Publication practices in the Humanities
An in-depth case study of a Swedish Arts and Humanities Faculty 2010-2018
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/njlis.v2i2.125238Keywords:
humanities, research evaluation, publication practices, scientific communication, bibliometrics, research policyAbstract
This paper is a case study of research publication practices at the Faculty of Arts and Humanities at Linnaeus University, a young, mid-sized university in the south-east of Sweden. Research output was measured from publications in the local institutional repository following the guidelines of local research policy as defined in university documentation. The data collection comprised 3,316 metadata records of publications self-registered by authors affiliated with the faculty during the period of 2010–2018. A statistical analysis of research output was conducted, focusing on preferred publication types, disciplinary specificity, level of co-authorship, and the language of the publication as registered in the local repository. The analysis focused on two main research questions: 1) how do the local research practices stand in relation to traditional publication patterns in the humanities? 2) how do the observed publication patterns relate to local university policy on publication and research evaluation? The empirical results suggest a limited correlation between publication practices and research incentives from university management, a finding that is corroborated by previous research on the scholarly character of the humanities and university policies. Overall, traditional humanities publication patterns were largely maintained throughout the period under investigation.
References
Aagaard, K. (2015). How incentives trickle down: Local use of a national bibliometric indicator system. Science and Public Policy, 45(5), 725–737. http://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu087
Ahlgren, P., Colliander, C., & Persson, O. (2012). Field normalized rates, filed normalized journal impact and Norwegian weights for allocation of university funds. Scientometrics, 92(3), 767–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0632-x
Borgman, C. (2007). Scholarship in the digital age: information, infrastructure, and the Internet. MIT Press.
Budd, J. M., & Dumas, C. (2014). Epistemic multiplicity in iSchools: Expanding knowledge through interdisciplinarity / La multiplicité épistémique dans les iSchools: le développement des connaissances grâce à l’interdisciplinarité. Canadian Journal of Library and Information Science, 38(4), 276–286. https://doi.org/10.1353/ils.2014.0020
Bunia, R. (2016). Quotation statistics and culture in literature and in other humanist disciplines: What citation indices measure. In M. Ochsner, S. E. Hug, & H.-D. Daniel (Eds.), Research assessment in the humanities: towards criteria and procedures (pp. 133–148). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4_11
Burroughs, J. M. (2017). No uniform culture: Patterns of collaborative research in the humanities. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 17(3), 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2017.0032
Carlsson, H., Kettis, Å., & Söderholm, A. (2014). Research quality and the role of university leadership. The Association of Higher Swedish Education. https://suhf.se/app/uploads/2019/07/Expertgruppen-kvalitet-2010-2011-Bilaga-4-Research-Quality-and-the-Role-of-the-University-Leadership.pdf
De Silva, P. U. K., & Vance, C. K. (2017). Scientific scholarly communication: the changing landscape. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50627-2
de Solla Price, D. J. (1963). Little Science, Big Science. Columbia University Press.
de Solla Price, D. J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510–515. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.149.3683.510
East, J. W. (2007). Subject retrieval from full-text databases in the humanities. Portal: libraries and the academy, 7(2), 227–241. http://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2007.0018
European Science Foundation. (2014, July 9). European Reference Index of the Humanities (ERIH). http://archives.esf.org/hosting-experts/scientific-review-groups/humanities-hum/erih-european-reference-index-for-the-humanities.html
Franssen, T., & Wouters, P. (2019). Science and its significant other: Representing the humanities in bibliometric scholarship. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(10), 1124–1137. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24206
Golub, K., Tyrkkö, J., Hansson, J. & Ahlström, I. (2020). Subject indexing in humanities: A comparison between a local university repository and an international bibliographic service. Journal of Documentation, 76(6), 1193-1214. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2019-0231
Guns, R., Eykens, J., & Engels, T. C. E. (2019). To what extent do successive cohorts adopt different publication patterns? Peer review, language use and publication types in the social sciences and humanities. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 3, Article 38. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2018.00038
Hammarfelt, B., & de Rijcke, S. (2015). Accountability in context: Effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University. Research Evaluation, 24(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvu029
Hammarfelt, B., Nelhans, G., Eklund, P., & Åström, F. (2016). The heterogeneous landscape of bibliometric indicators: Evaluating models for allocating resources at Swedish universities. Research Evaluation, 25(3), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv040
Hammarfelt, B. (2016). Beyond coverage: towards a bibliometrics for the humanities. In M. Ochsner, S. E. Hug, & H.-D. Daniel (Eds.), Research assessment in the humanities: towards criteria and procedures (pp. 115–131). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4_10
Kennerly, M., Frederick, S., & Abel, J. E. (Eds.). (2021). Information: Keywords. Columbia University Press.
Narayan, B., Luca, E. J., Tiffen, B., England, A., Booth, M., & Boateng, H. (2018). Scholarly communication practices in humanities and social sciences: a study of researchers’ attitudes and awareness of Open Access. Open Information Science, 2(1), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2018-0013
Schneider, J. W. (2009). An outline of the bibliometric indicator used for performance-based funding of research institutions in Norway. European Political Science, 8(3), 364–378. https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2009.19
Siemens, L. (2009). ‘It’s a team if you use “reply all”’: An exploration of research teams in digital humanities environments. Literary and Linguistics Computing, 24(2), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqp009
Siemens, L., Cunningham, R., Duff, W., & Warwick, C. (2011). A tale of two cities: Implication of the similarities and differences in collaborative approaches within digital libraries and digital humanities communities. Literary and Linguistics Computing, 26(3), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqr028
Sīle, L., & Vanderstraeten, R. (2019). Measuring changes in publication patterns in a context of performance-based research funding systems: The case of educational research in the University of Gothenburg (2005–2014). Scientometrics, 118(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2963-8
Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures and the scientific revolution. Cambridge University Press.
Statistics Sweden. (2016). Standard för svensk indelning av forskningsämnen 2011; uppdaterad augusti 2016. Statistiska Centralbyrån. https://www.scb.se/contentassets/10054f2ef27c437884e8cde0d38b9cc4/standard-for-svensk-indelning--av-forskningsamnen-2011-uppdaterad-aug-2016.pdf
Tang, M. C., Cheng, Y. J., & Chen, K. H. (2017). A longitudinal study of intellectual cohesion in digital humanities using bibliometric analyses. Scientometrics, 113, 985–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2496-6
Tibbo, H. R. (1994). Indexing for the humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(8), 607–619. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199409)45:8%3C607::AID-ASI16%3E3.0.CO;2-X
Universitets- og høgskolerådet. (2004). Vekt på forskning: Nytt system for dokumentasjon av vitenskapelig publisering: Innstilling fra faglig og teknisk utvalg til UHR. Universitets- og høgskolerådet. https://npi.nsd.no/informasjon#vektpa
Utbildningsdepartementet. (2008). Ett lyft för forskning och innovation (Regeringens proposition 2008/09:50). Regeringskansliet. https://data.riksdagen.se/fil/F4F66159-F5A7-424E-9E60-4AF83790C165
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Joacim Hansson, Jukka Tyrkkö, Koraljka Golub, Ida Ahlström
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
