Det performative samspil mellem digital infrastruktur og kulturelle arrangementer i den professionelle praksis i danske folkebiblioteker

Authors

  • Trine Schreiber Institut for Kommunikation, Københavns Universitet
  • Camilla Moring Institut for Kommunikation, Københavns Universitet

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/njlis.v4i2.142276

Keywords:

Public libraries, digital infrastructure, cultural activities, agential realism, entanglement, material-discursive practices, professional work

Abstract

The aim of the study is to examine the recursive intertwining of humans and technology in practice in Danish public libraries. Drawing on Karen Barad´s theory of agential realism, the paper suggests that the public library is investigated not through an ontology of separateness between digital infrastructure and cultural activities, but through a relational view focusing on their constitutive entanglements. The empirical focus in the article is on material-discursive practices of professionals in Danish public libraries and consist of qualitative interviews with 32 professionals from 10 Danish public libraries carried out in autumn 2022. Through a material-discursive lens of entanglement, the study analyses the narratives of the professionals when describing their libraries and their work practices.

Based on the empirical material two themes are chosen for closer consideration. One theme is 'Cultural events, book exhibitions and front-line services´, while the other is ´Statistics of library loans and purchases of materials'. In the first theme, the digital infrastructure appears as a passive information resource. Due to budget cuts and importance of what the professionals articulate as "the institutional visibility", the digital infrastructure stays in the background in favor of cultural activities. In the second theme, it becomes clear that the digital infrastructure is no longer passive, but on the contrary very controlling for a number of practices, e.g. managing the collection, organizing the physical library and predicting users´ needs. By focusing on material-discursive practices, it becomes possible to articulate these differences and their implications. The paper concludes that the chosen analytical lens of entanglement helps to address essential consequences of digitalization, and hereby contributes to discussions of future institutional strategies for Danish public libraries.

References

Aabø, S. (2005). The role and the value of public libraries in the age of digital technologies. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 37(4), 205-211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000605057855

Aabø, S & Audunson, R. (2012). Use of library space and the library as place. Library and Information Science Research, 34, 138-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2011.06.002

Adrian, S.W. (2014). Naturligvis? Når lys, hunde og kønsceller sætter nature til forhandling på fertilitetsklinikken. Kulturstudier, 5(1), 103-127. https://doi.org/10.7146/ks.v5i1.18618

Adrian, S.W. (2016). Nymaterielle teorier: Karen Barad. I: Schiermer, B. (red), Kulturteori og kultursociologi. Hans Reitzels Forlag.

Audunson, R.; Hobohm, H.-C. & Tóth, M. (2020). LAM professionals and the Public Sphere. How do librarians, archivists and museum professionals conceive the respective roles of their institutions in the public sphere? In: Audunson, R.; Andresen, H.; Fagerlid, C.; Henningsen, E.; Hobohm, H.-C.; Jochumsen, H.; Larsen, H. & Vold, T. (Eds.), Libraries, archives and museums as democratic spaces in a digital age. Walter De Gruyter: Open Access E-Books.

Audunson, R.; Aabø, S.; Blomgren, R.; Evjen, S.; Jochumsen, H.; Larsen, H.; Rasmussen, C. H.; Vårheim, A.; Johnston, J. & Koizumi, M. (2019). Public libraries as an infrastructure for a sustainable public sphere. A comprehensive review of research. Journal of Documentation, 75(4), 773-790. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2018-0157

Barad, K. (1998). Getting real: Technoscientific practices and the materialization of reality. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 10(2), 87-128.

https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822388128-007

Barad, K. (2003). Performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801-831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together - apart. Parallex, 20(3), 168-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2014.927623

Betænkning om bibliotekerne i informationssamfundet (1997). Udvalget om Bibliotekerne i informationssamfundet. UBIS. København: Kulturministeriet. Betænkning nr. 1347.

Biblioteksloven (2000). Lov om biblioteksvirksomhed. https://danskelove.dk/biblioteksloven

Bille, M. & Sørensen, T.F. (2018). Materialitet: en indføring i kultur, identitet og teknologi. Samfundslitteratur.

Boudreau, M-C.; Serrano, C. & Larson, K. (2014). IT-driven identity work: Creating a group identity in a digital environment. Information and Organization, 24, 1-24.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.11.001

Buschman, J. (2003). Dismantling the Public Sphere: Situating and Sustaining Librarianship in the Age of the New Public Philosophy. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.

Carlsson, H. (2015). Researching public libraries and the social web, 2006-2012. Journal of Documentation, 71(4), 632-649. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2014-0046

Colbjørnsen, T.; Brenna, B., & Edquist, E. (2023). Curating collections in LAMs. In: Rasmussen, C.H.; Rydbeck, K.; & Larsen, H. (Eds.), Libraries, archives, and museums in transition. Changes, challenges, and convergence in a Scandinavian perspective. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, s.87-99.

Coleman, C.N. (2020). Managing bias when library collections become data. International Journal of Librarianship, 5(1), 8-19. https://doi.org/10.23974/ijol.2020.vol5.1.162

Czarniawska, B. (2020). Narratologi og feltstudier. I: Brinkmann, S. & Tanggaard, l. (red.), Kvalitative metoder: en grundbog. 3.udgave, Hans Reitzels, Forlag, kap.14, s.347-375.

Danmarks Statistik (2023). Hver fjerde lånte fra biblioteket i 2022. Danmarks Statistik, 23.3.2023, https://via.ritzau.dk/pressemeddelelse/hver-fjerde-lante-fra-biblioteket-i-2022?publisherId=3274962&releaseId=13674729 (tilgængelig 12.09.23).

Digitaliseringsstyrelsen (2002). På vej mod den digitale forvaltning – vision og strategi for den offentlige sektor. København: Digitaliseringsstyrelsen.

Folkebibliotekerne i vidensamfundet (2010). Rapport fra Udvalget om folkebibliotekerne i vidensamfundet. København: Styrelsen for Bibliotek og Medier.

Grøn, R. (2010). Oplevelsens rammer. Former og rationaler i den aktuelle formidling af skønlitteratur for voksne på danske folkebiblioteker. PhD-afhandling. København: Det Informationsvidenskabelige akademi.

Grøn, R. (2014). Folkebiblioteket som oplevelsessted – Hjørring Bibliotek. I: Jantzen, C. (red.) Oplevelsesstedet. Tekstanalytiske tilgange til oplevelsesdesigns. MÆRKK – Æstetik og kommunikation, nr.03. Systime, kap.9, s.201-218.

Grøn, R. & Balling, G. (2016). Kampen om eReolen: Biblioteker, bogmarked og framing af det litterære kredsløb. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Informationsvidenskab og Kulturformidling, 5(3), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.7146/ntik.v5i3.25789

Hanell, F. & Ahlryd, S. (2023). Information work of hospital librarians: Making the invisible visible. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 55(1), 70-83.

https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006211063202

Hansson, J. (2010). Libraries and Identity: The Role of Institutional Self-Image and Identity in the Emergence of New Types of Libraries. Oxford: Chandos.

Hylland, O.M.; Kann-Rasmussen, N.; & Vårheim, A. (2023). LAMs as objects of knowledge and cultural policy. In: Rasmussen, C.H.; Rydbeck, K.; & Larsen, H. (eds.), Libraries, archives, and museums in transition. Changes, challenges, and convergence in a Scandinavian perspective. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, s.57-70.

Huvila, I.; Holmberg, K.; Kronqvist-Berg, M.; Nivakoski, O, & Widén, G. (2013). What is libraian 2.0 – New competencies or interactive relations? A library professional viewpoint. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 45(3), 198-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000613477122

Johnston, J.; Pálsdóttir, Á.; Mierzecka, A.; Audunson, R.A.; Hobohm, H.-C.; Rydbeck, K.; Tóth, M.; Rasmussen, C.H.; Jochumsen, H.; Khosrowjerdi, M. & Evjen, S. (2022). Public librarians´ perception of their professional role and the library´s role in supporting the public sphere: a multi-country comparison. Journal of Documentation, 78(5), 1109-1130. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-09-2021-0178

Jochumsen, H. (2016). Biblioteksmodeller til tiden. Dorte Skot-hansen og biblioteksudviklingen. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Informationsvidenskab og Kulturformidling, 5(2), 45-50.

https://doi.org/10.7146/ntik.v5i2.25864

Jochumsen, H. (2017). Biblioteket gennem 100 år – indhold, rammer og relationer. I: Laskie, C. (red), Biblioteksdidaktik. Hans Reitzels Forlag, s.17-48.

Juelskjær, M. (2011). Kvantefysiske subjekter. Ny-materialisme og studier af subjektivering i tid og rum. Nordiske Udkast, 38(1-2), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.7146/nu.v38i1.133858

Juelskjær, M. (2019). At tænke med agential realisme. Nyt fra samfundsvidenskaberne. Samfundslitteratur.

Kann-Christensen, N. & Balling, G. (2011). Literature promotion in public libraries – between policy, profession and public management. Nordisk Kulturpolitisk Tidskrift, 14(1-2), 100-119. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN2000-8325-2011-01-02-0

Liljegren, L. (2022). Easier material management – at what cost? Librarians meet IMMS. Nordic Journal of Library and Information Studies, 3(2), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.7146/njlis.v3i2.128547

Lykke, N. (2019). Ny feminisme II: Intersektionalitet, materialitet og kritikken af tokønssystemet. I: Eriksson, B. & Schiermer, B. (red) Ny kulturteori. Hans Reitzels Forlag, s.549-578.

Mathiasson, M. H. (2020). From means to an end to ends in themselves: an empirical study of the development of public library programmes in Denmark between 1960 and 2020. Nordic Journal of Library and Information Studies. 1(2), 34-52. https://doi.org/10.7146/njlis.v1i2.121806

Nyhlén, S. & Gidlund, K.L. (2019). Lost in translation – How policy enactment get stuck in the digital fix. Nordisk Kulturpolitisk Tidsskrift, 22(2), 295-311. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2000-8325/-2019-02-06

Orlikowski,W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28, 1435-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138

Orlikowski, W. J. (2010). The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 125-141.

https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep058

Orlikowski, W. J. & Scott, S. V. (2015). Exploring material-discursive practices. Journal of Management Studies, 52(5), 697-705. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12114

Ormes, S. (1998). Internet services in Danish public libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 30(2), 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/096100069803000204

Plesner, U. & Husted, E. (2020). Digital organizing. Revisiting themes in organization studies. Macmillan International Higher Education. Red Globe Press.

Rasmussen, C. H., Jochumsen, H., Audunson, R., Aabø, S., Blomgren, R., Ejven, S., Jahnsen, H., Larsen, H., Ødemark, I. L., Johnston, J., & Koizumi, M. (2019). Public libraries as an infrastructure for a sustainable public sphere: A comprehensive review of research. Journal of Documentation, 75(4), 773-790. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2018-0157

Robinson, C. K. (2009). Library Space in the Digital Age: The Pressure Is On. Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances, 22(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.1108/08880450910955369

Ross, L. & Sennyey, P. (2008). The Library Is Dead, Long Live the Library! The Practice of Academic Librarianship and the Digital Revolution. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(2), 145–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.12.006

Roued-Cunliffe, H., Valtysson, B., & Colbjørnsen, T. (2023). Digital communication in LAMs. In: Rasmussen, C.H.; Rydbeck, K.; & Larsen, H. (Eds.), Libraries, archives, and museums in transition. Changes, challenges, and convergence in a Scandinavian perspective. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, s.130-143.

Sauzet, S. (2015). Versioner. Diffraktive analyser af tværprofessionalismens tilblivelse som fænomen I professionshøjskolen. PhD-afhandling, Aarhus Universitet, Institut for Uddannelse og Pædagogik (DPU).

Schiermer, B. (2019). Ny materialisme. I: Eriksson, B. & Schiermer, B. (red), Ny kulturteori. Hans Reitzels Forlag, 663-698.

Skot-Hansen, D.; Rasmussen, C.H. & Jochumsen, H. (2013). The role of public library in culture-led urban regeneration. New Library World, 114(1-2), 7-19.

https://doi.org/10.1108/03074801311291929

Skøtt, B. (2021). Democracy, digitisation and public libraries. Digital Library Perspectives, 37(3), 305-323. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-11-2020-0118

Skøtt, B. (2022). Digital dissemination skills in public libraries. Digital Library Perspectives, 38(3), 301-317. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-03-2021-0018

Söderholm, J. & Nolin, J. (2015). Collections redux: The public library as a place of community borrowing. The Library Quarterly, 85(3), 244-260.

Sørensen, A.S.; Høystad, O.M.; Bjurstöm, E. & Vike, H. (2010). Nye kulturstudier: teorier og temaer. Tiderne Skifter.

Thorhauge, J. (2016). Omkring modelprogrammets tilblivelse og funktion. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Informationsvidenskab og Kulturformidling, 5(2), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.7146/ntik.v5i2.25860

Thorhauge, J. & Andresen, L. (2023). Biblioteksstyrelsen og det digitale paradigmeskift 1997-2011. Dansk Bibliotekshistorisk Selskab. Bibliotekshistorie, 15, 80-110.

Wandi, C. (2019). Change management in public libraries: Seven recommendations from Copenhagen libraries. Journal of Library Administration, 59(8), 915-926. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2019.1661746

Downloads

Published

2023-12-22

How to Cite

Schreiber, T., & Moring, C. (2023). Det performative samspil mellem digital infrastruktur og kulturelle arrangementer i den professionelle praksis i danske folkebiblioteker. Nordic Journal of Library and Information Studies, 4(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.7146/njlis.v4i2.142276