The Devil Is in the Details: The Trouble with Memorialising the Salem Witch Trials

Authors

  • Nikoline Koldbæk Aarhus University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/lev112026167520

Keywords:

Salem, memorialisation, memory activism, witchcraft

Abstract

The Salem Witch Trials were North America’s deadliest witch-hunt, resulting in at least twenty-five deaths and hundreds of accusations. While historians have extensively studied the trials themselves, comparatively less attention has been paid to how Salem has publicly remembered this dark chapter in its history – and how it has not. This article examines the 1992 Salem Witch Trials Memorial as a contested site of civic memory, analysing inscriptions, protest posters by local contemporary witches, and media coverage. It argues that the memorial attempts to restore the victims’ moral and historical dignity within a Puritan ethical framework, yet provokes challenges from modern witch communities who reject its portrayal of witchcraft as inherently evil and Satanic. These debates reveal broader struggles over memory, tourism, authority, and the ethics of commemorating historical injustice. 

References

Assmann, Jan.“Collective Memory and Cultural Identity.” New German Critique, no. 65, 1995. doi:10.2307/488538.

Baker, Emerson W. A Storm of Witchcraft : The Salem Trials and the American Experience, Oxford University Press, Incorporated, 2014. ProQuest Ebook Central.

Bruce, Brown. “A Cauldron of Controversy.” Washington Post, September 13, 1992. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1992/09/13/a-cauldron-of-controversy/1bd6d d24-602c-4f20-b273-4a9a0acb2cb9/.

Driscoll, Anne. “For Salem, a Reminder of a Dark Past.” The New York Times, October 30, 1988. https://www.nytimes.com/1988/10/30/us/for-salem-a-reminder-of-a-dark-past.html.

Gutman, Y., & Wüstenberg, J. (2021). “Challenging the meaning of the past from below: A typology for comparative research on memory activists”. Memory Studies, 15(5), 1070-1086. doi:10.1177/17506980211044696.

Haskell, David H. “Witches Claim Harassment by Zealots.” United Press International, July 9, 1992.https://www.upi.com/Archives/1992/07/09/Witches-claim-harassment-by-zealots/2308710654400/.

Lush, Rebecca. “WITCH MEMORIES REMAIN: A LANDSCAPE HISTORY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS”, International Academic Conference, Miami, 2016 doi: 10.20472/IAC.2016.021.022.

“Mary Perkins Bradbury Charged as a Witch.” Historic Ipswich (June 21, 2021). https://historicipswich.net/2021/06/21/mary-perkins-bradbury-charged-as-a-witch/.

Nora, Pierre. “Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire.” Representations, no. 26 (1989): 7–24. doi:10.2307/2928520.

Ricoeur, Paul: “Memory, History, Forgetting”, THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS, 2004 doi:10.5195/jffp.2005.247.

Rebecca Nurse Homestead, Homage to a Victim of the Salem Witch Trials. (n.d.). New England Historical Society. https://newenglandhistoricalsociety.com/rebecca-nurse-homestead-homage-to-a-victim-of-the-salem-witch-trials/.

Roach, Marilynne K. The Salem Witch Trials: A Day-by-Day Chronicle of a Community Under Siege, Taylor Trade Publishing, 1997.

Salem Witch Museum - YouTube. (2022, October 5). Memorializing the Salem Witch Trials [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEup5Pkif7E (12:15).

“Salem Witch Trials.” Encyclopædia Britannica. Accessed December 22nd 2025. https://www.britannica.com/event/Salem-witch-trials.

“Salem Witch Trials — Legal Resources.” University of Chicago Library. https://www.lib.uchicago.edu/collex/exhibits/salem-witch-trials-legal-resources/.

“Salem Witch Trials Memorial.” Smithsonian Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage Magazine. https://folklife.si.edu/magazine/salem-witch-trials-memorial.

Stewart, Hannah, and Philip R. Stone. 2024. “‘Haunted Happenings’: Dark Tourism Events and Supernatural Placemaking in Salem, USA.” Revenant Journal 11 (2024): 37–58. https://www.revenantjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Stewart-and-Stone_SEPT-2024-1.pdf.

Wasserman, Judith. ”To Trace the Shifting Sands: Community, Ritual, and the Memorial Landscape.” Landscape Journal 17, 1998. doi:10.3368/lj.17.1.42.

Wasserman, Judith. ‘Retail or Re-Tell?: The Case of the Salem Tercentennial Memorial.’ Landscape Journal 22, 2003 doi:10.3368/lj.22.1.1.

Weir, Robert Eugene. “Bewitched and Bewildered: Salem Witches, Empty Factories, and Tourist Dollars.” Historical journal of Massachusetts 40, 2012.

https://www.westfield.ma.edu/historical-journal/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/bewitched-and-bewildered.pdf.

Wilson, Deirdre. “Salem Witches Feeling Neglected.” UPI Archives, October 30, 1991. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1991/10/30/Salem-witches-feeling-neglected/7434688798800.

Young, James E. “The Counter-Monument: Memory against Itself in Germany Today.” Critical Inquiry 18, no. 2 (1992): 267–96. doi:10.1086/448632.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-06

How to Cite

Koldbæk, N. (2026). The Devil Is in the Details: The Trouble with Memorialising the Salem Witch Trials . Leviathan: Interdisciplinary Journal in English, (11), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.7146/lev112026167520

Issue

Section

Articles