Transgressing theory/practice divides through collaboration.
Building research communities with professionals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/ocps.v22i.134899Keywords:
Practice Research, Conflictual collaboration, Research collaboration, Transmethodology, Co-researchAbstract
This article contributes to discussions of transmethodology by drawing on experiences from conducting practice research aimed at the development of theory and practice through research collaboration. We analyze efforts to build research communities where researchers and professionals work together to perform analyses and develop knowledge. A collective research project exploring children’s possibilities for participation in school is used as a case for exploring how a research problem develops through such collabora-tion. This research project was designed to explore school life from the perspectives of children, parents, teachers, school leaders, and psychologists, and to analyze conflicts situated in everyday practices while considering political struggles concerning the school as a historical institution. The article emphasizes the often intangible and overlooked processes involved in research collaboration and details how we worked to build a re-search community comprising researchers and professionals that enabled collective mul-ti-perspective analyses. Building on a dialectical approach, we conceptualize conflicts as part of historical processes and as an immanent potentiality that arises from people’s engagement in common but contradictory matters. Hence, the different perspectives of those involved in children’s school life can be seen as linked through common matters, while also being differentiated by their allotted tasks in relation to children’s school life. This approach continuously challenged the researchers to analyze everyday conflicts grounded in the different perspectives of those involved, the different forms of reasoning, understandings, and standpoints, as well as how the different perspectives are connected through the participants’ engagement in a common matter – providing good schools for children. The article concludes by arguing that the discussed approach to theory devel-opment can be linked to a situated concept of generalization.
References
Axel, E. (2011). Conflictual cooperation. Nordic Psychology, 63(4), 56-78. https://doi.org/10.1027/1901-2276/a000045.
Axel, E. (2020). Distributing resources in a construction project: Conflictual co-operation about a common cause and its theoretical implications. Theory and Psychology, 30(3), 329-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320919501
Axel, E., & Højholt, C. (2019). Subjectivity, Conflictuality, and Generalization in Social Praxis. In C. Højholt & E. Schraube (Eds.), Subjectivity and Knowledge. Theory and History in the Human and Social Sciences (pp. 23-40). Springer.
Bagga-Gupta, S., & Dahlberg , G. M. (2021). On studying peoples’ participation across contemporary timespaces: Disentangling analytical engagement. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 22, 49–88. https://doi.org/10.7146/ocps.v22i.125861
Bergold, J., & Thomas, S. (2012). Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-13.1.1801
Bernstein, R. J. (1971). Praxis and action : Contemporary philosophies of human activity. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Chimirri, N. A., & Pedersen, S. (2019). Toward a transformative-activist co-exploration of the world? - Emancipatory co-research in Psychology from the Standpoint of the Subject. Annual Review of Critical Psychology,16, pp. 605-633.
Dreier, O. (2007). Generality and particularity of knowledge. In V. van Deventer, M. Terre Blanche, E. Fourie & P. Segalo (Eds.), Citizen city: Between constructing agent and constructed agent (pp. 188-196). Captus University Publications
Dreier, O. (2008). Psychotherapy in Everyday Life. Cambridge University Press.
Dreier, O. (2009). Persons in Structures of Social Practice. Theory & Psychology, 19(2), 193-212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309103539
Engsig, T. T., & C. J. Johnstone (2015). Is there something rotten in the state of Denmark? The paradoxical policies of inclusive education - lessons from Denmark International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(5), p. 469-486.
Gallagher, K. (2018). The methodological dilemma revisited: creative, critical and collaborative approaches to qualitative research for a new era. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315149325
Goulart, D. M., & Torres, J. F. P. (2021). Qualitative epistemology and constructive-interpretative methodology: contributions for research in social sciences and humanities. In D. M. Goulart, A. M. Martínez, & M. Adams (Eds.), Theory of Subjectivity within cultural-historical perspective: González Rey’s legacy. Springer Singapore.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist studies, 14(3), 575-599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.
Hodgetts, D.; Rua, M.; King, P., & Whetu, T. T. (2016). The Ordinary in The Extraordinary. Everyday Living Textured by Homelessness. In E. Schraube & C. Højholt (Eds.), Psychology and the conduct of Everyday Life (pp. 124-144). Routledge.
Holzkamp, K. (2013). Psychology: Social self-understanding and the reasons for action in everyday conduct of Life. In E. Schraube & U. Osterkamp (Eds.), Psychology from the Standpoint of the Subject. Selected Writings of Klaus Holzkamp (pp. 233-341). Palgrave Macmillan.
Højholt, C. (2022). Conflictuality and situated Inequality in Children’s School Life. Children's Geographies, 20(3), 297-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2020.1817335
Højholt, C., & Kousholt, D. (2014). Practice Research. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology (pp. 1485-1488). New York, NY: Springer New York.
Højholt, C., & Kousholt, D. (2018). Children Participating and Developing Agency in and Across Various Social Practices. In M. Fleer & B. van Oers (Eds.), International Handbook of Early Childhood Education (Vol. II, pp. 1581-1598). Springer.
Højholt, C., & Kousholt, D. (2019a). Parental collaboration in relation to children's school lives - advanced regulation or an opportunity for solidarity? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(8), 1048-1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2019.1635284
Højholt, C., & Kousholt, D. (2019b). Developing knowledge through participation and collaboration: Research as mutual learning processes. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 16, 575-604.
Højholt, C., & Kousholt, D. (2020). Dialectic and conflicts: Researching school as conflictual social practice. Theory & Psychology, 30(1), 36-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319884129.
Højholt, C. & Kousholt, D (forthcoming). Developing dialectic understandings through analyses of conflicts and contradictions. Contradictory conditions in the public school as a conflictual historical institution. In M. Franca, A. Gomes, D. Kousholt, J. Lave & L.L Mørck (Eds.). Critical Studies of Learning in transformation: Creating New Spaces of Difference and Equality
Højholt, C., & Larsen, M. R. (2021). Conflicts, situated inequality and politics of everyday life. Culture & Psychology, 27(4), 591-611. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X21989950
Jensen, U. J. (1999). Categories in activity theory: Marx's philosophy just-in-time. In S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard, & U. J. Jensen (Eds.), Activity Theory and Social Practice (pp. 79-99). Aarhus University Press.
Jensen, U. J. (2001). Mellem social praksis og skolastisk fornuft. In J. Myrup (Ed.), Temaer i nyere fransk filosofi (pp. 195-218). Philosophia.
Khawaja, I. & Kousholt, D. (2021). Transmethodology: Creating spaces for transgressive and transformative inquiry. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 22, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.7146/ocps.v22i.126190
Khawaja, I., & Mørck, L. L. (2022). Transmethodological mo(ve)ments: - creating a third space for emancipatory research . Outlines, 22, 265-303. https://tidsskrift.dk/outlines/article/view/133715/178812
Kousholt, D. (2016). Collaborative research with children: Exploring Contradictory Conditions of Conduct of Everyday Life. In E. Schraube & C. Højholt (Eds.), Psychology and the Conduct of Everyday Life (pp. 241-258). Routledge.
Kousholt, D. (2018). Family Problems: Exploring Dilemmas and Complexities of Organizing Everyday Family Life. Children, Childhood and Everyday Life. Children's Perspectives. K. Aronsson, M. Hedegaard, C. Højholt and O. S. Ulvik. Charlotte, NC, Information Age Publishing Inc.: 113-128.
Lave, J. (2011). Apprenticeship in Critical Ethnographic Practice. University of Chicago Press.
Lave, J. (2019). Learning and Everyday Life: Access, Participation, and Changing Practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1017/9781108616416
Mardahl-Hansen, T. (2018). Et hverdagsperspektiv på folkeskolelæreres arbejde med at skabe betingelser for børns deltagelse og læring i folkeskolen. [An everyday life perspective on teachers' work with creating conditions for children's participation and learning in school] Institut for Mennesker og Teknologi, Roskilde Universitet.
Mørck, L. L. & Huniche, L. (2006) ‘Critical Psychology in a Danish Context’, Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 5, https://discourseunit.com/annual-review/5-2006/.
Ollman, B. (2003). Dance of the dialectic: steps in Marx's method. University of Illinois Press.
Ollman, B. (2015). Marxism and the philosophy of internal relations; or, How to replace the mysterious ‘paradox’ with ‘contradictions’ that can be studied and resolved. Capital & Class, 39(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816814564128
Phillips, L., Kristiansen, M., Vehviläinen, M., & Gunnarsson, E. (Eds.). (2012). Knowledge and Power in Collaborative Research: A Reflexive Approach. Routledge.
Restler, V., Luttrell, W., & Chapin, D. (2021). A Place to Be Together: Cultivating Spaces of Discomfort and Not Knowing in Visual Analysis.: The Collaborative Seeing Studio. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 22(1), 23-48.
Rey, F. G., Martinez, A. M., & Goulart, D. M. (2019). Subjectivity Within Cultural-Historical Approach: Theory, Methodology and Research (5). Springer Singapore Pte. Limited.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4531523
Røn Larsen, M. (2018). Paradoxes of Inclusion: Administrative Procedures and Children’s Everyday Lives. I M. Hedegaard, K. Aronsson, C. Højholt, & O. S. Ulvik (red.), Children, Childhood, and Everyday Life: Children’s perspectives (chapter 2, p. 129-148). Information Age Publishing.
Schraube, E. (2015). Why theory matters: Analytical strategies of Critical Psychology. Estudos de Psicologia, 32, 533-545.
Schraube, E., & Højholt, C. (Eds.). (2016). Psychology and the conduct of everyday life. Routledge.
Schraube, E. & Osterkamp, U (Eds.). (2013). Psychology from the Standpoint of the Subject. Selected Writings of Klaus Holzkamp. Palgrave Macmillan.
Simovska, V., Lagermann, L. C., Abduljalil, H. S., Mørck, L. L., & Kousholt, D. (2019). Inside out: what we (don’t) talk about when we talk about research. Qualitative research: QR, 19(2), 113-130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117749165.
Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography. A sociology for people (Vol. 1). Altamira Press.
Stam, H. J. (2011). Wicked Problem and the Construction of Theory in Psychology. In P. Stenner, J. Cromby, J. Motzkau, J. Yen, & Y. Haosheng (Eds.), Theoretical Psychology. Global Transformation and Challenges (pp. 2-13). Captus University Publications.
Torre, M. E., Fine, M., Stoudt, B. G., & Fox, M. (2012). Critical participatory action research as public science. In APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. (pp. 171-184). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-011
Whyte, W. F. (Ed.). (1991). Participatory action research. SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
From issue no. 1 2022 and onward, the journal uses the CC Attribution-NonCommercial- Share Alike 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) The authors retain the copyright to their articles.
The articles published in the previous 37 issues (From Vol. 1, no. 1, 1999 to Vol. 22, No. 1, 2021, are published according to Danish Copyright legislation. This implies that readers can download, read, and link to the articles, but they cannot republish these articles. The journal retain the copyright of these articles. Authors can upload them in their institutional repositories as a part of a green open access policy.
