Cultural historical research in support of inclusive classrooms:

two approaches in dialogue

Authors

  • Inna Stepaniuk Simon Fraser University, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4258-8407
  • Beth Ferholt Brooklyn College, The City University of New York, United States

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/ocps.v26i.148597

Keywords:

cultural historical research, cultural-historical activity theory, romantic science, inclusive classrooms, playword, schools

Abstract

This article showcases the potential of dialogue within cultural historical research (CHR) to enhance our understanding of and advocacy for inclusivity in schools. It illustrates how the authors, each rooted in distinct subfields – cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) and romantic science – employ a unique approach to knowledge production regarding inclusive classrooms. By refraining from the pursuit of agreement and instead fostering an environment where their studies are juxtaposed, the authors engage in what they term “inclusive coauthoring,” approaching each other’s methodologies with an asset-based, solidarity-seeking stance. The first author utilizes excerpts from an ethnographic study in an elementary classroom to demonstrate how CHAT can elucidate the intricate dynamics of diverse classrooms, shedding light on mechanisms of inclusion/exclusion and identifying potential barriers (opportunities) to inclusive practices. On the other hand, the second author illustrates how a romantic science perspective can empower educators to cultivate inclusivity in ways previously unexplored before their deep engagement with the study. Uniting in collaboration around shared goals rather than shared methods, led the authors to unforeseen advancements, particularly in one of the studies.

References

Artiles, A. J. & Kozleski, E. B. (2007). Beyond convictions: Interrogating culture, history, and power in inclusive education. Language Arts, 84, 351-358.

Artiles, A. J. & Kozleski, E. B. (2016). Inclusive education’s promises and trajectories: Critical notes about future research on a venerable idea. Education Policy Analysis Archives/Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 24, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.1919

Artiles, A. J. (2015). Beyond responsiveness to identity badges: Future research on culture in disability and implications for response to intervention. Educational Review, 67(1), 1–22, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2014.934322

Artiles, A. J., Kozleski, E. B., & Waitoller, F. R. (2011). Inclusive education: Examining equity on five continents. Harvard Education Press.

Baglieri, S., Bejoian, L. M., Broderick, A. A., Connor, D. J., & Valle, J. (2011). [Re]claiming “inclusive education” toward cohesion in educational reform: Disability studies unravels the myth of the normal child. Teachers College Record, 113(10), 2122-2154.

Cakir, H. I., Bal, A., Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2022). Contradictions as an entry into inclusive systemic design: Addressing racial disparities in the discipline at an urban middle school. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 35, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100641

Cenci, A., Lemos, M. F., Bôas, D. F. V., Damiani, M. F., & Engeström, Y. (2020). The contradictions within inclusion in Brazil. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 24, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100375

Cole, M. (1991). A cultural theory of development: What does it imply about the application of scientific research? Learning and Instruction, 1, 187–200.

Daniels, H., Cole, M. & Wertsch, J.V. (Eds.) (2007). The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge University Press.

Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747

Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2011). Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts: A methodological framework. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 368-387.

Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2021). From mediated actions to heterogenous coalitions: Four generations of activity-theoretical studies of work and learning. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 28(1), 4-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2020.1806328

Ferholt, B. & Rainio, A. P. (2016). Teacher support of student engagement in early childhood: Embracing ambivalence through playworlds. Early Years – An International Research Journal 36(4), 413-425. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2016.1141395

Ferholt, B. (2009). Adult and child development in adult-child joint play: The development

of cognition, emotion, imagination and creativity in Playworlds [Doctoral dissertation, University of California San Diego, United States].

Ferholt, B. (2018). A synthetic-analytic method for the study of perezhivanie: Vygotsky’s literary analysis applied to playworlds. In C. Connery, V. John Steiner & A. Marjanovic-Shane (Eds.), Vygotsky and creativity: A cultural historical approach to play, meaning-making and the arts (2nd ed.), (pp. 163–180). Peter Lang.

Ferholt, B. (2019). A case study of a New York City elementary school’s adoption of the playworld activity. In M. Han & J. E. Johnson (Eds.), Play and curriculum: Play and culture studies, (Vol. 15). Hamilton Books.

Ferholt, B., Rainio A. P., & Lecusay R. (2023). Play pedagogy and playworlds. In R. E. Tremblay, M. Boivin, R. DeV Peters & P. K Smith (Eds.) Encyclopedia on early childhood development. https://www.chilencyclopedia.com/play/accordingexperts/play-pedagogy-and-playworlds.

Ferholt, B., Rainio, A. P., Watanabe, R., Miyazaki, K., Lecusay, R., Grankvist, A. K., Johansson, E., Thure, J. & Nilsson, M. (in press). Playworlds as ways of being: Romantic science of care, art and play. Brill.

Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032005019

Heidegger, M. (1962) Being and time. (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Harper &

Row.

Kozleski, E. B. (2011). Dialectical practices in education: Creating third spaces in the education of teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34(3), 250-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406411410077

Kozleski, E. B. (2020). Disrupting what passes as inclusive education: Predicating educational equity on schools designed for all. The Educational Forum, 84(4), 340-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2020.1801047

Kozleski, E. B., Artiles, A. J., & Waitoller, F. R. (2014). Equity in inclusive education: A cultural historical comparative perspective. In L. Florian (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of special education: Two volume set (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 231–250). SAGE. https://doi. org/10.4135/9781446282236.n16

Kozleski, E. B., Hunt, P., Mortier, K., Fleming, D., Stepaniuk, I., Balusubramanian, L., Leu, G., & Munandar, V. (2021). What peers, teachers, and principals say: Social validity in inclusive literacy instruction. Exceptional Children, 87(3), 289-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402920969184

Kozleski, E., Stepaniuk, I., & Proffitt, W. (2020). In the eye of the storm: When retreat is an unacceptable option. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 20(1), 16-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.56829/2158-396x-20.1.16

Lecusay, R., Rainio, A. P., & Ferholt, B. (2022). Caring about and with imaginary characters: Early childhood playworlds as sites for social sustainability. Sustainability, 14(9), 5533. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095533

Lee, C. D. (2003). Cultural modelling: CHAT as a lens for understanding instructional discourse based on African American English discourse patterns. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis B, V. S. Ageyev, S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 393-410). Cambridge University Press.

Leontiev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Progress.

Lindqvist, G. (1995). The aesthetics of play: A didactic study of play and culture in preschools [Doctoral dissertation, Uppsala University, Sweden].

Luria, A. R. (1976). The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology. Basic Books.

Maltese, A. V., Potvin, G., Lung, F. D., & Hochbein, C. D. (2014). STEM and STEM education in the United States. In B. Freeman, S. Marginson & R. Tytler (Eds.), Age of STEM: Educational policy and practice across the world in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (pp. 102-133). Routledge.

Marjanovic-Shane, A., Ferholt, B., Miyazaki, K., Nilsson, M., Rainio, A. P., Pesic, M. & Beljanski Ristic, L. (2011). Playworlds: An art of development. In C. Lobman & B. O’Neill (Eds.), Play and culture (Vol. 11, pp. 3–31). University Press of America.

Martínez-Álvarez, P. (2023). Redistribution of labor to prepare teachers to work in inclusive bilingual classrooms. Urban Education, 58(3), 457-489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085919873697

Naraian, S. (2011). Seeking transparency: The production of an inclusive classroom community. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(9), 955-973. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110903477397

Rainio, A. P. & Hilppö, J. (2017). The dialectics of agency in educational ethnography. Ethnography and Education, 12(1), 78-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2016.1159971

Rainio, A. P. & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2013). From ambivalence to agency: Becoming an author, an actor and a hero in a drama workshop. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2(2): 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2013.04.001

Rainio AP (2010) Lionhearts of the playworld: An ethnographic case study of the development of agency in play pedagogy. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki, Finland] http://hdl.handle.net/10138/19883

Rainio, A. P., Mälkki, K., Mäkinen, M. (2021). Embracing ‘the stranger’ in us: Heterogeneity and ambivalent ways of being in classrooms. In M. Talvio & K. Lonka (Eds.) International approaches to promoting social and emotional learning in schools: A framework for developing teaching strategy (pp. 15-36). Routledge.

Rinaldi, C. (2006). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching and learning. Routledge.

Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.

Sacks, O. (1991). Awakenings. Pan Macmillan.

Sannino, A., & Engeström, Y. (2018). Cultural-historical activity theory: Founding insights and new challenges. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 14(3), 43-56.

Skrtic, T. M. (1995). Disability and democracy: Reconstructing (special) education for postmodernity. Teachers College Press.

Stepaniuk, I. (2020) Lives in classrooms described as inclusive: From the stand-point of equity-based inclusive education. [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Kansas, United States]. ProQuest.

The Playworld of Creative Research (Ferholt, B., Lecusay, R., Rainio A. P., Baumer, S., Miyazaki, K., Nilsson, M, & Cohen, L.). (2021). Playworlds as ways of being: A chorus of voices. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 17(3), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2021170313

U.S. Department of Education (2022) Race and ethnicity of public school teachers. Retrieved July 9, 2023, from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2020/2020103/index.asp

U.S. Department of Education (2022) U.S. Department of Education launches new initiative to enhance STEM education for all students. Retrieved July 9, 2023, from https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/us-department-education-launches-newinitiative-enhance-stem-education-all-students

Verger, A., Parcerisa, L., & Fontdevila, C. (2019). The growth and spread of large-scale assessments and test-based accountabilities: A political sociology of global education reforms. Educational Review, 71(1), 5-30.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of LS Vygotsky: Problems of the theory and history of psychology (Vol. 3). Springer Science and Business Media.

Waitoller, F. R., & Kozleski, E. B. (2013). Working in boundary practices: Identity development and learning in partnerships for inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 31, 35-45.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-12

How to Cite

Stepaniuk, I., & Ferholt, B. (2024). Cultural historical research in support of inclusive classrooms:: two approaches in dialogue. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 26, 37–56. https://doi.org/10.7146/ocps.v26i.148597