The future is here: Mind control and torture in the digital era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/torture.v32i1-2.132846Keywords:
torture, non-lethal weapons, neuro-warfare, nanotechnologies, mind control, surveillance methods, neuro-ethics, cognitive libertyAbstract
Torture, understood as a relationship of domination in which one person breaks the will and impedes the self-determination of another human being, taking control of all aspects of the victims’ life and trying to change the core elements of their identity to the perpetrator’s interests (Pérez-Sales, 2017), will increasingly come to be linked to new technologies, artificial intelligence, the use of media and internet, and to new forms of lethal and non-lethal
weapons. The author reviews the implications of modern technology for the contemporary fight against torture and some of the emerging civil society initiatives that aim to face them.
References
Altmann, J. (2004). Military uses of
nanotechnology: Perspectives and concerns.
Security Dialogue, 35(1), 61–79. https://doi.
org/10.1177/0967010604042536
Balmer, A. (2018). Lie Detection and the Law.
In Lie Detection and the Law. https://doi.
org/10.4324/9781315720258
Bates, M. (2021). A Step Closer to Mind Control for
Everyday Life. IEEE Pulse, 12(1), 16–18. https://
doi.org/10.1109/MPULS.2021.3052589
Benedikter, R., Siepmann, K., & Barbara, S. (2016).
“Head-transplanting” and “mind-uploading”.
Philosophical implictions of potential social
consequences of two medico-scientific utopias.
Rview of Contemporary Philosophy, 16, 38–82.
Boire, R. (2000). On Cognitive Liberty. Journal of
Cognitive Liberties, 1(1), 1–26.
Carle, S. D. (2021). The insights, uses, and ethics of
social neuroscience in anti-discrimination law.
In Regulating Neuroscience: Translational Legal
Challenges (1st ed., Vol. 4). Elsevier Inc. https://
doi.org/10.1016/bs.dnb.2021.02.001
Costa e Silva, J. A., & Steffen, R. E. (2017). The
future of psychiatry: brain devices. Metabolism:
Clinical and Experimental, 69, S8–S12. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.metabol.2017.01.010
Crowley, M. (2016). Chemical Control. Regulation
of incapacitating chemical agent weapons, riot
control agents and their means of delivery. Palgrave
McMill.
Dabbour, A. H., Tan, S., Kim, S. H., Guild, S.
J., Heppner, P., McCormick, D., Wright, B.
E., Leung, D., Gallichan, R., Budgett, D., &
Malpas, S. C. (2021). The Safety of Micro-
Implants for the Brain. Frontiers in Neuroscience,
(December), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/
fnins.2021.796203
Dando, M. (2015). Neuroscience and the Future of
Chemical-Biological Weapons. Palgrave Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137381828
Davis, K., & Patterson, D. (2012). Ethics of big data.
Balancing risk and innovation. O’Reilly.
Davison, N. (2009a). Accoustic weapons. In Non_
lethal weapons. Palgrave McMillan.
Davison, N. (2009b). Directed Energy Weapons. In
Non-lethal weapons. Palgrave McMillan.
Dermengiu, D., Hostiuc, S., & Curcǎ, G. C.
(2008). Electroshock weapons: Physiologic and
pathologic effects - Literature review. Romanian
Journal of Legal Medicine, 16(3), 187–193. https://
doi.org/10.4323/rjlm.2008.187
Goering, S., Klein, E., Specker Sullivan, L., Wexler,
A., Agüera y Arcas, B., Bi, G., Carmena,
J. M., Fins, J. J., Friesen, P., Gallant, J.,
Huggins, J. E., Kellmeyer, P., Marblestone, A.,
Mitchell, C., Parens, E., Pham, M., Rubel, A.,
Sadato, N., Teicher, M., … Yuste, R. (2021).
Recommendations for Responsible Development
and Application of Neurotechnologies.
Neuroethics, 14(3), 365–386. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s12152-021-09468-6
Guthrie, A. (2017). The rise of big data policing.
Surveillance, race and the future of law enforcement.
New York University Press.
Herrera-Ferrá, K. (2021). Bioculture and the global
regulatory gap in neuroscience, neurotechnology,
and neuroethics. In Regulating Neuroscience:
Translational Legal Challenges (1st ed., Vol.
. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/
bs.dnb.2021.08.001
Hofkirchner, W., & Kreowski, H.-J. (2021).
Transhumanism : the proper guide to a posthuman
condition or a dangerous idea? Springer.
Hsu, N. S., Fang, H. Y., David, K. K., Gnadt, J. W.,
Peng, G. C., Talley, E. M., Ward, J. M., Ngai,
J., & Koroshetz, W. J. (2020). The promise
of the BRAIN initiative: NIH strategies for understanding neural circuit function. Current
Opinion in Neurobiology, 65, 162–166. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.conb.2020.10.008
Ienca, M. (2021). On Neurorights. Frontiers in
Human Neuroscience, 15(September). https://doi.
org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.701258
Illes, J., & Hevia, M. (2021). Neuroscience, Ethics, and
Law: The Past Foretells the Present. Academic Press.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s2589-2959(21)00016-3
Illes, Judy, & Hossain, S. (2017). Neuroethics:
Anticipating the future. Neuroethics: Anticipating
the Future, 1–654. https://doi.org/10.1093/
oso/9780198786832.001.0001
Institute for Security Studies. (2016). Compliance
through pain. Electric shock equipment in South
African prisons. (Issue June).
Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate. (2011). Non-
Lethal weapons (NLW) Reference Book. In
Freedom of Information act - Accepted for Disclosure
(Vol. 552, Issue June).
Jorgenson, L. A., Newsome, W., Anderson, D. J.,
Bargmann, C. I., Brown, E. N., Deisseroth,
K., Donoghue, J. P., Hudson, K. L., Ling, G.
S. F., Macleish, P. R., Marder, E., Normann,
R. A., Sanes, J. R., Schnitzer, M. J., Sejnowski,
T. J., Tank, D. W., Tsien, R. Y., Ugurbil, K., &
Wingfield, J. C. (2015). The BRAIN initiative:
Developing technology to catalyse neuroscience
discovery. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1668). https://
doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0164
Koroshetz, W., Gordon, J., Adams, A., Beckel-
Mitchener, A., Churchill, J., Farber, G., Freund,
M., Gnadt, J., Hsu, N. S., Langhals, N., Lisanby,
S., Liu, G., Peng, G. C. Y., Ramos, K., Steinmetz,
M., Talley, E., & White, S. (2018). The state of
the NIH brain initiative. Journal of Neuroscience,
(29), 6427–6438. https://doi.org/10.1523/
JNEUROSCI.3174-17.2018
Krishnan, A. (2016). Military neuroscience and
the coming age of neurowarfare. In Military
Neuroscience and the Coming Age of Neurowarfare.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315595429
Labbe, P. (2019). Cognitive Networks and
Systems to Improve Coalition Operations
Effectiveness. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE
th Asian Conference on Defence Technology,
ACDT 2019, 182–187. https://doi.org/10.1109/
ACDT47198.2019.9072792
Lane, A., Luminet, O., Rimé, B., Gross, J. J., de
Timary, P., & Mikolajczak, M. (2013). Oxytocin
increases willingness to socially share one’s
emotions. International Journal of Psychology :
Journal International de Psychologie, 48(4),
–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.201
677540
Leppanen, J., Ng, K. W., Kim, Y. R., Tchanturia, K.,
& Treasure, J. (2018). Meta-analytic review of the
effects of a single dose of intranasal oxytocin on
threat processing in humans. Journal of Affective
Disorders, 225, 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jad.2017.08.041
Lushetich, N. (2021). Big data - a new medium?
Routledge.
Lyon, D., & Murakami, D. (2021). Big Data
surveillance and security intelligence. The Canadian
case. UBC Press. Vancouver. Toronto.
McGee, E. M., & Maguire, G. Q. (2007). Becoming
borg to become immortal: Regulating brain
implant technologies. Cambridge Quarterly of
Healthcare Ethics, 16(3), 291–302. https://doi.
org/10.1017/S0963180107070326
National Research Council. (2003). An Assessment of
Non-Lethal weapons. Science and Technology. In
An Assessment of Non-Lethal Weapons. Science and
Technology. National Academies Press. https://doi.
org/10.17226/9820
Nixdorff, K., Borisova, T., Komisarenko, S.,
& Dando, M. (2018). Dual-use nanoneurotechnology:
An assessment of the
implications of trends in science and technology.
Politics and the Life Sciences, 37(2), 180–202.
https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2018.15
Pérez-Sales, P. (2017). Psychological Torture:
Definition, evaluation and measurement. In
Psychological Torture: Definition, Evaluation and
Measurement. Routledge Books. https://doi.
org/10.4324/9781315616940
Pérez-Sales, P. (2020). The 6/24 rule: A review and
proposal for an international standard of a
minimum of six hours of continuous sleep in
detention settings. Torture Journal, 29(2), 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.7146/torture.v29i3.118024
Pérez-Sales, P. (2021). Defining and documenting
threats in the context of ill-treatment and
torture. Torture Journal, 31(1), 3–18. https://doi.
org/10.7146/torture.v31i1.125777
Pérez-Sales, P., & Serra, L. (2020). Internet and
communications as elements for CIDT and
Torture. Initial reflections in an unexplored
field. Torture Journal, 30(1), 5–22. https://doi.
org/10.7146/torture.v30i1.120593
Poldrack, R. A. (2008). The role of fMRI in cognitive
neuroscience: where do we stand? Current
Opinion in Neurobiology, 18(2), 223–227. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2008.07.006
Risling, M. (2006). Detailed Examples of NLT : Radio
Frequency Energy , Kinetic Energy and Electro-
Muscular Devices (RTO-EN-HFM-145).
Salari, V., Rodrigues, S., Saglamyurek, E., Simon, C.,
& Oblak, D. (2022). Are Brain–Computer
Interfaces Feasible With Integrated Photonic
Chips? Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15(January),
–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.780344
Salles, A. (2021). Humanness: Some neuroethical
reflections. In Regulating Neuroscience:
Translational Legal Challenges (1st ed., Vol.
. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/
bs.dnb.2021.03.002
Schep, L. J., Slaughter, R. J., & McBride, D. I.
(2015). Riot control agents: The tear gases CN,
CS and OC-a medical review. Journal of the Royal
Army Medical Corps, 161(2), 94–99. https://doi.
org/10.1136/jramc-2013-000165
Stroud, N. J., & McGregor, S. C. (2019). Digital
discussions: how big data informs political
communication. Routledge.
United States Air Force Research Laboratory. (2002).
Biological effects of directed energy. AFRL-HEBR-
TR-2002-0226, 8(6), 41‐49.
Verwey, W. D. (1977). Riot Control Agents and
Herbicides in War: Their Humanitarian, Toxicological,
Ecological, Military, Polemological, and Legal
Aspects. Sithjoff International Publishing.
Volcler, J. (2013). Extremely Loud. Sound as weapon.
The New Press.
Wan, J., Zhou, S., Mea, H. J., Guo, Y., Ku, H.,
& Urbina, B. M. (2021). Emerging Roles of
Microfluidics in Brain Research: From Cerebral
Fluids Manipulation to Brain-on-a-Chip
and Neuroelectronic Devices Engineering.
Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.
chemrev.1c00480
Willett, F. R., Avansino, D. T., Hochberg, L. R.,
Henderson, J. M., & Shenoy, K. V. (2021).
High-performance brain-to-text communication
via handwriting. Nature, 593(7858), 249–254.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03506-2
Wright, S. (2002). Future sub-lethal, incapacitating &
paralysing technologies: Their coming role in the
mass production of torture, cruel and degrading
treatment. Raft Paper Presented To The Expert
Seminar On Security Equipment & The Prevention
Of Torture, October, 1–26.
Yuste, R., Genser, J., & Herrmann, S. (2021). It’s
Time for Neuro-Rights. Horizons, 18, 154–164.
Zúñiga-Fajuri, A., Miranda, L. V., Miralles, D.
Z., & Venegas, R. S. (2021). Neurorights in
Chile: Between neuroscience and legal science.
In Regulating Neuroscience: Translational Legal
Challenges (1st ed., Vol. 4). Elsevier Inc. https://
doi.org/10.1016/bs.dnb.2021.06.001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Torture Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
We accept that some authors (e.g. government employees in some countries) are unable to transfer copyright. The Creative Commons Licence Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) covers both the Torture Journal and the IRCT web site. The publisher will not put any limitation on the personal freedom of the author to use material contained in the paper in other works which may be published, provided that acknowledgement is made to the original place of publication.
