The messiness and orderliness of data-making in biodiversity citizen science

Börjesson, L., Huvila, I., and Sköld, O. (2022a). Information needs on research data creation. Information research, 27(Special Issue):isic2208.

Börjesson, L., Sköld, O., Friberg, Z., Löwenborg, D., Pálsson, G., and Huvila, (2022b). Re-purposing Excavation Database Content as Paradata: An Explorative Analysis of Paradata Identification Challenges and Opportunities. KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies, 6(3):1–18.

Ekström, B. (2022a). A niche of their own: Variations of information practices in biodiversity citizen science. Journal of Documentation, 78(7):248–265.

Ekström, B. (2022b). Trace data visualisation enquiry: A methodological coupling for studying information practices in relation to information systems. Journal of Documentation, 78(7):141–159.

Ekström, B. (2023). Thousands of examining eyes: Credibility, authority and validity in biodiversity citizen science data production. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 75(1):149–170.

Ekström, B. (2024a). No rose on this one?: Citizen science field excursion negotiations at the Great Alvar. Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies, 12(1).

Ekström, B. (2024b). Winding Paths to Species Reports: Information Practices in Biodiversity Citizen Science. Bibliotekshögskolan, Högskolan i Borås, Borås.

Faniel, I. M., Kriesberg, A., and Yakel, E. (2016). Social scientists’ satisfaction with data reuse. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(6):1404–1416.

Frohmann, B. (2014). Deflating Information: From Science Studies to Docu- mentation. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 2nd ed edition.

Geiger, R. S. and Ribes, D. (2011). Trace Ethnography: Following Coordi- nation through Documentary Practices. In 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pages 1–10, Kauai, HI. IEEE.

Huvila, I., Andersson, L., and Sköld, O., editors (2024). Perspectives on Para- data: Research and Practice of Documenting Process Knowledge, volume 13 of Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning. Springer International Publishing, Cham.

Huvila, I., Sköld, O., and Andersson, L. (2023). Knowing-in-Practice, Its Traces and Ingredients. In Cozza, M. and Gherardi, S., editors, The Posthumanist Epistemology of Practice Theory, pages 37–69. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham.

Lemieux, V. L., editor (2018). Building Trust in Information Perspectives on the Frontiers of Provenance. Springer International Publishing Springer, Cham, softcover reprint of the original 1st edition 2016 edition.

Rolland, B. and Lee, C. P. (2013). Beyond trust and reliability: Reusing data in collaborative cancer epidemiology research. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 435–444, San Antonio Texas USA. ACM.

Schuurman, N. (2008). Database Ethnographies Using Social Science Method- ologies to Enhance Data Analysis and Interpretation. Geography Compass, 2(5):1529–1548.

Sköld, O. (2013). Tracing traces: A document-centred approach to the preser- vation of virtual world communities. Information Research, 18(3).

Sköld, O. (2017). Getting-to-know: Inquiries, sources, methods, and the production of knowledge on a videogame wiki. Journal of Documentation, 73(6):1299–1321.

Yakel, E., Faniel, I. M., and Robert, L. P. (2024). An empirical examination of data reuser trust in a digital repository. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 75(8): 898–915.