When the Translator Does More than Translate: A Case Study of Translator Roles in a Digital Publishing Initiative
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v0i58.111678Keywords:
roles; professional boundaries; digital translations; materiality; status; communities of practice.Abstract
Recent technological changes have affected translators’ professional boundaries and status. However, scant attention has been paid to the new opportunities that have been created for professional literary translators. Our research focuses on ¡Hjckrrh!, a de facto non-profit self-publishing initiative led by three professional translators who are involved in the publishing of literary translations in ebook format – they share the same professional expertise, but assume different roles in the initiative. An ethnography-inspired qualitative method has been adopted by the researchers. This paper is based on fourteen interviews with participants who have collaborated with ¡Hjckrrh!, comprising eleven translators (including the three founding members of ¡Hjckrrh!), two proofreaders and a graphic designer. The paper aims at studying translators’ roles, production teams and relationships, and pays special attention to the agency and visibility of translators. Our findings show that technology has had a positive impact on translator agency, status and identity among the founding members and collaborators of ¡Hjckrrh!. These translators have used the shifting professional boundaries and technological advances to develop their roles as cultural mediators. The article describes the work of the translators who collaborate in this digital initiative and discusses the ways they relate to each other, the roles they play and how they cross professional boundaries. The conclusions identify the relationships and opportunities created by this new work environment.
References
Buzelin, Hélène 2004: La traductologie, l’ethnographie et la production des connaissances. In Meta 49 (4), 729–746.
Buzelin, Hélène 2005: Unexpected Allies: How Latour’s Network Theory Could Complement Bourdieusian Analyses in Translation Studies. In The Translator 11 (2), 193–218.
Buzelin, Hélène 2007a: Translations ‘in the Making’. In Wolf, Michaela/Fukari, Alexandra (eds.), Constructing a Sociology of Translation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 135–169.
Buzelin, Hélène 2007b: Translation Studies, Ethnography and the Production of Knowledge. In St-Pierre, Paul/Kar, Prafulla C. (eds.), Translation – Reflections, Refractions, Transformation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 39–56.
Chesterman, Andrew 2009: The Name and Nature of Translator Studies. In Hermes – Journal of Language and Communication Studies 42, 13–22.
Coldiron, Anne, E.B. 2012: Visibility Now: Historicizing Foreign Presences in Translation. In Translation Studies 5 (2), 189–200.
Cronin, Michael 2003: Translation and Globalization. London: Routledge.
Dam, Helle V./Zethsen, Karen Korning 2009: Translation Studies: Focus on the Translator. In Hermes – Journal of Language and Communication Studies 42, 7–12.
D’Hayer, Danielle 2012: Public Service Interpreting and Translation: Moving Towards a (Virtual) Community of Practice. In Meta 57 (1), 235–247.
Dickinson, Jules Carole 2010: Interpreting in a Community of Practice a Sociolinguistic Study of the Signed Language Interpreter’s Role in Workplace Discourse. PhD thesis, Heriot-Watt University [online]. http://hdl.handle.net/10399/2387 (accessed 09 May 2017).
Emmerich, Karen R. 2013: Visibility (and invisibility). In Gambier, Yves/van Doorslaer, Luc (eds.), Handbook of Translation Studies: Volume 4. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 200–206.
Fox, Stephen 2000: Communities of Practice, Foucault and Actor-Network Theory. In Journal of Management Studies 37 (6), 853–867.
Gambier, Yves/van Doorslaer, Luc (eds.) 2010-2017: Subject index. Handbook of Translation Studies Online [online]. https://benjamins.com/online/hts2/list/jats-subjects (accessed 10 May 2017).
Gieryn, Thomas F. 1983: Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. In American Sociological Review 48 (6), 781–795.
Grbić, Nadja 2010: “Boundary work” as a concept for studying professionalization processes in the interpreting field. In Translation and Interpreting Studies 5(1), 109–123.
Hale, Sandra 2007: Community Interpreting. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave McMillan.
Hale, Sandra 2008: Controversies over the Role of the Court Interpreter. In Valero-Garcés, Carmen/Martin, Anne (eds.), Crossing Borders in Community Interpreting: Definitions and Dilemmas. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 99–121.
Hayles, N. Katherine 2008: Electronic Literature: New Horizons for the Literary. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
Hewson, Lance/Martin, Jacky 1991: Redefining Translation: The Variational Approach. London/New York: Routledge.
Ingold, Tim 2008: Anthropology is Not Ethnography. In Proceedings of the British Academy 154. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 69–92.
Jones, Francis R. 2009: Literary Translation. In Baker, Mona/Saldanha, Gabriela (eds.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, 2nd edition. London/New York: Routledge, 152–157.
Katan, David 1999: Translating Cultures: An Introduction for Translators, Interpreters and Mediators. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
Katan, David 2016: Translation at the Cross-roads: Time for the Transcreational Turn? In Perspectives, 24 (3), 365–381.
Koskinen, Kaisa 2000: Beyond Ambivalence – Postmodernity and the Ethics of Translation. Academic dissertation. University of Tampere. Tampere: Acta electronica universitatis tamprerensis.
Koskinen, Kaisa 2006: Going into the Field: Ethnographic Methods in Translation Studies. In Wolf, Michaela (ed.), Übersetzen - Translating - Traduire: Towards a “Social Turn”? Münster/ Hamburg: Lit Verlag, 109–118.
Koskinen, Kaisa 2010: Agency and Causality: Towards Explaining by Mechanisms in Translation Studies. In Kinnunen, Tuija/Koskinen, Kaisa (eds.), Translators’ Agency. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
Koskinen, Kaisa/Dam, Helle V. 2016: Academic Boundary Work and the Translation Profession: Insiders, Outsiders and (Assumed) Boundaries. In The Journal of Specialised Translation 25, 254–267.
Latour, Bruno 1991: Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Paris: La Découverte.
Lave, Jean/Wenger, Etienne 1991: Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lin, Chi-Lien 2012: Estudio estilístico contrastivo de las seis traducciones al chino de Platero y yo. PhD thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona [online]. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/96414 (accessed 10 May 2017).
Littau, Karin 1997: Translation in the Age of Postmodern Production: From Text to Intertext to Hypertext. In Forum for Modern Language Studies 33 (1), 81–96.
Littau, Karin 2011: First Steps Towards a Media History of Translation. In Translation Studies 4 (3), 261–281.
McKnight, Cliff/Dillon, Andrew/Richardson, John 1992: Hypermedia. In Kent, Allen (ed.) Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, Vol. 50, New York: Marcel Dekker, 226–255.
Mayring, Philipp 2000: Qualitative Content Analysis. In Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1 (2) [online]. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2386 (accessed 10 May 2017).
Nord, Christiane 1991: Text Analysis in Translation: Theory, Methodology and Didactic Application of a Model for Translation-Oriented Text Analysis. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.
O’Hagan, Minako/Ashworth, David 2002: Translation-Mediated Communication in a Digital World: Facing the Challenges of Globalization and Localization. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Peña, Salvador 1997: El traductor en su jaula: hacia una pauta de análisis de traducciones. In Morillas, Esther/Arias, Juan Pablo (eds.), El papel del traductor. Salamanca: Colegio de España, 19–57.
Pressman, Jessica 2008: Navigating Electronic Literature. In Hayles, N. Katherine, Electronic Literature: New Horizons for the Literary [online]. http://newhorizons.eliterature.org/essay.php@id=14.html (accessed 10 May 2017).
Risku, Hanna/Dickinson, Angela 2009: Translators as Networkers: The Role of Virtual Communities. In Hermes – Journal of Language and Communication Studies 42, 49–70.
Sela-Sheffy, Rakefet/Shlesinger, Miriam (eds.) 2011: Identity and Status in the Translational Professions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Sela-Sheffy, Rakefet 2016: Profession, Identity and Status. In Angelelli, Claudia V./ Baer, Brian James (eds.), Researching Translation and Interpreting. Milton Park/New York: Routledge, 131–145.
Smith, Mark K. 2003: Communities of Practice. The Encyclopedia of Informal Education [online]. www.infed.org/biblio/communities_of_practice.htm (accessed 10 May 2017).
Somers, Harold (ed.) 2003: Computers and Translation: A Translator’s Guide. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Venuti, Lawrence 1995: The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation. London: Routledge.
Wadensjö, Cecilia 1998: Interpreting as Interaction. London: Longman.
Wenger, Etienne 1999: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger-Trayner, Etienne/Wenger-Trayner, Beverly 2015: Communities of practice: a brief introduction [online]. http://wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice/ (accessed 25 November 2017).
Wolf, Michaela 2002: Culture as Translation – and Beyond: Ethnographic Models of Representation in Translation Studies. In Hermans, Theo (ed.), Crosscultural Transgressions: Research Models in Translation Studies II: Historical and Ideological Issues. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing, 180–192.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
