Virksomheders administrative byrder i offentlige udbud
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v56i4.151664Nøgleord:
administrative byrder, offentlige udbud, virksomheder, kontrakter, administrative ressourcerResumé
Forvaltningsforskningen har i de senere år sat stor fokus på administrative byrder i mødet mellem borgere og staten. Denne artikel bidrager til litteraturen om administrative byrder ved at sætte fokus på virksomheders omkostninger i offentlige udbud. Artiklen præsenterer en konceptuel ramme til at analysere virksomheders lærings- og efterlevelsesomkostninger i offentlige udbudsprocesser. Rammens anvendelighed illustreres gennem to empiriske studier af danske virksomheders omkostninger ved at deltage i offentlige udbud. Analyserne viser, at virksomhedernes omkostninger til at forberede og afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud udgør en betydelig del af kontrakternes værdi. Analyserne indikerer desuden, at byrderne især varierer betydeligt med offentlige ordregiveres design af udbudsprocesserne og i mindre grad med virksomhedernes administrative ressourcer. Jeg diskuterer afslutningsvis, hvordan offentlige ordregivere kan bruge indsigterne til at reducere virksomhedernes administrative byrder i udbud.
Referencer
Barnes, Carolyn Y. (2021). “It takes a while to get used to”: The costs of redeeming public benefits. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 31 (2): 295-310.
Bel, Germá, Xavier Fageda og Mildred E. Warner (2010). Is private production of public services cheaper than public production? A meta‐regression analysis of solid waste and water services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 29 (3): 553-577.
Blom-Hansen, Jens (2003). Is private delivery of public services really cheaper? Evidence from public road maintenance in Denmark. Public Choice 115 (3): 419-438.
Brogaard, Lena (2019). Business value in public-private partnerships: The positive impact of trust and task-relevant competencies on business outcomes in PPPs. International Public Management Journal 22 (4): 617-642.
Brown, Trevor L. og Matthew Potoski (2003). Transaction costs and institutional explanations for government service production decisions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13 (4): 441–468.
Burden, Barry C., David T. Canon, Kenneth R. Mayer og Donald P. Moynihan (2012). The effect of administrative burden on bureaucratic perception of policies: Evidence from election administration. Public Administration Review 72(5): 741–51.
Bækgaard, Martin, Matthias Döring og Mette K. Thomsen (2023). It’s not merely about the content: How rules are communicated matters to administrative burden. Public Administration Review. Early view https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13751.
Bækgaard, Martin, Kim S. Mikkelsen, Jonas K. Madsen and Julian Christensen (2021). Reducing compliance demands in government benefit programs improves the psychological well-being of target group members. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 31 (4): 806-821.
Carter, David P., Tyler A. Scott og Nadia Mahallati (2018). Balancing barriers to entry and administrative burden in voluntary regulation. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 1 (3): 207-221.
Christensen, Julian, Lene Aarøe, Martin Bækgaard, Pamela Herd og Donald P. Moynihan (2020). Human capital and administrative burden: The role of cognitive resources in citizen–state interactions. Public Administration Review 80 (1): 127-136.
Coase, Ronald (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica 4 (16): 386-405.
Cullen, Alicia M. (2012). The small business set-aside program: Where achievement means consistently failing to meet small business contracting goals. Public Contract Law Journal 41 (3): 703-720.
Dyer, Jeffrey H. og Wujin Chu (2003). The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: Empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organization Science 14 (1): 57-68.
Döring, Matthias (2021). How-to bureaucracy: A concept of citizens’ administrative literacy. Administration & Society 53 (8): 1155-1177.
Döring, Matthias og Jonas K. Madsen (2022). Mitigating psychological costs—The role of citizens’ administrative literacy and social capital. Public Administration Review 82 (4): 671-681.
Fernandez, Sergio, Deanna Malatesta og Craig R. Smith (2013). Race, gender, and government contracting: Different explanations or new prospects for theory? Public Administration Review 73 (1): 109-120.
Halling, Aske og Martin Bækgaard (2023). Administrative burden in citizen-state interactions: a systematic literature review. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Early view. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muad023
Hansen, Jesper R., Ole H. Petersen, Anders R. Villadsen og Kurt Houlberg (2017). Private virksomheders transaktionsomkostninger ved offentlige udbud. Center for Forskning i Offentligt-Privat Samspil, Roskilde Universitet.
Heinrich, Carolyn J. (2016). The bite of administrative burden: A theoretical and empirical investigation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26 (3): 403-420.
Herd, Pamel og Donald P. Moynihan (2019). Administrative burden: policymaking by other means. New York: Russell Sage.
Herd, Pamela, Thomas DeLeire, Hope Harvey og Donald P. Moynihan (2013). Shifting administrative burden to the state: The case of medicaid take‐up. Public Administration Review 73 (s1): S69-81.
Jilke, Sebastian, Wouter Van Dooren og Sabine Rys (2018). Discrimination and administrative burden in public service markets: Does a public-private difference exist? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28 (3): 423-439.
Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen (2023). Status for offentlig konkurrence. Valby.
Levin, Jonathan og Steven Tadelis (2010). Contracting for government services: Theory and evidence from US cities. The Journal of Industrial Economics 58 (3): 507-541.
Madsen, Jonas K. og Kim S. Mikkelsen (2022). How salient administrative burden affects job seekers’ locus of control and responsibility attribution: evidence from a survey experiment. International Public Management Journal 25 (2): 241-260.
Madsen, Jonas K., Kim S. Mikkelsen og Donald P. Moynihan (2022). Burdens, sludge, ordeals, red tape, oh my!: A user’s guide to the study of frictions. Public Administration 100 (2): 375-393.
Masood, Ayesha og Muhammad A. Nisar (2021). Administrative capital and citizens’ responses to administrative burden. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 31 (1): 56-72.
Moynihan, Donald, Pamela Herd og Hope Harvey (2015). Administrative burden: Learning, psychological, and compliance costs in citizen–state interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (1): 43-69.
Petersen, Ole H., Jesper R. Hansen og Kurt Houlberg (2024). The administrative burden of doing business with the government: Learning and compliance costs in business‐government interactions. Public Administration 102 (1): 188-206.
Petersen, Ole. H., Erik Bækkeskov, Matthew Potoski og Trevor L. Brown (2019). Measuring and managing ex ante transaction costs in public sector contracting. Public Administration Review 79 (5): 641-650.
Petersen, Ole H., Ulf Hjelmar og Karsten Vrangbæk (2018). Is contracting out of public services still the great panacea? A systematic review of studies on economic and quality effects from 2000 to 2014. Social Policy & Administration 52 (1): 130-157.
Tadelis, Steven (2012). Public procurement design: Lessons from the private sector. International Journal of Industrial Organization 30 (3): 297-302.
Teodoro, Manuel P. og David Switzer (2016). Drinking from the talent pool: a resource endowment theory of human capital and agency performance. Public Administration Review 76 (4): 564-575.
Villadsen, Anders R. og Jesper N. Wulff (2021). Are you 110% sure? Modeling of fractions and proportions in strategy and management research. Strategic Organization 19 (2): 312-337.
Williamson, O. E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2024 PoliticaOphavsretten tilhører Politica. Materialet må ikke bruges eller distribueres i kommercielt øjemed.
