A Gramscian perspective on developmental work research: Contradictions, power and the role of researchers reconsidered
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/ocps.v14i2.9795Keywords:
developmental work research, expansive learning, hegemony, dialectical pedagogy, Engeström, GramsciAbstract
The article presents a Gramscian reading of organisational interventions within the framework ofdevelopmental work research. Developmental work research is based on Engeström’s concepts of
activity system and expansive learning cycle. It utilizes the theoretical vocabulary provided by
Marx and Ilyenkov and is situated in the traditions of cultural-historical and critical research. In
recent years, critical commentaries have pointed to a need to reconsider questions related to
transformation, contradictions and power within the approach. The Gramscian reading here
suggests that the concepts of transformism, hegemony and dialectic pedagogy could open potential
ways to reformulate certain elements of both the practice of organisational intervention and the
theoretical principles of developmental work research.
Downloads
Published
2013-10-07
How to Cite
Kontinen, T. (2013). A Gramscian perspective on developmental work research: Contradictions, power and the role of researchers reconsidered. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 14(2), 106–129. https://doi.org/10.7146/ocps.v14i2.9795
Issue
Section
Articles
License
From issue no. 1 2022 and onward, the journal uses the CC Attribution-NonCommercial- Share Alike 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) The authors retain the copyright to their articles.
The articles published in the previous 37 issues (From Vol. 1, no. 1, 1999 to Vol. 22, No. 1, 2021, are published according to Danish Copyright legislation. This implies that readers can download, read, and link to the articles, but they cannot republish these articles. The journal retain the copyright of these articles. Authors can upload them in their institutional repositories as a part of a green open access policy.