With a “Licence to Adapt”: Translation Shifts in Subsidiary Corporate Value Statements

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.vi62.129439

Keywords:

applied linguistics, international corporate communication, corporate values, discourse analysis, intercultural business communication, multilingual multinational corporations, translation

Abstract

When organisations implement corporate values as a managerial tool, the Corporate Value Statement (CVS) is a central piece of corporate communication. Nevertheless, little research has been done on the linguistic aspect of the CVS in international settings. In this article, I study the case of Keolis, a French multinational corporation that empowers subsidiaries to translate and adapt the Group’s CVS to local business contexts, resulting in radically rewritten subsidiary versions. I propose a linguistic and discourse analytical approach to identify translation shifts between the headquarters’ CVS in English, and local versions in Denmark and in India. I also investigate which contextual and cultural factors may have contributed to these shifts. Findings suggest that subsidiaries use the value terms as vessels to be filled with corporate content of their choice. Contributing to a translatorial turn in international business and organisation studies, this paper illustrates how applied linguistics may inform management practice.

References

Barmeyer C and Davoine E (2013) « Traduttore, Traditore » ? La réception contextualisée des valeurs d’entreprise dans les filiales françaises et allemandes d’une entreprise multinationale américaine. Management international / International Management / Gestiòn Internacional 18(1).

Bjørge AK and Whittaker S (2015) Corporate values: A linguistic approach. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management 15(3). SAGE Publications UK: London, England: 347–362. DOI: 10.1177/1470595815606742.

Bjørge AK, Sandvik AM and Whittaker S (2017) The recontextualisation of values in the multilingual workplace. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 22(3): 401–416. DOI: 10.1108/CCIJ-09-2016-0062.

Brannen MY (2004) When mickey loses face: Recontextualization, semantic fit, and the semiotics of foreignness. Academy of Management Review 29(4): 593–616. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2004.14497613.

Brannen MY, Piekkari R and Tietze S (2014) The multifaceted role of language in international business: Unpacking the forms, functions and features of a critical challenge to MNC theory and performance. Journal of International Business Studies 45: 495–507. DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2014.24.

Cambridge English Dictionary (2022) Adapt. Available at: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/adapt (accessed 10 October 2022).

Chidlow A, Plakoyiannaki E and Welch C (2014) Translation in cross-language international business research: Beyond equivalence. Journal of International Business Studies 45(5). Springer: 562–582.

Chong M (2007) The Role of Internal Communication and Training in Infusing Corporate Values and Delivering Brand Promise: Singapore Airlines’ Experience. Corporate Reputation Review 10(3). Palgrave Macmillan UK: 201–212. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550051.

Ciuk S and James P (2015) Interlingual translation and the transfer of value-infused practices: An in-depth qualitative exploration. Management Learning 46(5): 565–581. DOI: 10.1177/1350507614560304.

Conaway RN and Wardrope WJ (2010) Do their words really matter? Thematic analysis of U.S. and Latin American CEO letters. Journal of Business Communication 47(2): 141–168. DOI: 10.1177/0021943610364523.

d’Iribarne P (1989) La Logique de l’honneur : Gestion Des Entreprises et Traditions Nationales. Sociologie. Paris: Seuil.

d’Iribarne P (2012) Managing Corporate Values in Diverse National Cultures : The Challenge of Differences. Routledge studies in management, organizations, and society. London: Routledge.

Darics E and Koller V (2019) Social Actors “to Go”: An Analytical Toolkit to Explore Agency in Business Discourse and Communication. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly 82(2): 214–238. DOI: 10.1177/2329490619828367.

Gertsen MC and Zølner M (2012a) Reception and recontextualization of corporate values in subsidiaries. In: Global Collaboration: Intercultural Experiences and Learning. Springer, pp. 137–150.

Gertsen MC and Zølner M (2012b) Recontextualization of the Corporate Values of a Danish MNC in a Subsidiary in Bangalore. Group & Organization Management 37(1). SAGE Publications CA: Los Angeles, CA: 101–132. DOI: 10.1177/1059601111432747.

Halliburton C and Ziegfeld A (2009) How do major European companies communicate their corporate identity across countries? - An empirical investigation of corporate internet communications. Journal of Marketing Management 25(9–10): 909–925. DOI: 10.1362/026725709X479291.

Halliday MAK and Matthiessen CMIM (2014) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th ed. London: Arnold.

Helin S and Sandström J (2008) Codes, Ethics and Cross-Cultural Differences: Stories from the Implementation of a Corporate Code of Ethics in a MNC Subsidiary. Source: Journal of Business Ethics 82(2): 281–291. DOI: 10.1007/sl0551-008-9887-9.

Höög CN (2015) Värdegrundstexter – ett nytt slags uppdrag för klarspråksarbetet? Sakprosa 7(2): 16. DOI: 10.5617/sakprosa.831.

Höög CN (2017) Texts at work: The construction of an ideal workplace in ‘platforms of values’. Discourse Studies - Ways and Crossroads Brós K and Kowalski G (eds). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Publishing Group: 231–245. Available at: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:du-29215.

Höög CN and Björkvall A (2018) Keeping the Discussion Among Civil Servants Alive: ‘Platform of Values’ as an Emerging Genre Within the Public Sector in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 22(3). The Century Co: 342. Available at: http://ojs.ub.gu.se/ojs/index.php/sjpa/article/view/3899 (accessed 11 March 2019).

House J (2019) Translation as a Prime Player in Intercultural Communication. Applied Linguistics 41(1): 10–29. DOI: 10.1093/applin/amz007.

House RJ, Hanges PJ, Javidan M, et al. (2004) Culture, Leadership , and Organizations. The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE.

Jakobson R (1959) On Linguistic Aspects of Translation. In: Brower RA (ed.) On Translation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, pp. 232–239. DOI: 10.1515/9783110873269.260.

Kim M and Matthiessen CMIM (2017) Ways to move forward in translation studies.: 11–26. DOI: 10.1075/bct.94.01kim.

Koller V (2011) ‘Hard-working, team-oriented individuals’: Constructing professional identities in corporate mission statements. Constructing Identities at Work: 103–126. DOI: 10.1057/9780230360051.

Koller V (2012) How to analyse collective identity in discourse:Textual and contextual parameters. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines 5(2): 19–38.

Koskinen K (2008) Translating Institutions. An Ethnographic Study of EU Translation. Manchester, UK & Kinderhook (NY), USA: St. Jerome Publishing.

Kreiner GE (2016) Tabula Geminus. A ‘Both/And’ Approach to Coding and Theorizing. In: Elsbach KD and Kramer RM (eds) Handbook Qualitative Research. Innovative Pathways and Methods. Taylor and Francis, pp. 350–361.

Landrieu V (2016) Comment Keolis est devenu mondial. Les Echos EXECUTIVES, 3 October. Available at: https://business.lesechos.fr/directions-generales/strategie/organisation-des-entreprises/0211328952779-comment-keolis-est-devenu-mondial-300499.php (accessed 2 October 2019).

Logemann M and Piekkari R (2015) Localize or local lies? The power of language and translation in the multinational corporation. Critical Perspectives on International Business 11(1): 30–53. DOI: 10.1108/cpoib-02-2014-0011.

Massey G and Wieder R (2019) Quality Assurance in Translation and Corporate Communications. In: Huertas Barros E, Vandepitte S, and Iglesias Fernanàndez E (eds) Quality Assurance and Assessment Practices in Translation and Interpreting. Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies Series. Hershey PA: IGI Global, pp. 57–87. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-5225-3.ch003.

Massey G and Wieder R (2021) Harnessing a Hidden Power – International Corporate Communications , Translators and Translatorial Agency. In: Short paper reviewed for and presented at the 14th GEM&L International Workshop on Management & Language. Global working and language: Towards an understanding of global-local interplay in context, EM Strasbourg Business School (Online), 10-12 May 2021, 2021.

Merriam-Webster (2021a) Imagination. Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/imagination (accessed 12 November 2021).

Merriam-Webster (2021b) Imagine. Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/imagine (accessed 12 November 2021).

Piekkari R, Tietze S and Koskinen K (2019) Metaphorical and Interlingual Translation in Moving Organizational Practices Across Languages. Organization Studies: 1–22. DOI: 10.1177/0170840619885415.

Pollach I (2005) Corporate self-presentation on the WWW: Strategies for enhancing usability, credibility and utility. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 10(4): 285–301. DOI: 10.1108/13563280510630098.

Rheinhardt A, Kreiner GE, Gioia DA, et al. (2018) Conducting and publishing rigorous qualitative research. The sage handbook of qualitative business and management research methods. Sage London, UK: 515–531.

Rike SM (2013) Bilingual corporate websites-from translation to transcreation? The Journal of Specialised Translation (20). Available at: https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/191092/Rike_2013_Bilingual.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed 10 February 2019).

Sproget.dk (2021) Hvad er en sætning? Available at: https://sproget.dk/raad-og-regler/typiske-problemer/komma/kommagrammatik/hvad-er-en-saetning (accessed 10 November 2021).

Sverdrup TE and Ly A (2022) The role of recontextualization and socialization practices in transferring corporate values from a small Norwegian IT company to an Indian subsidiary. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 0(0). Routledge: 1–32. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2022.2119596.

Tietze S (2008) International Management and Language. New York: Routledge.

Tréguer-Felten G (2014) Rhétorique et traduction des discours de communication corporate. In: Jullion M-C and Cattani P (eds) Le Lingue, Le Culture e La Traduzione per La Mediazione : Prospettive Didattiche e Di Ricerca / Les Langues, Les Cultures et La Traduction Pour La Médiation : Perspectives d’enseignement et de Recherche. Torino, Paris: Harmattan Italia, pp. 48–36.

Tréguer-Felten G (2017) The role of translation in the cross-cultural transferability of corporate codes of conduct. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management 17(1). SAGE Publications: 137–149. DOI: 10.1177/1470595817694659.

Westney DE, Piekkari R, Koskinen K, et al. (2022) Crossing borders and boundaries: Translation ecosystems in international business. International Business Review 31(5). Elsevier Ltd: 102030. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2022.102030.

Wierzbicka A (2003) Cross-Cultural Pragmatics : The Semantics of Human Interaction. 2nd ed. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Zethsen KK (2009) Intralingual translation: An attempt at description. Meta 54(4): 795–812. DOI: 10.7202/038904ar.

Zølner M (2019) Local intermediaries and their organisational identification in a French subsidiary. European Journal of International Management 13(1): 88–110. DOI: 10.1504/EJIM.2019.096504.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-16

How to Cite

Schrøder, V. S. N. (2022). With a “Licence to Adapt”: Translation Shifts in Subsidiary Corporate Value Statements. HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business, (62), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.vi62.129439