Supporting diamond open access journals

Interest and feasibility of direct funding mechanisms


  • Quentin Dufour École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France
  • David Pontille Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, France
  • Didier Torny Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, France



Article processing charges, Diamond Open Access, Diamond OA journals, Funding mechanisms, Research funding organizations, Sustainability


As Article Processing Charges (APC) has been a growing concern in academia and policy making, the need for a model where both authors and readers do not pay – the so-called Diamond, or non-APC model – is regularly called for. However, this call is often combined with questions about its sustainability, particularly in financial terms. To answer this concern, this article explores the practical conditions to implement a direct funding mechanism to Diamond open access journals, that is recurrent money provided by funders to support the publication process. Based on a questionnaire survey sent to more than 1,000 Diamond OA journals, it investigates their financial needs, as well as their capacity to interact with research funding organizations (RFOs). The results are structured around four issues regarding the implementation of a direct funding model. First, most Diamond OA journals already make use of money rather than exclusively relying on support and volunteering. Second, those needs would be fulfilled in the eventuality of a regular income from research funders. Third, under this hypothesis, a vast majority of Diamond OA journals can receive and spend money. Finally, most of these journals could develop funding acknowledgments for each article with the promise of regular income through a direct funding mechanism. The conclusion addresses the challenges that such a recurrent financial stream would spur.


Álvarez-Bornstein, B., & Montesi, M. (2021). Funding acknowledgements in scientific publications: A literature review. Research Evaluation, 29(4), 469–488.

Ancion, Z., Borrell-Damián, L., Mounier, P., Rooryck, J., & Saenen, B. (2022). Action Plan for Diamond Open Access.

Anderson, K. (2018, February 6). Focusing on Value—102 Things Journal Publishers Do (2018 Update). The Scholarly Kitchen.

Becerril, Arianna, Bosman, Jeroen, Bjørnshauge, Lars, Frantsvåg, Jan Erik, Kramer, Bianca, Langlais, Pierre-Carl, Mounier, Pierre, Proudman, Vanessa, Redhead, Claire, & Torny, Didier. (2021). OA Diamond Journals Study. Part 2: Recommendations. Zenodo.

Bosman, J., Frantsvåg, J. E., Kramer, B., Langlais, P.-C., & Proudman, V. (2021). OA Diamond Journals Study. Part 1: Findings. Zenodo.

Collins, E. (2013). Publishing priorities of biomedical research funders: Table 1. BMJ Open, 3(10), e004171.

Contat, O., & Gremillet, A.-S. (2015). Publier: À quel prix ? Étude sur la structuration des coûts de publication pour les revues françaises en SHS. Revue Française Des Sciences de l’information et de La Communication, 7.

Cronin, B., & Weaver, S. (1995). The praxis of acknowledgement: From bibliometrics to influmetrics. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 18(2), 172–177.

Crow, R., Gallagher, R., & Naim, K. (2020). Subscribe to Open: A practical approach for converting subscription journals to open access. Learned Publishing, 33(2), 181–185.

Ellers, J., Crowther, T. W., & Harvey, J. A. (2017). Gold Open Access Publishing in Mega-Journals: Developing Countries Pay the Price of Western Premium Academic Output. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 49(1), 89–102.

Estelle, L., & Wise, A. (2023). OASPA Equity in Open Access Workshop 1 Report. Zenodo.

Fuchs, C., & Sandoval, M. (2013). The diamond model of open access publishing: Why policy makers, scholars, universities, libraries, labour unions and the publishing world need to take non-commercial, non-profit open access serious. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 11(2), Article 2.

Fyfe, A., Moxham, N., McDougall-Waters, J., & Mork Rostvik, C. (2022). A History of Scientific Journals. Publishing at the Royal Society, 1665-2015. UCL Press.

Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10, 20.

Khoo, S. Y.-S. (2019). Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis. LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries, 29(1), 1–18.

Laakso, M., Solomon, D., & Björk, B.-C. (2016). How subscription-based scholarly journals can convert to open access: A review of approaches. Learned Publishing, 29(4), 259–269.

Ma, L., Buggle, J., & O’Neill, M. (2023). Open access at a crossroads: Library publishing and bibliodiversity (1). 36(1), Article 1.

Miedema, Frank, Verbeke, Demmy, Sondervan, Jeroen, Woutersen-Windhouwer, Saskia, & Oort, Frans. (2020). Beyond APC: On the Need for Diamond Open Access Publication Platforms.

Morrison, H., Borges, L., Zhao, X., Kakou, T. L., & Shanbhoug, A. N. (2022). Change and growth in open access journal publishing and charging trends 2011–2021. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73(12), 1793–1805.

Mounier, P. (2012). Freemium as a sustainable economic model for open access electronic publishing in humanities and social sciences1. Information Services & Use, 31(3–4), 225–233.

Pooley, J. (2021). Collective Funding to Reclaim Scholarly Publishing. Commonplace.

Rieck, K. (2019). The FWF’s Open Access Policy over the last 15 Years – Developments and Outlook. Mitteilungen Der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen Und Bibliothekare, 72(2), 408–423.

Ross-Hellauer, T., Reichmann, S., Cole, N. L., Fessl, A., Klebel, T., & Pontika, N. (2022). Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: A scoping review. Royal Society Open Science, 9(1), 211032.

Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C. K., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2021). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s “Mirror Journal” system. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(4), 1123–1143.

Solomon, D. J., & Björk, B.-C. (2012). Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 98–107.

Suber, P. (2012). Open Access (the book)—Harvard Open Access Project. MIT Press.

Tang, L., Hu, G., & Liu, W. (2017). Funding acknowledgment analysis: Queries and caveats. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(3), 790–794.

Taubert, N., Sterzik, L., & Bruns, A. (2023). Mapping the German Diamond Open Access Journal Landscape (arXiv:2306.13080). arXiv.

The Budapest Open Access Initiative:20th Anniversary Recommendations. (2022).

The Council of the European Union. (2023). High-quality, transparent, open, trustworthy and equitable scholarly publishing (9616/23).

Verbeke, D., & Mesotten, L. (2022). Library funding for open access at KU Leuven. Insights, 35(0), Article 0.

Waidlein, N., Wrzesinski, M., Dubois, F., & Katzenbach, C. (2021). Working with budget and funding options to make open access journals sustainable. Zenodo.

Walt Crawford. (2023). Gold Open Access 2017-2022: Articles in Journals (GOA8).

Wise, A., & Estelle, L. (2019). How libraries can support society publishers to accelerate their transition to full and immediate OA and Plan S. Insights, 32(1).

Wise, A., & Estelle, L. (2020). How society publishers can accelerate their transition to open access and align with Plan S. Learned Publishing, 33(1), 14–27.

Yang, A., Asa, N., Krause, A., Stewart, B., & Farley, A. (2023). Policy opportunities: Economics of academic publishing.




How to Cite

Dufour, Q., Pontille, D., & Torny, D. (2023). Supporting diamond open access journals: Interest and feasibility of direct funding mechanisms. Nordic Journal of Library and Information Studies, 4(2), 35–55.