Simple questions for complex matters?
An enquiry into Swedish Google search queries on wind power
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/njlis.v4i1.136246Keywords:
information seeking, wind power, renewable energy, environmental information, search engines, search queries, information practicesAbstract
Renewable energy sources have emerged as a current subject matter in Sweden amidst discussions regarding energy costs, climate change and development of energy production. This study explores how Google Search is used for seeking information about wind power and how utilised search queries contribute to the understanding of this energy source. Adopting a practice theoretical perspective, the study explores search queries as doings and sayings, and understands search engines as an established part of everyday routinised information seeking-activities. Data collection was carried out in a trace ethnographic vein through the automatic retrieval of search queries enacted between November 2021 and October 2022. Through a digital methods approach, the search queries were analysed and visualised according to their prevalence and character string composition. A qualitative, multiple coding approach was moreover used for the identification and interpretation of themes and subthemes. The results show that geographical locations, wind power functions and small wind turbines comprise the most prominent subthemes of the search queries. This is replicated also in the search term frequencies, providing further insights to queries related to wind turbine’s efficiency as well as subthemes of advantages and disadvantages. Moreover, the study shows the tendency to phrase search queries as simple questions for complex matters, with nuances being lost in the pursuit of austere, uncomplicated answers. Altogether, the results contribute to a wider understanding of how environmental information seeking is conducted today.
References
Aitken, M. (2010). Why we still don’t understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literature. Energy Policy, 38(4), 1834–1841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.060
Andersson, C. (2020). Searching and deleting: Youth, impression management and online traces of search. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 72(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-05-2019-0129
Anshelm (2013). Kraftproduktion och miljöopinion: Kritiken av vindkraftens miljöpåverkan och den som riktats mot övriga kraftslag. Naturvårdsverket. https://www.naturvardsverket.se/globalassets/media/publikationer-pdf/6500/978-91-620-6571-3.pdf
Auerbach, C., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis (Vol. 21). NYU press.
Barbour, R. S. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ, 322(7294), 1115–1117. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115
Bjärstig, T., Mancheva, I., Zachrisson, A., Neumann, W., & Svensson, J. (2022). Is large-scale wind power a problem, solution, or victim? A frame analysis of the debate in Swedish media. Energy Research & Social Science, 83, 102337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102337
Bolin, K., Hammarlund, K., Mels, T. & Westlund, H. (2021). Vindkraftens påverkan på människors intressen [Elektronisk resurs] Uppdaterad syntesrapport 2021. https://www.naturvardsverket.se/globalassets/media/publikationer-pdf/7000/978-91-620-7013-7.pdf
Borch, K., Munk, A. K., & Dahlgaard, V. (2020). Mapping wind-power controversies on social media: Facebook as a powerful mobilizer of local resistance. Energy Policy, 138, 111223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111223
Energimyndigheten. (2021). Vindkraftens resursanvändning. Underlag till Nationell strategi för en hållbar vindkraftsutbyggnad. Ett livscykelperspektiv på vindkraftens resursanvändning och växthusgasutsläpp. Eskilstuna.
Feinerer, I., Hornik, K., & Artifex Software Inc. (2022). tm: Text Mining Package (0.7–10). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tm
Fellows, I. (2018). wordcloud: Word Clouds (2.6). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=wordcloud
Geiger, R. S., & Ribes, D. (2011). Trace ethnography: Following coordination through documentary practices. System Sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–10.
Haider, J., Ekström, B., Tattersall Wallin, E., Gunnarsson Lorentzen, D., Rödl, M., & Söderberg, N. (n.d.). Tracing online information about wind power in Sweden: An exploratory quantitative study of broader trends. Mistra Environmental Communication [Report manuscript].
Haider, J., & Rödl, M. (2023). Google Search and the creation of ignorance: The case of the climate crisis. Big Data & Society, 10(1), 20539517231158996. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231158997
Haider, J., & Sundin, O. (2019). Invisible search and online search engines: The ubiquity of search in everyday life. Routledge.
Haider, J., & Sundin, O. (2022). Paradoxes of media and information literacy: The crisis of information. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003163237
Hindmarsh, R. (2014). Hot air ablowin! ‘Media-speak’, social conflict, and the Australian ‘decoupled’ wind farm controversy. Social Studies of Science, 44(2), 194–217.
Jönsson, E. (2022). Vindkraftsopinionen i skuggan av ett vindkraftverk. In U. Andersson, H. Oscarsson, B. Rönnerstrand, & N. Theorin (Eds.), Du sköra nya värld (pp. 215–230). SOM-institutet, Göteborgs universitet.
Karakislak, I., Hildebrand, J., & Schweizer-Ries, P. (2021). Exploring the interaction between social norms and perceived justice of wind energy projects: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.2020631
Karasmanaki, E. (2022). Is it safe to live near wind turbines? Reviewing the impacts of wind turbine noise. Energy for Sustainable Development, 69, 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2022.05.012
Metcalf, J., & Crawford, K. (2016). Where are human subjects in Big Data research? The emerging ethics divide. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 205395171665021. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716650211
Lewandowski, D., Sünkler, S. (2012). Relevance Assessment Tool. Ein Werkzeug zum Design von Retrievaltests sowie zur weitgehend automatisierten Erfassung, Aufbereitung und Auswertung von Daten. In: Ockenfeld, M.; Weller, K.; Peters, I. (Eds.). Social Media und Web Science: Das Web als Lebensraum. Proceedings der 2. DGI-Konferenz, 237–249.
Lewandowski, D. & Sünkler, S. (2013). Designing search engine retrieval effectiveness tests with RAT. Information Services & Use, 33(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-130691
Lewandowski, D. & Sünkler, S. (2019). Das Relevance Assessment Tool. Eine modulare Software zur Unterstützung bei der Durchführung vielfältiger Studien mit Suchmaschinen. Information – Wissenschaft & Praxis, 70(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1515/iwp-2019-0007
Lindström, O. (2022, June 15). Vindkraften tappar i opinionen. Svenska Dagbladet. https://www.svd.se/a/rEx3L8/vindkraften-tappar-i-opinionen
Marres, N. (2017). Digital Sociology: The Reinvention of Social Research. Polity.
Neuwirth, E. (2022). RColorBrewer: ColorBrewer Palettes (1.1-3). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RColorBrewer
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.
Pilerot, O and Lindberg, J. (2018). Inside the library: Academic librarians’ knowing in practice. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 50(3): 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618769970
Pritchard, D. (2013). What is this thing called knowledge?. (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Rogers, R. (2019). Doing digital methods. SAGE.
Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. Pennsylvania State University Press.
StatCounter. (2023). Search engine market share worldwide. StatCounter global stats. https://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share (Retrieved February 8th, 2023).
Sundin, O., Haider, J., Andersson, C., Carlsson, H., & Kjellberg, S. (2017). The search-ification of everyday life and the mundane-ification of search. Journal of Documentation, 73(2), 224–243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2016-0081
Wickham, H., Chang, W., Henry, L., Pedersen, T. L., Takahashi, K., Wilke, C., Woo, K., Yutani, H., Dunnington, D., & RStudio. (2022). ggplot2: Create Elegant Data Visualisations Using the Grammar of Graphics (3.4.0). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggplot2
Wickham, H., Bryan, J., RStudio, Kalicinski, M., Komarov, V., Leitienne, C., Colbert, B., Hoerl, D., & Miller, E. (2022). readxl: Read Excel Files (1.4.1). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=readxl
Wickham, H. & RStudio. (2022). tidyverse: Easily Install and Load the ‘Tidyverse’ (1.3.2). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyverse
Wizelius, T. (2015). Vindkraft i teori och praktik (3rd ed.). Lund.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Björn Ekström, Elisa Tattersall Wallin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
