Glass Ceilings in the State: Gender and Discretionary Appointments in Brazil’s Federal Bureaucracy

Main Article Content

Nayara Albrecht
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2613-6438

Abstract

This study investigates the intersection of gender and political affiliation in Brazil’s federal bureaucracy, focusing on discretionary appointments to high-level positions within ministerial departments. Drawing on data from the SIAPE system (1999–2018) and employing logistic regression models, it analyses the influence of gender, race, partisan affiliation, ties to the public sector, and education on appointments to levels 5, 6, and 7. The findings reveal that gender and political affiliation are pivotal factors: women are significantly underrepresented at higher hierarchical levels, with their likelihood of appointment decreasing at levels 6 and 7. Conversely, partisan affiliation increases the probability of securing these positions, underscoring the enduring role of political patronage in Brazil’s coalition presidential system. The study highlights the dual challenges of gender bias and political opportunism in achieving equitable representation in public administration. While the presence of women in level 5 roles has increased, their progression to higher positions remains constrained by structural and cultural barriers. This research contributes to the discourse on representative bureaucracy by providing empirical evidence on the gendered dynamics of political appointments. It advocates for policies to address these disparities, including transparent selection processes and measures promoting gender equality, ultimately enriching governance and policymaking in Brazil.

Article Details

How to Cite
Albrecht, N. (2026). Glass Ceilings in the State: Gender and Discretionary Appointments in Brazil’s Federal Bureaucracy. Brasiliana: Journal for Brazilian Studies, 15(1), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.7146/bjbs.v15i1.152531
Section
General Articles

References

Abers, R. N. (UnB) and Oliveira, M. S. de (2015) ‘Nomeações políticas no Ministério do Meio Ambiente (2003-2013): Interconexões entre ONGs, partidos e governos’, Opiniao Publica, 21(2), pp. 336–364. doi: 10.1590/1807-01912015212336.

Abranches, S. H. H. (1988) ‘Presidencialismo de Coalizão: o Dilema Institucional Brasileiro’, DADOS-REVISTA DE CIENCIAS SOCIAIS, 31(1).

Albrecht, N. F. M. de M. (2023) ‘Bureaucrats, interest groups and policymaking: a comprehensive overview from the turn of the century’, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-02044-8.

Anestaki, A. et al. (2019) ‘Race and Gender Representation in Presidential Appointments, SES, and GS Levels, During Clinton, Bush, and Obama Administrations’, Administration and Society, 51(2), pp. 197–228. doi: 10.1177/0095399716655376.

Belançon, M. C. (2018) ‘A Participação de feministas na burocracia estatal: dinâmicas e efeitos’, Revista Eletrônica de Ciência Política, 9(1). doi: 10.5380/recp.v9i1.56129.

Borges, A. and Coêlho, D. B. (2015) ‘O Preenchimento de Cargos da Burocracia Pública Federal no Presidencialismo de Coalizão Brasileiro: Análise Comparada de Dois Ministérios - Ciência e Tecnologia e Integração Nacional’, in Lopez, F. G. (ed.) Cargos de confiança no presidencialismo de coalizão brasileiro. Brasília: IPEA.

Cavalcante, P. and Carvalho, P. (2017) ‘The professionalization of brazilian federal bureaucracy (1995-2014): Advances and dilemmas’, Revista de Administração Pública - RAP, 51(1). doi: 10.1590/0034-7612144002.

Cavalcanti, P. and Palotti, P. (2017) ‘Profissionalização da burocracia federal brasileira (1995-2014): avanços e dilemas’, Revista de Administração Pública - RAP, 51(1), pp. 1–26.

D’Araújo, M. C. S. (2014) ‘Elites burocráticas, dirigentes públicos e política no Poder Executivo’, in D’Araújo, M. C. S. (ed.) Redemocratização e mudança social no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: FGV, pp. 205–229.

D’Araújo, M. C. S. and Petek, J. (2018) ‘Recrutamento e perfil dos dirigentes públicos brasileiros nas áreas econômicas e sociais entre 1995 e 2012’, Revista de Administração Pública, 52(5), pp. 840–862. doi: 10.1590/0034-761220170111.

Kennedy, A. R., Bishu, S. G. and Heckler, N. (2020) ‘Feminism, Masculinity, and Active Representation: A Gender Analysis of Representative Bureaucracy’, Administration and Society, 52(7), pp. 1101–1130. doi: 10.1177/0095399719888470.

Lameirão, C. and D’Araújo, M. C. S. (2011) ‘Dirigentes Públicos de Alto Escalão no Governo Lula’, in Cardoso Júnior, J. C. (ed.) Burocracia e Ocupação no Setor Público. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA.

Lopes, A. V. and Vieira, D. M. (2020) ‘Nomeaçãoes para Cargos Comissionados e Gruos de Interesse: Usos, Motivações e Desafios Retratados em Pesquisas Recentes’, Revista Eletrônica de Administração - REAd, 26(2), pp. 439–462.

Lopez, F. G. and Silva, T. M. da (2019) ‘Party filiation and appointment for positions in the Brazilian federal bureaucracy (1999-2018)’, Revista de Administracao Publica, 53(4), pp. 711–731. doi: 10.1590/0034-761220180387x.

Lopez, F. and Silva, T. M. da (2020) O Carrossel Burocrático nos Cargos de Confiança: análise de sobrevivência dos cargos de direção e assessoramento superior do Executivo federal brasileiro (1999-2017), Texto para discussão / Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada.- Brasília : Rio de Janeiro : Ipea. doi: 10.38116/td2597.

Perlin, G., Santos, M. L. and Guimarães, A. R. (2019) Presidencialismo de Coalizão em Movimento, Edições Câmara. Brasília: Edições Câmara.

Pitkin, H. F. (1967) The Concept of Representation. University of California Press.

Praça, S. and Lopez, F. (2018) ‘Political Appointments, Political Parties, and Bureaucracy’, in Routledge Handbook of Brazilian Politics. doi: 10.4324/9781315543871-21.

Stock, J. H. and Watson, M. (2020) Introduction to Econometrics. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Ventura, O. (2018) ‘A distribuição de capitais entre a mão esquerda e a mão direita da burocracia brasileira’, Revista de Sociologia e Política, 26(67), pp. 107–128.