Doctoral students’ reflection on Generative AI

A librarian outlook

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/njlis.v5i2.148803

Keywords:

Gartners hype cycle, generative AI , information literacy, doctoral students

Abstract

This practice paper explores doctoral students’ perspectives on the use of generative AI and examines the role of librarians as mediators in this evolving field. Originating from a long-standing doctoral course on information literacy at the Biomedical Library, University of Gothenburg, the study integrates recent advancements in generative AI tools for summarizing and analyzing scientific articles. During the spring semester of 2024, students were introduced to these tools and tasked with incorporating them into their course assignments. This paper analyzes the reflections and insights from these assignments, in the context of their diverse backgrounds from various medical disciplines. The findings provide a nuanced understanding of the students’ views on generative AI and underscore the importance of librarians in facilitating the adoption of new technologies in academic research. The study concludes with reflections on the implications for future course content and the role of librarians in supporting research through technological advancements.

References

Griffith University. (2024). Systematic quantitative literature review. https://www.griffith.edu.au/griffith-sciences/school-environment-science/research/systematic-quantitative-literature-review

Hessman, E., Sjöblom, H., Hammarbäck, L., & Viklund, S. (2024). Dataset for: Doctoral students’ reflection on Generative AI: A librarian outlook. [Dataset] Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.13474352

Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research. 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi:10.1177/1049732305276687

ICMJE International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2024). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html#four

Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical background and procedures. In: A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education: Advances in mathematics education (pp. 365-380). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_13

O’Leary, D. E. (2008). Gartner’s hype cycle and information system research issues. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 9(4), 240-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2008.09.001

Downloads

Published

2025-05-28

How to Cite

Hammarbäck, L., Sjöblom, H., Viklund, S., & Hessman, E. (2025). Doctoral students’ reflection on Generative AI : A librarian outlook. Nordic Journal of Library and Information Studies, 5(2), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.7146/njlis.v5i2.148803