Kontaktperson for abonnementer E-mail: mona@ind.ku.dk For nærmere om abonnement på MONA gå til http://www.ind.ku.dk/mona/abonnement
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Artikler

Nr. 2 (2024)

Natur/teknologi og nordiske elevers miljø- og klimabevidsthed

Submitted
June 4, 2024
Published
2024-06-05

Abstract

Dette studie undersøger sammenhænge mellem undervisning i natur/teknologi og miljø- og klimabevidsthed blandt 4.-klasseelever i de nordiske lande. Analyser gennemføres på data fra TIMSS 2019, hvor der indgår en skala for elevernes miljø- og klimabevidsthed, som er associeret til viden og kognitive færdigheder indenfor emnet. Resultaterne viser en positiv korrelation og fremhæver natur/teknologis potentiale til at øge miljø- og klimabevidsthed. Derudover viser resultaterne at elevers miljø og
klimabevidsthed generelt er højere hvis de kan lide at lære natur/teknologi, og hvis deres fagligeselvtillid er høj. Intraklassekorrelationsanalyser viser variation i hvor meget vægt de enkelte skoler og lærere lægger på undervisningen i klima- og miljøspørgsmål. Studiet finder ingen kønsforskelle, men derimod markante forskelle på elevers miljø- og klimabevidsthed afhængigt af socioøkonomisk baggrund.

References

  1. Bailey, P., Emad, A., Huo, H., Lee, M., Liao, Y., Lishinski, A., Nguyen, T., Xie, Q., Yu, J., Zhang, T., Buehler, E., Lee, S.-J. & Webb, B. (2023). Package ‘EdSurvey’. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/EdSurvey/EdSurvey.pdf
  2. Bailey, P., Emad, A., Zhang, T., Xie, Q. & Sikali, E. (2018). Weighted and Unweighted Correlation Methods for Large-Scale Educational Assessment: wCorr Formulas. AIR-NAEP Working Paper #2018‑01. NCES Data R Project Series #02. American Institutes for Research.
  3. Christensen, J.H. (2022). Iagttagelse af tegn på læring via mixed methods – en tilgang for undersøgelse af effektfuldhed. I: J.H. Christensen & L. Qvortrup (red.), Kausalitet og effektfuldhed i pædagogisk forskning og praksis (s. 141‑178). Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
  4. EMU. (2023). Grundskole. https://emu.dk/grundskole
  5. Fougt, S., Neubert, K., Kristensen, R.M., Gabrielsson, R.H., Molbæk, L. & Kjeldsen, C.C. (2023). Danske elevers læsekompetence i 4. klasse – resultater af PIRLS-undersøgelsen 2021. Aarhus Universitetsforlag. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.3850481
  6. Fransson, N. & Gärling, T. (1999). Environmental Concern: Conceptual Definitions, Measurement Methods, and Research Findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(4), 369‑382. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0141
  7. Gericke, N., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Berglund, T. & Olsson, D. (2019). The Sustainability Consciousness Questionnaire: The Theoretical Development and Empirical Validation of an Evaluation Instrument for Stakeholders Working with Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development, 27(1), 35‑49. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1859
  8. Hadzigeorgiou, Y. & Skoumios, M. (2013). The Development of Environmental Awareness through School Science: Problems and Possibilities. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 8(3), 405‑426. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1016851.pdf
  9. Higgs, A.L. & McMillan, V.M. (2006). Teaching through Modeling: Four Schools’ Experiences in Sustainability Education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38(1), 39‑53. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.38.1.39‑53
  10. Jones, C.A. & Davison, A. (2021). Disempowering Emotions: The Role of Educational Experiences in Social Responses to Climate Change. Geoforum, 118, 190‑200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.11.006
  11. Kauffman, N. & Hill, K. (2021). Climate Change, Adaptation Planning and Institutional Integration: A Literature Review and Framework. Sustainability, 13(19), artikel 10708. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910708
  12. Kjeldsen, C.C., Kristensen, R.M. & Christensen, A.A. (2020). Matematik og natur/teknologi i 4. klasse – resultater af TIMSS-undersøgelsen 2019. Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
  13. Krogh, L.B., Dolin, J. & Petersen, M.R. (2022). De vigtigste udfordringer i det danske naturfagsdidaktiske felt. MONA, 2022(2), 24‑42. https://tidsskrift.dk/mona/article/view/132756/177878
  14. Lee, B.X., Kjaerulf, F., Turner, S., Cohen, L., Donnelly, P.D., Muggah, R., Davis, R., Realini, A., Kieselbach, B., MacGregor, L.S., Waller, I., Gordon, R., Moloney-Kitts, M., Lee, G. & Gilligan, J. (2016). Transforming Our World: Implementing the 2030 Agenda through Sustainable Development Goal Indicators. Journal of Public Health Policy, 37, 13‑31. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271‑016‑0002‑7
  15. Littledyke, M. (2008). Science Education for Environmental Awareness: Approaches to Integrating Cognitive and Affective Domains. Environmental Education Research, 14(1), 1‑17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701843301
  16. Liu, S. & Guo, L. (2018). Based on Environmental Education to Study the Correlation between Environmental Knowledge and Environmental Value. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 3311‑3319. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91246
  17. Martin, M.O., von Davier, M. & Mullis, I.V.S. (red.). (2020). Methods and Procedures: TIMSS 2019 Technical Report. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/methods/pdf/TIMSS-2019-MP-Technical-Report.pdf
  18. McKinley, D.C., Miller-Rushing, A.J., Ballard, H.L., Bonney, R., Brown, H., Cook-Patton, S.C., Evans, D.M., French, R.A., Parrish, J.K., Phillips, T.B., Ryan, S.F., Shanley, L.A., Shirk, J.L., Stepenuck, K.F., Weltzin, J.F., Wiggins, A., Boyle, O.D., Briggs, R.D., Chapin, S.F., Hewitt, D.A., Preuss, P.W. & Soukup, M.A. (2017). Citizen Science Can Improve Conservation Science, Natural Resource Management, and Environmental Protection. Biological Conservation, 208, 15‑28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.015
  19. Mislevy, R.J., Beaton, A.E., Kaplan, B. & Sheehan, K.M. (1992). Estimating Population Characteristics from Sparse Matrix Samples of Item Responses. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29(2), 133‑161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745‑3984.1992.tb00371.x
  20. Monroe, M.C., Plate, R.R., Oxarart, A., Bowers, A. & Chaves, W.A. (2019). Identifying Effective Climate Change Education Strategies: A Systematic Review of the Research. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 791‑812. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842
  21. Mullis, I.V.S. & Martin, M.O. (2017). TIMSS 2019 Assessment Frameworks. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/frameworks/
  22. Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 International Results in Mathematics and Science. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/international-results/
  23. Nguyen, T. & Kelley, C. (2018). Methods Used for Estimating Mixed-Effects Models in EdSurvey. American Institutes for Research. https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/EdSurvey-Mixed_Models.pdf
  24. R Core Team. (2023). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
  25. Reynolds, K.A. & Komakhidze, M. (2022). TIMSS 2023 Assessment Frameworks. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2023/frameworks/pdf/T23-Environmental-Attitudes-and-Behaviors-Framework.pdf
  26. Rogayan, J.D.V. & Nebrida, E.E.D. (2019). Environmental Awareness and Practices of Science Students: Input for Ecological Management Plan. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 9(2), 106‑119. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1219420.pdf
  27. Rutkowski, L., von Davier, M. & Rutkowski, D. (2013). Handbook of International Large-Scale Assessment: Background, Technical Issues, and Methods of Data Analysis. CRC Press.
  28. Sánchez, J.M. & Lafuente, R. (2010). Defining and Measuring Environmental Consciousness. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 68(3), 731‑755. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2008.11.03
  29. Sukma, E., Ramadhan, S. & Indriyani, V. (2020). Integration of Environmental Education in Elementary Schools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1481(1), artikel 012136. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742‑6596/1481/1/012136
  30. Susongko, P. & Afrizal, T. (2018). The Determinant Factors Analysis of Indonesian Students Environmental Awareness in PISA 2015. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 407‑419. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.10684
  31. Tireli, Ü. & Jacobsen, J.C. (2021). Klimaaktivisme – for en kritisk pædagogik i skolen. Nordic Studies in Education, 41(1), 46‑61. https://doi.org/10.23865/nse.v41.2250
  32. Turrini, T., Dörler, D., Richter, A., Heigl, F. & Bonn, A. (2018). The Threefold Potential of Environmental Citizen Science: Generating Knowledge, Creating Learning Opportunities and Enabling Civic Participation. Biological Conservation, 225, 176‑186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.024
  33. Uitto, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J. & Saloranta, S. (2015). Participatory School Experiences as Facilitators for Adolescents’ Ecological Behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 55‑65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.007
  34. United Nations. (2015) Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf
  35. United Nations. (2021). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2021. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2021/
  36. United Nations. (2023). Conferences | Environment and Sustainable Development. https://www.un.org/en/conferences/environment
  37. von Davier, M. (2020). TIMSS 2019 Scaling Methodology: Item Response Theory, Population Models, and Linking Across Modes. I: M.O. Martin, M. von Davier & I.V.S. Mullis (red.), Methods and Procedures: TIMSS 2019 Technical Report (s. 11.1‑11.25). International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
  38. Voulvoulis, N. & Burgman, M.A. (2019). The Contrasting Roles of Science and Technology in Environmental Challenges. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 49(12), 1079‑1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2019.1565519
  39. Wagemaker, H. (2020). Reliability and Validity of International Large-Scale Assessment: Understanding IEA’s Comparative Studies of Student Achievement. Springer Nature.
  40. Wagner, J. & Hastedt, D. (2022). Valuing Curriculum-Based International Large-Scale Assessments: Ensuring Alignment with National Curricula in IEA Studies. IEA Compass: Briefs in Education No. 16. IEA. https://online.flippingbook.com/view/163945639
  41. Wals, A.E., Brody, M., Dillon, J. & Stevenson, R.B. (2014). Convergence between Science and Environmental Education. Science, 344(6184), 583‑584. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250515
  42. Waltner, E.M., Rieß, W. & Mischo, C. (2019). Development and Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Student Sustainability Competencies. Sustainability, 11(6), artikel 1717. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061717
  43. Yin, L. & Foy, P. (2020). Constructing the TIMSS 2019 Environmental Awareness Scales. I: M.O. Martin, M. von Davier & I.V.S. Mullis (red.), Methods and Procedures: TIMSS 2019 Technical Report (s. 18.1‑18.30). International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/methods/chapter-18.html
  44. Zsóka, Á., Szerényi, Z.M., Széchy, A. & Kocsis, T. (2013). Greening Due to Environmental Education? Environmental Knowledge, Attitudes, Consumer Behavior and Everyday Pro-Environmental Activities of Hungarian High School and University Students. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 126‑138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.030