 2008: Training Writing Skills: A Cognitive Developmental Perspective. In Journal of Writing Research 1(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2008.01.01.1
Kellogg, Ronald/Olive, Thierry/Piolat, Annie 2007: Verbal, Visual, and Spatial Working Memory in Written Language Production. In Acta Psychologica 124(3), 382-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.02.005
Kim, Minkyung/Crossley, Scott 2018: Modeling Second Language Writing Quality: A Structural Equation Investigation of Lexical, Syntactic, and Cohesive Features in Source-Based and Independent Writing. In Assessing Writing 37, 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.002
Kobayashi, Hiroe/Rinnert, Carol 2001: Factors Relating to EFL Writers' Discourse Level Revision Skills. In International Journal of English Studies 1(2), 71-101.
Kools, Marieke/Ruiter, Robert/Van De Wiel, Margaretha/Kok, Gerjo 2008: The Effects of Headings in Information Mapping on Search Speed and Evaluation of a Brief Health Education Text. In Journal of Information Science 34(6), 833-844. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551508089719
Koponen, Maarit 2016: Is Machine Translation Post-Editing Worth the Effort? A Survey of Research into Post-Editing and Effort. In The Journal of Specialised Translation 25, 131-148. https://www.jostrans.org/issue25/art_koponen.pdf
Kuteeva, Maria 2011: Wikis and Academic Writing: Changing the Writer–Reader Relationship. In English for Specific Purposes 30, 44-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2010.04.007
Lee, Vivian (2016). Considerations of Relevance to the Target Reader in Korean into English Translation. In Asia Pacific Translation and Intercultural Studies 3(1), 62-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/23306343.2015.1131880
Leijten, Mariëlle/Van Waes, Luuk 2013: Keystroke Logging in Writing Research: Using Inputlog to Analyze and Visualize Writing Processes. In Written Communication 30(3), 358-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313491692
Leijten, Mariëlle/Van Waes, Luuk 2020: Designing Keystroke Logging Research in Writing Studies. In Chinese Journal of Second Language Writing 1(1), 18-39.
Leijten, Mariëlle/Van Horenbeeck, Eric/Van Waes, Luuk 2019: Analysing Keystroke Logging Data from a Linguistic Perspective. In Lindgren, Eva/Sullivan, Kirk (eds.), Observing Writing. Leiden: Brill, 71-95. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392526_005
Leijten, Mariëlle/Van Waes, Luuk/Schrijver, Iris/Bernolet, Sarah/Vangehuchten, Lieve 2019: Mapping Master's Students' Use of External Sources in Source-Based Writing in L1 and L2. In Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41(3), 555-582. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000251
Lindgren, Eva/Leijten, Mariëlle/Van Waes, Luuk 2011: Adapting to the Reader during Writing. In Written Language & Literacy 14(2), 188-223. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.2.02lin
Lindgren, Eva/Sullivan, Kirk 2006: Analysing Online Revision. In Lindgren, Eva/Sullivan, Kirk (eds.), Computer Key-Stroke Logging and Writing. Leiden: Brill, 157-188. https://doi.org/10.1163/9780080460932_010
Lu, Xiaojun/Révész, Andrea 2021: Revising in a Non-Alphabetic Language: The Multi-Dimensional and Dynamic Nature Of Online Revisions in Chinese as a Second Language. In System 100, 102544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102544
Matthews, Bob/Ross, Liz 2010: Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social Sciences. London: Pearson Education Ltd.
McCutchen, Deborah 2011: From Novice to Expert: Implications of Language Skills and Writing-Relevant Knowledge for Memory during the Development of Writing Skill. In Journal of Writing Research 3(1), 51-68. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2011.03.01.3
McCutchen, Deborah 2000: Knowledge, Processing, and Working Memory: Implications for a Theory of Writing. In Educational Psychologist 35(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_3
Nilipour, Azadeh/De Silva, Tracy-Anne/Li, Xuedong 2020: The Readability of Sustainability Reporting in New Zealand over Time. In Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal 14(3), 86-107. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v14i3.7
Olive, Thierry 2012: Working Memory in Writing. In Berninger, Virginia Wise (ed.), Past, Present, and Future Contributions of Cognitive Writing Research to Cognitive Psychology. New York: Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 485-503.
Olive, Thierry/Alves, Rui Alexandre/ Castro, São Luís 2009: Cognitive Processes in Writing during Pause and Execution Periods. In European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 21(5), 758-785. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440802079850
Piolat, Annie/Roussey, Jean-Yves/Olive, Thierry/Amada, Murielle 2004: Processing Time and Cognitive Effort in Revision: Effects of Error Type and of Working Memory Capacity. In Allal, Linda/Chanquoy, Lucile/Largy, Pierre (eds.), Revision Cognitive and Instructional Processes. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1048-1_3
Révész, Andrea/Michel, Marije/Lee, Minjin 2019: Exploring Second Language Writers' Pausing and Revision Behaviors: A Mixed-Methods Study. In Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41(3), 605-631. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311900024X
Rijlaarsdam, Gert/Braaksma, Martine/Couzijn, Michel/Janssen, Tanja/Raedts, Mariet/Van Steendam, Elke/Toorenaar, Anne/Van den Bergh, Huub 2008: Observation of Peers in Learning to Write. Practice and Research. In Journal of Writing Research 1(1), 53-83. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2008.01.01.3
Rossetti, Alessandra/Van Waes, Luuk 2022: Accessible Communication of Corporate Social Responsibility: Development and Preliminary Evaluation of an Online Module. In Business Professional and Communication Quarterly 85(1), 52-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906221074324
Sagi, Doron/Spitzer-Shohat, Sivan/Schuster, Michal/Daudi, Ligat/Rudolf, Mary Catharine 2021: Teaching Plain Language to Medical Students: Improving Communication with Disadvantaged Patients. In BMC Medical Education 21(407), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02842-1
Schoonen, Rob/Snellings, Patrick/Stevenson, Marie/Van Gelderen, Amos 2009: Towards a Blueprint of the Foreign Language Writer: The Linguistic and Cognitive Demands of Foreign Language Writing. In Manchón, Rosa (ed.), Writing in Foreign Language Contexts: Learning, Teaching, and Research. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 77-101. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691859-007
Schrijver, Iris/Van Vaerenbergh, Leona/Leijten, Mariëlle/Van Waes, Luuk 2016: The Impact of Writing Training on Transediting in Translation, Analyzed from a Product and Process Perspective. In Perspectives 24(2), 218-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2015.1040034
Schriver, Karen 2017: Plain Language in the US Gains Momentum: 1940–2015. In IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 60(4), 343-383. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2017.2765118
Schriver, Karen 2012: What We Know about Expertise in Professional Communication. In Berninger, Virginia Wise (ed.), Past, Present, and Future Contributions of Cognitive Writing Research to Cognitive Psychology. New York: Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 275-312.
Schriver, Karen 1992: Teaching Writers to Anticipate Readers' Needs: A Classroom-Evaluated Pedagogy. In Written Communication 9(2), 179-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088392009002001
Sengupta, Sima 2000: An Investigation into the Effects of Revision Strategy Instruction on L2 Secondary School Learners. In System 28(1), 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00063-9
Shen, Cuiping/Chen, Ningyang 2021: Profiling the Pausing Behaviour of EFL Learners in Real-Time Computer-Aided Writing: A Multi-Method Case Study. In Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 6(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-021-00118-1
Smeuninx, Nils/De Clerck, Bernard/Aerts, Walter 2020: Measuring the Readability of Sustainability Reports: A Corpus-Based Analysis through Standard Formulae and NLP. In International Journal of Business Communication 57(1), 52-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416675456
Suzuki, Manami 2008: Japanese Learners' Self Revisions and Peer Revisions of Their Written Compositions in English. In Tesol Quarterly 42(2), 209-233. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00116.x
Terryn, Ayla/Robert, Isabelle/Ureel, Jim/Remael, Aline/Hanoulle, Sabien 2017: Conceptualizing Translation Revision Competence: A Pilot Study on The Acquisition of The Knowledge about Revision and Strategic Subcompetences. In Across Languages and Cultures 18(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1556/084.2017.18.1.1
Van Waes, Luuk/Leijten, Mariëlle 2015: Fluency in Writing: A Multidimensional Perspective on Writing Fluency Applied to L1 and L2. In Computers and Composition 38, 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.012
Van Waes, Luuk/Leijten, Mariëlle/Van Weijen, Daphne 2009: Keystroke Logging in Writing Research: Observing Writing Processes with Inputlog. In German as a Foreign Language 2, 41-64.
Van Waes, Luuk/Van Weijen, Daphne/Leijten, Mariëlle 2014: Learning to Write in an Online Writing Center: The Effect of Learning Styles on the Writing Process. In Computers & Education 73, 60-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.009
Vandermeulen, Nina/Leijten, Mariëlle/Van Waes, Luuk 2020: Reporting Writing Process Feedback in the Classroom Using Keystroke Logging Data to Reflect on Writing Processes. In Journal of Writing Research 12(1), 109-139. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.12.01.05
Wallace, David/Hayes, John 1991: Redefining Revision for Freshmen. In Research in the Teaching of English 25, 54-66.
Warde, Fiona/Papadakos, Janet/Papadakos, Tina/Rodin, Danielle/Salhia, Mohammad/Giuliani, Meredith 2018: Plain Language Communication as a Priority Competency for Medical Professionals in a Globalized World. In Canadian Medical Education Journal 9(2), e52-e59. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6044302/
Wei, Lewen 2020: Examining Corporate Communications of Environmental Responsibility on Corporate Websites: Main Themes, Linguistic Features, and Text Reuse. In Journal of Promotion Management 26(7), 1013-1037. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2020.1746467
Whyatt, Bogusława 2018: Testing Indicators of Translation Expertise in an Intralingual Task. In HERMES-Journal of Language and Communication in Business 57, 63-78. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v0i57.106194
Xu, Ting Sophia/Zhang, Lawrence Jun/Gaffney, Janet 2021: Examining the Relative Effects of Task Complexity and Cognitive Demands on Students' Writing in a Second Language. In Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000310
Yasuda, Sachiko 2011: Genre-Based Tasks in Foreign Language Writing: Developing Writers’ Genre Awareness, Linguistic Knowledge, and Writing Competence. In Journal of Second Language Writing 20(2), 111-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.03.001
Zamir, Farah/Saeed, Abubakr 2020: Location Matters: Impact of Geographical Proximity to Financial Centers on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure in Emerging Economies. In Asia Pacific Journal of Management 37(1), 263-295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9619-3
Zhang, Fan/Hashemi, Homa/Hwa, Rebecca/Litman, Diane 2017: A Corpus of Annotated Revisions for Studying Argumentative Writing. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). Stroudsburg: The Association for Computational Linguistics, 1568-1578. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P17-1144
Zhao, Huahui 2010: Investigating Learners’ Use and Understanding of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Writing: A Comparative Study in a Chinese English Writing Classroom. In Assessing Writing 15(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Dr. Rossetti, Professor van Waes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
