Abstract
Helge Kragh leverer en skarp videnskabshistorisk og filosofisk analyse af multivers-hypotesen. Artiklen diskuterer inflationsteori, antropiske argumenter og spørgsmålet om empirisk testbarhed. Kan en teori, der postulerer kausalt utilgængelige universer, overhovedet kaldes naturvidenskab? Kragh placerer diskussionen i en bredere tradition for grænsetilfælde mellem fysik og metafysik. For den teoretisk orienterede fysiker er dette en væsentlig refleksion over metodologi og demarkationskriterier.
References
[1] B. Carr, ed. (2007), Universe or Multiverse? Cambridge.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107050990
[2] B. Carr & G. Ellis (2008), Universe or multiverse? Astronomy & Geophysics bind 49, 2.29-2.37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4004.2008.49229.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4004.2008.49229.x
[3] G. Ellis, U. Kirchner & W. Stoeger (2004), Multiverses and physical cosmology, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society bind 347, nr. 3, s. 921-936. [4] M. Rees (2003), Our Cosmic Habitat, London.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07261.x
[5] L. Susskind (2006), The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design, New York.
[6] M. Tegmark (2003), Parallel universes, Scientific American, maj 2003 (arxiv:astro-ph/0302131).
[7] A. Vilenkin (2006), Many Worlds in One, New York.
[8] A. Barrau (2007), Physics in the multiverse, Cern Courier, 20. november 2007 (http://cerncourier.com/cws/article/cern/31860).
Counting from volume 37 (2026 -), articles published are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC 4.0.
Articles in volume 1-36 (1990 - 2025) are not licensed under Creative Commons. In these volumes, all rights are reserved to the authors of the articles respectively.
