Beyond borders: A qualitative study on the use of forensic medical evaluations in securing humanitarian parole and Title 42 exemptions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/torture.v36i1.158375Keywords:
forensic medical evaluations, humanitarian parole, Title 42, asylum, immigrationAbstract
Introduction: Forensic Medical Evaluations (FMEs), which provide objective documentation of physical and psychological consequences of past abuse, can be pivotal in immigration proceedings, offering critical evidence of persecution endured by asylum seekers, which may corroborate their claims. Yet their applicability in humanitarian parole and Title 42 exemption cases remains underexplored. Aim: To characterise the role of Istanbul Protocol–informed FMEs in support of humanitarian parole and Title 42 exemption requests in the United States, and to describe associated clinical, psychosocial, and procedural features. Methods: This qualitative study examined 21 cross-border FMEs and medical vulnerability letters submitted from 2021 to 2024 by an academic medical centre-based asylum clinic in Baltimore, Maryland, in support of applications for humanitarian parole or Title 42 exemption. Results: Remote evaluations were utilised in 85.7% of cases. The largest demographic seeking protection (42.9%) was women from Honduras, Mexico, and Guatemala residing in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico, at the U.S.-Mexico border. Our analysis revealed a significant prevalence of a history of physical or sexual assault spanning from the country of origin to transit. Threats of death or harm, robbery, and racial discrimination were also noted across various stages of the migration journey. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was the most common psychiatric diagnosis at 88.9%, followed by major depressive disorder (MDD) and generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) at 66.7% and 22.2%, respectively. Many cases (63.6%) cited inadequate mental health services in their country of origin or transit, with 57.1% of these also highlighting the unavailability of necessary medical treatment. A diverse array of medical reasons for humanitarian protection was identified, including developmental, cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, infectious, and psychiatric diseases. All cases with known outcomes received humanitarian protection. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate proof of concept for the utility of remote medico-legal evaluations for cases seeking humanitarian parole into the U.S. in addition to providing a window into the diversity of such claims.
References
American Immigration Council. (2025). The “Migrant Protection Protocols”: An explanation of the Remain in Mexico program. Washington, DC. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). APA. https://doi. org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 Amnesty International. (2018). Overlooked, under-protected: Mexico’s deadly refoulement of Central Americans seeking asylum. Amnesty International. Andisha, P., & Lueger-Schuster, B. (2024). Afghan refugee populations’ mental health: Exploring pre-migration environmental differences and post-migration stressors. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 29(3), 247–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/1 5325024.2023.2262929 Atkinson, H. G., Wyka, K., Hampton, K., Seno, C. L., Yim, E. T., Ottenheimer, D., & Arastu, N. S. (2021). Impact of forensic medical evaluations on immigration relief grant rates and correlates of outcomes in the United States. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 84, 102272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jflm.2021.102272 Atrooz, F., Chen, T. A., Biekman, B., Alrousan, G., Bick, J., & Salim, S. (2022). Displacement and isolation: Insights from a mental stress survey of Syrian refugees in Houston, Texas, USA. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5), 2547. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052547 Bayne, M., Sokoloff, L., Rinehart, R., Epie, A., Hirt, L., & Katz, C. (2019). Assessing the efficacy and experience of in-person versus telephonic psychiatric evaluations for asylum seekers in the U.S. Psychiatry Research, 282, 112612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. psychres.2019.112612 Beckett, A. G., Viaud, L., Heisler, M., & Mukherjee, J. (2022). Misusing public health as a pretext to end asylum—Title 42. New England Journal of Medicine, 386, e41. https://doi. org/10.1056/NEJMp2200274 Carlsson, J., & Sonne, C. (2018). Mental health, pre-migratory trauma and post-migratory stressors among adult refugees. In Mental health of refugee and conflict-affected populations: Theory, research and clinical practice (pp. 15–35). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97046-2_2 Cuneo, C. N., Huselton, K. E., Praschan, N. C., Saadi, A., & Gartland, M. G. (2021). What counts as ‘safe?’: Exposure to trauma and violence among asylum seekers from the Northern Triangle. Health Affairs, 40(7), 1135–1144. https://doi. org/10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00082 Cuneo, C.N., & Janeway, H. (2020). From Icebox to Tinderbox - A View from the Southern Border. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(13), e81. https://doi.org/10.1056/ NEJMp2009985 seekers. Psychiatry Research, 291, 113256. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113256 Hanna, K., Dasani, D., Saad, S., Dasani, M., Wagner, K., & Balkoski, V. (2021). Characteristics of asylum seekers in collaborative assessment program. Psychiatric Quarterly, 92, 1231–1240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-021-09897-9 DeFries, T., Emery, E., Cuneo, C.N., Mei, E., Folsom, E., Mishori, R., McKenzie, K., 2025. Development of a virtual asylum medicine curriculum: applying a medical education model to a global health priority. BMJ Glob Health, 10(2), e016646. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016646 Diamante, R. (2024). Humanitarian parole emerges as major sticking point in border talks. Spectrum News. https://spectrumlocalnews.com/tx/south-texas-el-paso/ news/2024/01/25/humanitarian-parole-senate-bordernegotiations Durgun, K., Ha, E., Kirilichin, N., & Blanchard, J. (2023). Why emergency physicians should advocate for suspension of Title 42 restrictions on asylum for U.S. immigrants. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 24(2), 149–151. https://doi.org/10.5811/ westjem.2022.11.59464 Emery, E. H., Maju, M., Coursey, K., Brandt, C., Ko, J. S., Hampton, K., & Richards, A. (2022). Trauma exposures, resilience factors, and mental health outcomes in persons granted asylum in the U.S. for claims related to domestic violence and persecution by organized gangs. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 24(4), 918–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-021-01324-2 Fabi, R., Rivas, S. D., & Griffin, M. (2022). Not in our name: The disingenuous use of “public health” as justification for Title 42 expulsions in the era of the Migrant Protection Protocols. American Journal of Public Health, 112(8), 1115–1119. https:// doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306887 Franceschetti, L., Magli, F., Merelli, V. G., Muccino, E. A., Gentilomo, A., Agazzi, F., Gibelli, D. M., Gambarana, M., De Angelis, D., Kustermann, A., & Cattaneo, C. (2019). The effect of the medico-legal evaluation on asylum seekers in the Metropolitan City of Milan, Italy: A pilot study. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 133(3), 669–675. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00414-018-1867-8 Gallagher, A., Steiner, G., Michel, M., Gonzales, C. N., MendezContreras, S., Lu, A., Armendariz, M., DeFries, T., Barakat, S., & Kivlahan, C. (2022). Asylum seeker trauma in a studentrun clinic: Reducing barriers to forensic medical evaluations. Torture Journal, 32(3), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.7146/torture. v32i3.130227 Goodkind, J., Ferrera, J., Lardier, D., Hess, J. M., & Greene, R. N. (2021). A mixed method study of the effects of post-migration economic stressors on the mental health of recently resettled refugees. Society and Mental Health, 11(3), 217–235. https:// doi.org/10.1177/2156869320973446 Gostin, L. O., & Friedman, E. A. (2023). Title 42 exclusions of asylum seekers—a misuse of public health powers. JAMA Health Forum, 4(3), e230078. https://doi.org/10.1001/ jamahealthforum.2023.0078 Green, A. S., Ruchman, S. G., Katz, C. L., & Singer, E. K. (2020). Piloting forensic tele-mental health evaluations of asylum Hill, C. E., Knox, S., Thompson, B. J., Williams, E. N., Hess, S. A., & Ladany, N. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: An update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.196 Jordan, M. (2024). Judge upholds Biden program giving some immigrants short-term legal status. The New York Times. Lagunes-Cordoba, E., Davalos, A., Fresan-Orellana, A., Jarrett, M., Gonzalez-Olvera, J., Thornicroft, G., & Henderson, C. (2021). Mental health service users’ perceptions of stigma, from the general population and from mental health professionals in Mexico: A qualitative study. Community Mental Health Journal, 57, 985–993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-020-00706-4 Lasowski, P., Moscicki, O., Liu, C. Z., Katzenstein, C., Singer, E. K., & Baranowski, K. A. (2023). Persecution and migration experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/ questioning, and other sexual and gender minority asylum seekers. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 36, 605–616. https://doi. org/10.1002/jts.22932 Long, C., Salomon, G., & Groves, S. (2024). A last sticking point in border security negotiations is humanitarian parole. Here’s what that means. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/immigrationhumanitarian-parole-biden-mexico-border-republicans-e6bdd78 abac8892cefd117556d6aa5f5 Lozano, J. (2024). Program that allows 30,000 migrants from 4 countries into the U.S. each month upheld by judge. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/immigration-biden-haiti-cubanicaragua-venezuela-trial-fac9dc853231ba04ff0ea4e7442057ef Lustig, S. L., Kureshi, S., Delucchi, K. L., Iacopino, V., & Morse, S. C. (2008). Asylum grant rates following medical evaluations of maltreatment among political asylum applicants in the United States. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 10, 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-007-9056-8 Médecins Sans Frontières. (2017). Forced to flee Central America’s Northern Triangle: A neglected humanitarian crisis. Médecins Sans Frontières. Mishori, R., Hampton, K., Habbach, H., Raker, E., Niyogi, A., & Murphey, D. (2021). “Better than having no evaluation done”: A pilot project to conduct remote asylum evaluations for clients in a migrant encampment in Mexico. BMC Health Services Research, 21, 508. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-02106539-5 Montoya-Gálvez, C. (2025). Trump administration accidentally tells Ukrainian refugees they must leave the U.S. immediately, citing an “error.” CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trumpadministration-accidentally-tells-ukrainian-refugees-they-mustleave-u-s-immediately-citing-an-error/ Office of the Under Secretary for Management. (2024). Parole requests fiscal year 2023, fourth quarter. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Peart, J. M., Tracey, E. H., & Lipoff, J. B. (2016). The role of physicians in asylum evaluation: Documenting torture and trauma. JAMA Internal Medicine, 176(3), 417. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0053 Physicians for Human Rights, Asylum Medicine Training Initiative, & Society of Asylum Medicine. (2025). A clinician’s role in forensic medical and mental health evaluations. Physicians for Human Rights; Asylum Medicine Training Initiative; Society of Asylum Medicine. https://phr.org/wp-content/ uploads/2025/02/PHR-AMTI-SAM-Memo-Feb-2025.pdf Pogue, M., Raker, E., Hampton, K., Saint Laurent, M.-L., & Mishori, R. (2021). Conducting remote medical asylum evaluations in the United States during COVID-19: Clinicians’ perspectives on acceptability, challenges and opportunities. injunction. https://www.uscis.gov/newsroom/alerts/litigationrelated-update-supreme-court-stay-of-chnv-preliminaryinjunction U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (2025b). Update on Form I-134A. https://www.uscis.gov/newsroom/alerts/updateon-form-i-134a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (2023). Humanitarian or significant public benefit parole for individuals outside the United States. https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/humanitarian_ parole Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 84, 102255. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jflm.2021.102255 Rosenberg, M., Cooke, K., & Trotta, D. (2022). The border’s toll: Migrants increasingly die crossing into U.S. Reuters. Santana, R. (2022). What’s the potential impact of the Supreme Court’s Title 42 ruling? PBS NewsHour. https://www.pbs.org/ newshour/politics/whats-the-potential-impact-of-the-supremecourts-title-42-ruling The White House. (2025). Securing our borders. https://www. whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/securing-ourborders/ Simeon, O. F., & Cuneo, C. N. (2023). Remote evaluations for humanitarian parole of asylum seekers to the United States— The case of MA: English. Torture Journal, 33(1), 119–122. https://doi.org/10.7146/torture.v33i1.134905 Federal Register. (2025). Termination of parole processes for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans. https://www. federalregister.gov/documents/2025/03/25/2025-05128/ termination-of-parole-processes-for-cubans-haitiansnicaraguans-and-venezuelans Trautmann, S., Rehm, J., & Wittchen, H. (2016). The economic costs of mental disorders. EMBO Reports, 17(9), 1245–1249. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201642951 Ulrich, M. R., & Crosby, S. S. (2022). Title 42, asylum, and politicising public health. Lancet Regional Health – Americas, 7, 100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2021.100124 UNHCR. (2025). Global trends report. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. https://www.unhcr.org/refugeestatistics/ United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2022). Istanbul Protocol: Manual on the effective investigation and documentation of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (Rev. 2). United Nations. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (2025a). Litigationrelated update: Supreme Court stay of CHNV preliminary U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (2022). Guidance on evidence for certain types of humanitarian or significant public benefit parole requests. https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/ humanitarian-or-significant-public-benefit-parole-fornoncitizens-outside-the-united-states/guidance-on-evidencefor-certain-types-of-humanitarian-or-significant-public-benefitparole-requests U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2025). DHS releases statement on major Supreme Court victory for Trump Administration and the American people on ending the CHNV parole program. https://www.dhs.gov/news/2025/05/30/dhsreleases-statement-major-scotus-victory-trump-administrationand-american U.S. House of Representatives. (1952). 8 USC §1158. Asylum. Office of the Law Revision Counsel. https://uscode.house. gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid%3AUSC-prelim-title8section1158&num=0&edition=prelim Wikholm, K., Mishori, R., Ottenheimer, D., Korostyshevskiy, V., Reingold, R., Wikholm, C., & Hampton, K. (2020). Female genital mutilation/cutting as grounds for asylum requests in the U.S.: An analysis of more than 100 cases. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 22(4), 675–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10903-020-00994-8 Zard, M., McCann, K., Heisler, M., Spiegel, P. B., & Waldman, R. (2022). Public health law must never again be misused to expel asylum seekers: Title 42. Nature Medicine, 28, 1333–1334. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01814-2 Zero, O., Kempner, M., Hsu, S., Haleem, H., Tobin-Tyler, E., & Toll, E. (2019). Addressing global human rights violations in Rhode Island: The Brown Human Rights Asylum Clinic. Rhode Island Medical Journal, 102(4), 17–20.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Torture Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
We accept that some authors (e.g. government employees in some countries) are unable to transfer copyright. The Creative Commons Licence Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) covers both the Torture Journal and the IRCT web site. The publisher will not put any limitation on the personal freedom of the author to use material contained in the paper in other works which may be published, provided that acknowledgement is made to the original place of publication.
