I hvilket omfang må staten puffe os til at donere vores organer?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v50i2.131202Resumé
Organtransplantation redder liv og forøger livskvalitet. Der er imidlertid alt for få organer til rådighed. Der er for få donorer. Hvad kan vi gøre for at få flere donorer? Et nyere løsningsforslag er at nudge eller ”puffe” folk til at træffe en beslutning. En vigtig fordel ved puffepolitikker er, at den ønskede adfærdsændring frembringes uden anvendelse af tvang. Imidlertid er politikkerne ikke uproblematiske. Selvom de ikke begrænser vores valgfrihed, kan de hævdes at krænke vores selvbestemmelsesret. De rejser altså et klassisk dilemma mellem et hensyn til borgernes velfærd (i dette tilfælde folk på venteliste til en organdonation) og borgernes selvbestemmelsesret (i dette tilfælde til selv at bestemme, hvad der skal ske med deres organer efter deres død). En politik, hvor borgerne som udgangspunkt står som organdonorer, kan dog retfærdiggøres. Den vil alt andet lige fremme udbuddet af organer væsentligt, og i lyset heraf er dens delvise krænkelse af folks ret til selvbestemmelse en acceptabel omkostning.
Referencer
Abadie, Alberto og Sebastien Gay (2006). The impact of presumed consent legislation on cadaveric organ donation: a cross-country study. Journal of Health Economics 25 (4): 599–620.
Albertsen, Andreas (2018). Deemed consent: Assessing the new opt-out approach to organ procurement in Wales. Journal of Medical Ethics.
Blumenthal-Barby, J.S. (2013). Choice architecture: A mechanism for improving decisions while preserving liberty?, pp. 178-196 i Christian Coons and Michael Weber (red.), Paternalism: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Camerer, Colin et al. (2003). Regulation for conservatives: Behavioral economics and the case for “asymmetric paternalism”. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 151 (3): 1211-1254.
Csillag, Claudio (1998). Brazil abolishes “presumed consent” in organ donation. The Lancet 352 (9137): 1367.
Childress, James F. og Catharyn T. Liverman (red.) (2006). Organ donation: Opportunities for action. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Chouhan, Priyanka og Heather Draper (2003). Modified mandated choice for organ procurement. Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (3): 157–162.
Cotter, Hayley (2011). Increasing consent for organ donation: Mandated choice, individual autonomy, and informed consent. Health Matrix 21: 599.
Domínguez, Javier og José Luis Rojas (2013). Presumed consent legislation failed to improve organ donation in Chile. Transplantation Proceedings 45 (4): 1316–1317.
Gimbel, Ronald W. et al. (2003). Presumed consent and other predictors of cadaveric organ donation in Europe. Progress in Transplantation 13 (1): 17–23.
Halpern, David (2016). Inside the nudge unit: How small changes can make a big difference. London: Penguin.
Johnson, Eric J. og Daniel G. Goldstein (2004). Defaults and donation decisions. Transplantation 78 (12): 1713–1716.
Kelly, Jamie (2013). Libertarian paternalism, utilitarianism, and justice, pp. 216-230 i Christian Coons and Michael Weber (red.), Paternalism: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krekula, Linda Gyllström et al. (2009). From words to action – influence of two organ donation campaigns on knowledge and formal decision making. Clinical transplantation 23 (3): 343–350.
Le Grand, Julian og Bill New (2015). Government paternalism: Nanny state or helpful friend? New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Li, Danyang, Zackary Hawley og Kurt Schnier (2013). Increasing organ donation via changes in the default choice or allocation rule. Journal of Health Economics 32 (6): 1117–1129.
LSF 149 (1989). Forslag til lov om ligsyn, obduktion og transplantation m.v.
MacKay, Douglas og Alexandra Robinson (2016). The ethics of organ donor registration policies: Nudges and respect for autonomy. The American Journal of Bioethics 16 (11): 3–12.
Midtgaard, Søren Flinch (2014). Paternalisme, sundhedsfremme og lighed. Politica 14 (2): 170–186.
Midtgaard, Søren Flinch (2016). Paternalism. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ministry of Health NZ (2016). Review of deceased organ donation and transplantation. Ministry of Health NZ, Online im Internet: URL: http://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/hospitals-and-specialist-care/review-deceased-organ-donation-and-transplantation (20.08.2017).
Mossialos, Elias, Joan Costa-Font og Caroline Rudisill (2008). Does organ donation legislation affect individuals’ willingness to donate their own or their relative’s organs? Evidence from European Union survey data. BMC Health Services Research 8 (1).
NHS Blood and Transplant (2017). Organ Donation and Transplantation Activity Report 2016/17. https://nhsbtdbe.blob.core.windows.net/umbraco-assets-corp/4657/activity_report_2016_17.pdf
Organdonor.dk (2016). Tal og statistik over organdonation i Danmark. Organdonor.dk, http://organdonor.dk/tal-og-statistik/ (18.08.2017).
Palmer, Melissa (2012). Opt-out systems of organ donation: International evidence review. Welsh Government Social Research.
Pedersen, Viki M. L. og Soren Flinch Midtgaard (2017). Is anti-paternalism enough? Political Studies. doi.org/10.1177/0032321717734515
Rithalia, A. et al. (2009). Impact of presumed consent for organ donation on donation rates: A systematic review. BMJ 338 (jan14 2): a3162–a3162.
Rosenblum, Amanda M. et al. (2012a). The authority of next-of-kin in explicit and presumed consent systems for deceased organ donation: An analysis of 54 nations. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 27 (6): 2533–2546.
Rosenblum, Amanda M. et al. (2012b). Worldwide variability in deceased organ donation registries: Variability in deceased organ donation registries. Transplant International 25 (8): 801–811.
Scandiatransplant (2017). Transplantation and waiting list figures 2016. http://www.scandiatransplant.org/data/sctp_figures_2016_4Q.pdf
Shepherd, Lee, Ronan E. O’Carroll og Eamonn Ferguson (2014). An international comparison of deceased and living organ donation/transplant rates in opt-in and opt-out systems: a panel study. BMC Medicine 12 (1).
Shiffrin, Seana Valentine (2000). Paternalism, unconscionability doctrine, and accommodation. Philosophy & Public Affairs 29 (3): 205-250.
Spital, Aaron (1995). Mandated choice: A plan to increase public commitment to organ donation. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association, 273 (6): 504–506.
Spital, Aaron (1996). Mandated choice for organ donation: time to give it a try. Annals of internal medicine 125 (1): 66–69.
Sundhedsstyrelsen (2016). Organdonation 1995-2015. Danskernes viden, holdning og adfærd. https://www.sst.dk/da/udgivelser/2016/organdonation-1995-2015-danskernes-viden,-holdning-og-adfaerd
Sunstein, Cass R. (2015). Why nudge? The politics of libertarian paternalism. New Haven: Yale University Press. Storrs lectures on jurisprudence.
Sunstein, Cass R. (2016). The ethics of influence: Government in the age of behavioral science. New York: Cambridge University Press. Cambridge studies in economics, choice, and society.
Sunstein, Cass R. og Richard H. Thaler (2003). Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron. The University of Chicago Law Review 70 (4): 1159-1202.
Thaler, Richard H. (2009). Opting in vs. opting out. The New York Times, 26. september.
Thaler, Richard H. og Cass R. Sunstein (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. London: Penguin Books.
Thaysen, Jens Damgaard (2018). Lovens grænser, den sociale skævhed i valgdeltagelsen, og retfærdiggørelsen af stemmepligt. Politica 50 (2): 236-253.
The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology (2017). Increasing organ donation rates: is legislation enough? The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2 (4): 235.
Tsai, George (2014). Rational persuasion as paternalism. Philosophy & Public Affairs 42 (1): 78-112.
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (2016). https://www.organdonor.gov/statistics-stories/statistics.html (04.04.2017).
van Dalen, Hendrik P. og Kène Henkens (2014). Comparing the effects of defaults in organ donation systems. Social Science & Medicine 106: 137–142.
Veatch, Robert M. og Lainie Friedman Ross (2015). Transplantation ethics, 2. udg. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Wilkinson, Martin (2011). Ethics and the acquisition of organs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
LicensOphavsretten tilhører Politica. Materialet må ikke bruges eller distribueres i kommercielt øjemed.
