Nøgleord
Grundskole
børns perspektiver
God til naturfag
kvalitativ forskning
Citation/Eksport
Resumé
Som en del af forskningsprojektet SCOPE har vi interviewet børn fra 6. klasse for bedre at forstå deres oplevelser med naturfag. I denne artikel forfølger jeg børnenes perspektiver. Jeg undersøger, hvad de mener der skal til for at være god til natur/teknologi. Fire overordnede temaer gik igen i deres svar, nemlig det, jeg har valgt at kalde at være en god elev, at vide noget, at være interesseret, og at det var uklart. Ved at trække på begreberne science-kapital og felt udfolder jeg børnenes perspektiver og undersøger, hvilke ressourcer de oplever det kræver at være god til natur/teknologi.
Referencer
Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Godec, S., King, H., Mau, A., Nomikou, E. & Seakins, A. (2017). Killing curiosity? An analysis of celebrated identity performances among teachers and students in nine London secondary science classrooms. Science Education, 101(5), 741-764. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21291
Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Seakins, A. & Wong, B. (2015). Science capital: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 922-948. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21227
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Godec, S., Henderson, M., Holmegaard, H., Liu, Q., MacLeod, E., Mendick, H., Moote, J. & Watson, E. (2023). ASPIRES 3: Young people’s STEM trajectories, age 10-22. UCL.
Archer, L., Godec, S. & Julie Moote. (2022). Chapter 2: “My love for it just wasn’t enough to get me through”: A longitudinal case study of factors supporting and denying black british working-class young women’s science identities and trajectories. I H.T. Holmegaard & L. Archer (red.), Science identities: Theory, method and research (bd. 12, s. 23-45). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17642-5
Archer, L., Moote, J., MacLeod, E., Francis, B. & DeWitt, J. (2020). ASPIRES 2: Young people’s science and career aspirations, age 10-19. UCL.
Barton, A.C. & Yang, K. (2000). The culture of power and science education: Learning from Miguel. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 871-889. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200010)37:8%3C871::AID-TEA7%3E3.0.CO;2-9
Bentzen, A. (2006). Skal man være nørd for at blive dygtig fysikstuderende? MONA, 2006(4), 41-55. https://tidsskrift.dk/mona/article/view/36523/37826
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. I J.G. Richardson (red.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (s. 241-258). Greenwood Press.
Bourdieu, P. & Wacquant, L.J.D. (2009). Refleksiv sociologi: Mål og midler. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Broch, T. & Egelund, N. (2001). Elevers interesse for naturfag og teknik – et elevperspektiv på undervisningen. DPU.
Børne- og Undervisningsministeriet. (2019). Natur/teknologi – faghæfte 2019. https://emu.dk/sites/default/files/2020-09/Gsk_fagh%C3%A6fte_naturteknologi.pdf
Carlone, H.B. (2022). Chapter 1: Understanding and contextualizing the field of science identity research. I H.T. Holmegaard & L. Archer (red.), Science identities: Theory, method and research (bd. 12, s. 3-20). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17642-5
Croll, P. (2008). Occupational choice, socio‐economic status and educational attainment: A study of the occupational choices and destinations of young people in the British Household Panel Survey. Research Papers in Education, 23(3), 243-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701755424
DeWitt, J. & Archer, L. (2015). Who aspires to a science career? A comparison of survey responses from primary and secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 37(13), 2170-2192. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1071899
DeWitt, J., Archer, L. & Mau, A. (2016). Dimensions of science capital: Exploring its potential for understanding students’ science participation. International Journal of Science Education, 38(16), 2431-2449. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1248520
DeWitt, J., Archer, L. & Osborne, J. (2013). Nerdy, brainy and normal: Children’s and parents’ constructions of those who are highly engaged with science. Research in Science Education, 43(4), 1455-1476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9315-0
Emerson, R.M., Fretz, R.I. & Shaw, L.L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2. udgave). TheUniversity of Chicago Press.
Gertz, E., Madsen, L.M. & Holmegaard, H.T. (2024). “It’s not like I go oh that’s really exciting”: A qualitative study of upper secondary school students’ identity negotiations in physics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23, 713-736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10483-1
Godec, S., King, H. & Archer, L. (2017). The Science Capital Teaching Approach: Engaging students with science, promoting social justice. UCL. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10080166/1/the-science-capital-teaching-approach-pack-for-teachers.pdf
Gonsalves, A.J. & Danielsson, A.T. (red.). (2020). Physics education and gender: Identity as an analytic lens for research (bd. 19). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41933-2
Hasse, C. (2002). Kultur i bevægelse: Fra deltagerobservation til kulturanalyse – i det fysiske rum. Samfundslitteratur.
Holmegaard, H. & Johannsen, B.F. (2022). Chapter 6: Science talent and unlimited devotion: An investigation of the dynamics of university students’ science identities through the lens of gendered conceptualisations of talent. I Henriette Holmegaard & L. Archer (red.), Science identities: Theory, method and research (bd. 12, s. 113-140). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17642-5
Hoppe, E.E. & Holmegaard, H.T. (2022). Art-based methods in science education research: A systematic review of their prevalence and an analysis of their potentials in addressing complex questions. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 18(3), 323-336. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.9242
Hoppe, E.E. & Holmegaard, H.T. (2024). Unveiling the production of non-participation in the primary school science classroom. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 19, 387-416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-024-10220-8
Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse –Ikke-kommerciel (by-nc).
Copyright (c) 2025 MONA - Matematik- og Naturfagsdidaktik