Smittebeskyttende adfærd under anden bølge af covid-19 pandemien i Danmark
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v54i4.134832Nøgleord:
smitteforebyggende adfærd, protection motivation theory, nationalt repræsentativt surveyResumé
Et afgørende fokus under covid-19-pandemien har været på at motivere omfattende adfærdsændringer i befolkningen. I denne artikel undersøger vi, hvilke psykologiske faktorer der var mest afgørende for danskernes adfærd under anden bølge af pandemien. Baseret på en spørgeskemaundersøgelse, der er repræsentativ for den voksne danske befolkning, viser vi, at folk, der (1) oplever coronavirusset som en personlig trussel, (2) oplever, at en ændret adfærd gør en forskel (”responseffektivitet”), (3) oplever, at en ændret adfærd ikke har høje omkostninger (”responsomkostninger”), samt (4) har høj institutionel tillid, er mere tilbøjelige til at agere i overensstemmelse med de smittebeskyttende adfærdsråd. Samtidig viser vi, at faktorerne (2)-(4) neutraliserer sammenhængen mellem trusselsfølelsen og den smittebeskyttende adfærd. Dermed anviser vi en potentiel vej til at fremme adfærdsændringer under en krise, der går udenom den frygt.
Referencer
Amidon, Timothy, Alex Nielsen, Ehren Pflugfelder, Daniel Richards og Sonia Stephens (2021). Visual risk literacy in “flatten the curve” COVID-19 visualizations. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 35 (1): 101-109.
Anderson, Roy M., Hans Heesterbeek, Don Klinkenberg og Deidre Hollingsworth (2020). How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? The Lancet 395 (10228): 931-934.
Bavel, Jay Van, Katherine Baicker, Paul Boggio, Valerio Capraro, Aleksandra Cichocka, Mina Cikara … og Robb Willer (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour 4 (5): 460-471.
Bish, Allison og Susan Michie (2010). Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: A review. British Journal of Health Psychology 15 (4): 797-824.
Bonell, Chris, Susan Michie, Stephen Reicher, Robert West, Laura Bear, Lucy Yardley, Val Curtis, Richard Amlot og James Rubin (2020). Harnessing behavioural science in public health campaigns to maintain “social distancing” in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: key principles. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 74 (8): 617-619.
Brodeur, Abel, Idaliya Grigoryeva, og Lamis Kattan (2021). Stay-at-home orders, social distancing, and trust. Journal of Population Economics 34 (4): 1321-1354.
Brouard, Sylvain, Pavlos Vasilopoulos og Michael Becher (2020). Sociodemographic and psychological correlates of compliance with the Covid-19 public health measures in France. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 53 (2): 253-258.
Brug, Johannes, Arja Aro, Anke Oenema, Onno De Zwart, Jan Hendrik Richardus og George Bishop (2004). SARS risk perception, knowledge, precautions, and information sources, the Netherlands. Emerging Infectious Diseases 10 (8): 1486.
Bøggild, Troels og Carsten Jensen (2020). Reappraisal and extensions of the rally ”round the flag effect”: Longitudinal evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis. Working Paper.
Chaiuk, Tetyana A. og Olha V. Dunaievska (2020). Fear culture in media: An examination on coronavirus discourse. Journal of History Culture and Art Research 9 (2): 184-194.
Durante, Ruben, Luigi Guiso og Giorgio Gulino (2021). Asocial capital: Civic culture and social distancing during COVID-19. Journal of Public Economics 194: 104342.
Hainmueller, Jens, Jonathan Mummolo og Yiqing Xu (2019). How much should we trust estimates from multiplicative interaction models? Simple tools to improve empirical practice. Political Analysis 27 (2): 163-192.
Hansen, Pelle G., Erik G. Larsen og Caroline D. Gundersen (2022). Reporting on one’s behavior: a survey experiment on the nonvalidity of self-reported COVID-19 hygiene-relevant routine behaviors. Behavioural Public Policy 6 (1): 34-51.
Harper, Craig, Liam Satchell, Dean Fido og Robert Latzman (2021). Functional fear predicts public health compliance in the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 19 (5): 1875-1888.
Johnson, Tim, Christopher Dawes, James Fowler og Oleg Smirnov (2020). Slowing COVID-19 transmission as a social dilemma: Lessons for government officials from interdisciplinary research on cooperation. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.31.150
Jørgensen, Frederik Juhl, Alexander Bor og Michael Bang Petersen (2021a). Compliance without fear: Individual‐level protective behaviour during the first wave of the COVID‐19 pandemic. British Journal of Health Psychology 26 (2): 679-696.
Jørgensen, Frederik Juhl, Alexander Bor og Michael Bang Petersen (2021b). How the development, features and roll-out of a SARS-COV-2 vaccine shape public acceptance: A conjoint experiment in a large representative sample of Danes. Working Paper. https://assets.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1237898/v1/b4b62971-0905-4952-9d3a-f7c103203ed7.pdf?c=1645718274
Jørgensen, Frederik Juhl, Louise Halberg Nielsen og Michael Bang Petersen (2021). Willingness to take the booster vaccine in a nationally representative sample of Danes.
Jørgensen, Frederik, Marie Lindholt, Alexander Bor og Michael Bang Petersen (2021). Does face mask use elicit risk-compensation? Quasi-experimental evidence from Denmark during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. European Journal of Public Health 31 (6): 1259-1265.
Jørgensen, Frederik, Alexander Bor, Magnus Storm Rasmussen, Marie Lindholt og Michael Bang Petersen (2022). Pandemic fatigue fueled political discontent during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, under udgivelse.
Larsen, Martin V., Jacob Nyrup og Michael Bang Petersen (2020). Do survey estimates of the public’s compliance with COVID-19 regulations suffer from social desirability bias? Journal of Behavioral Public Administration 3 (2). https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.32.164
Lewnard, Joseph A. og Nathan C. Lo (2020). Scientific and ethical basis for social-distancing interventions against COVID-19. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 20 (6): 631-633.
Lieberoth, Andreas, Shiang-Yi Lin, Sabrina Stöckli, Hyemin Han, Marta Kowal, Rebekah Gelpi ... og Dmitrii Dubrov (2021). Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic: Relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey. Royal Society Open Science 8 (2): 200589.
Lindholt, Marie, Frederik Jørgensen, Alexander Bor og Michael Bang Petersen (2021). Public acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines: cross-national evidence on levels and individual-level predictors using observational data. BMJ Open 11 (6): e048172.
Maddux, James og Ronald Rogers (1983). Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 19 (5): 469-479.
Ostrom, Elinor (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: Presidential address, American Political Science Association, 1997. American Political Science Review 92 (1): 1-22.
Pearce, Julia, Lasse Lindekilde, David Parker og Brooke Rogers (2019). Communicating with the public about Marauding terrorist firearms attacks: Results from a survey experiment on factors influencing intention to “run, hide, tell” in the United Kingdom and Denmark. Risk Analysis 39 (8): 1675-1694.
Petersen, Michael Bang, Alexander Bor, Frederik Jørgensen og Marie Lindholt (2021). Transparent communication about negative features of COVID-19 vaccines decreases acceptance but increases trust. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (29).
Rad, Roghayeh Ezati, Shokrollah Mohseni, Hesamaddin Takhti, Mehdi Hassani Azad, Nahid Shahabi, Teamur Aghamolaei og Fatemeh Norozian (2021). Application of the protection motivation theory for predicting COVID-19 preventive behaviors in Hormozgan, Iran: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 21 (1): 1-11.
Rogers, Ronald (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change1. The Journal of Psychology 91 (1): 93-114.
Ruiter, Robert, Charles Abraham og Gerjo Kok (2001). Scary warnings and rational precautions: A review of the psychology of fear appeals. Psychology and Health 16 (6): 613-630.
Sheeran, Paschal, Peter Harris og Tracy Epton (2014). Does heightening risk appraisals change people’s intentions and behavior? A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Psychological Bulletin 140 (2): 511.
Teasdale, Emma, Lucy Yardley, Wolff Schlotz og Susan Michie (2012). The importance of coping appraisal in behavioural responses to pandemic flu. British Journal of Health Psychology 17 (1): 44-59.
Tyler, Tom og Jonathan Jackson (2014). Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: Motivating compliance, cooperation, and engagement. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 20 (1): 78.
Tænketanken Europa (2022). Tidslinje over coronakrisen: Hvad skete der og hvornår? http://thinkeuropa.dk/politik/tidslinje-over-coronakrisen-hvad-skete-der-og-hvornaar
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2022 PoliticaOphavsretten tilhører Politica. Materialet må ikke bruges eller distribueres i kommercielt øjemed.
