Improving Peer Feedback on Arguments

Authors

  • Mads Goddiksen

Keywords:

peer feedback, arguments, chemical, assignment

Abstract

Peer feedback can increase learning for both the person receiving feedback and, especially, the person providing (Nicol et al., 2013). Providing feedback on results of higher level cognition including evaluations and creative processes is what participants often find most challenging (UNSW, 2018). Clear and concrete guidelines should therefore be provided, if the peer feedback session is to be successful (Winstone and Carless, 2019, Ch 8).
The aim of this study was therefore to test an intervention – in the form of guidelines - designed to improve the learning outcome of peer feedback sessions where participants had to provide feedback on complex arguments.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-28

How to Cite

Goddiksen, M. (2023). Improving Peer Feedback on Arguments. Improving University Science Teaching and Learning, 17(1). Retrieved from https://tidsskrift.dk/IUSTL/article/view/136654

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 1 (2022): Improving University Science Teaching and Learning - Pedagogical Projects 2022

Section

Volume 17 - 2022

License

Counting from volume 19 (2023), articles published in IUSTL are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. The editorial board may accept other Creative Commons licenses for individual articles, if required by authors.

Articles in volume 1-18 are not licensed under Creative Commons. In these volumes, all rights are reserved to the authors. This implies that readers can download, read, and link to the articles, but they cannot republish the articles. Authors can upload their articles in an institutional repository as a part of a green open access policy.