Doctoral students’ reflection on Generative AI
A librarian outlook
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/njlis.v5i2.148803Keywords:
Gartners hype cycle, generative AI , information literacy, doctoral studentsAbstract
This practice paper explores doctoral students’ perspectives on the use of generative AI and examines the role of librarians as mediators in this evolving field. Originating from a long-standing doctoral course on information literacy at the Biomedical Library, University of Gothenburg, the study integrates recent advancements in generative AI tools for summarizing and analyzing scientific articles. During the spring semester of 2024, students were introduced to these tools and tasked with incorporating them into their course assignments. This paper analyzes the reflections and insights from these assignments, in the context of their diverse backgrounds from various medical disciplines. The findings provide a nuanced understanding of the students’ views on generative AI and underscore the importance of librarians in facilitating the adoption of new technologies in academic research. The study concludes with reflections on the implications for future course content and the role of librarians in supporting research through technological advancements.
References
Griffith University. (2024). Systematic quantitative literature review. https://www.griffith.edu.au/griffith-sciences/school-environment-science/research/systematic-quantitative-literature-review
Hessman, E., Sjöblom, H., Hammarbäck, L., & Viklund, S. (2024). Dataset for: Doctoral students’ reflection on Generative AI: A librarian outlook. [Dataset] Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.13474352
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research. 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
ICMJE International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2024). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html#four
Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical background and procedures. In: A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education: Advances in mathematics education (pp. 365-380). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_13
O’Leary, D. E. (2008). Gartner’s hype cycle and information system research issues. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 9(4), 240-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2008.09.001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Linda Hammarbäck, Helen Sjöblom, Sara Viklund, Eva Hessman

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.