Obscurantism in Academic Writing
What It Is and Why It Is Bad
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/lev92023136279Keywords:
obscurantism, academic writing, communication, Popper, LacanAbstract
Obscure academic writing is vague, ambiguous, jargon-filled, or otherwise difficult to interpret. Obscurantists use such writing to hide the shallowness or incoherence of their ideas. There is value in being able to see through their attempts so that one does not waste one’s time on, for example, the psychoanalytic verbiage of Jacques Lacan. Therefore, this article identifies five recognizable characteristics of obscure—and especially of obscurantist—academic writing. Specifically, obscurantists tend to (1) fail to distinguish between truistic and radical versions of their claims, (2) employ paradoxical formulations, (3) avoid giving examples of their ideas (4), overuse abstract nouns, and (5) insist on their own lucidity. The article concludes by suggesting that the deepest problem with obscure academic writing is that it insulates arguments and theories from criticism.
References
Angelova, Emilia. 2006. “Quasi-Cause in Deleuze: Inverting the Body without Organs.” Symposium 10 (1): 117–133. doi:10.5840/symposium200610110.
Blake, William. 2008. Blake’s Poetry and Designs. Edited by Mary L. Johnson and John E. Grant. New York: W. W. Norton.
Boudry, Maarten, and Filip Buekens. 2015. “The Dark Side of the Loon: Explaining the Temptations of Obscurantism.” Theoria 81 (2): 126–142. doi:10.1111/theo.12047.
Butler, Judith. 1997. “Further Reflections on Conversations of Our Time.” Diacritics 17 (1): 13–15. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/further-reflections-on-conversations-our-time/docview/1297855407/se-2.
Carroll, Joseph. 1995. Evolution and Literary Theory. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
Davis, Colin. 2020. “Trauma, Poststructuralism and Ethics.” In The Routledge Companion to Literature and Trauma, edited by Colin Davis and Hanna Meretoja, 36–44. London: Routledge.
Dennett, Daniel. 2013. Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking. New York: W. W. Norton.
Evans, Dylan. 2005. “From Lacan to Darwin.” In The Literary Animal: Evolution and the Nature of Narrative, edited by Jonathan Gottschall and David Sloan Wilson, 48–55. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Foot, Philippa. 2002. “The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect.” In Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy, 19–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fry, Paul H. 1995. A Defense of Poetry: Reflections of the Occasion of Writing. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
Graham, Daniel W. 2021. “Heraclitus.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/heraclitus.
Greene, Brian. 2012. “Welcome to the Multiverse.” Newsweek, May 21, 2012. https://www.newsweek.com/brian-greene-welcome-multiverse-64887.
Hills, Matt. 2005. The Pleasures of Horror. London: Continuum.
Irigaray, Luce. 1985. This Sex Which Is Not One. Translated by Catherine Porter and Carolyn Burke. New York: Cornell University Press.
Ivanković, Viktor. 2016. “Steering Clear of Bullshit? The Problem of Obscurantism.” Philosophia 44: 531–546. doi:10.1007/s11406-016-9709-8.
Jameson, Fredric. 2011. Signatures of the Visible. New York: Routledge.
Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kukla, André. 2000. Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge.
Lacan, Jacques. 1970. “Of Structure as an Inmixing of an Otherness Prerequisite to Any Subject Whatever.” In The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man, edited by Richard Macksey and Eugenio Donato, 186–200. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Lacan, Jacques. 1992. Book VII: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: The Ethics of Psychoanalysis. Translated by Denis Porter. New York: W. W. Norton.
Lacan, Jacques. 1999. On Feminine Sexuality: The Limits of Love and Knowledge. Book xx, translated by Bruce Fink. W. W. Norton.
Lacan, Jacques. 2007. Écrits. Translated by Bruce Fink. New York: W. W. Norton.
Latour, Bruno. 2000. “On the Partial Existence of Existing and Nonexisting Objects.” In Biographies of Scientific Objects, edited by Lorraine Daston, 247–269. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Leahy, D. G. 1996. Foundation: Matter the Body Itself. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Leavy, Stanley A. 1983. “The Image and the Word: Further Reflections on Jacques Lacan.” In Interpreting Lacan, edited by Joseph H. Smith and William Kerrigan, 3–20. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Pinker, Steven. 2014. The Sense of Style: The Thinking Person’s Guide to Writing in the 21st Century. New York: Penguin.
Popper, Karl. 1983. “The Problem of Demarcation.” In A Pocket Popper, edited by David Miller, 118–30. London: Fontana.
Popper, Karl. 1985. “Knowledge without Authority.” In Popper Selections, edited by David Miller, 46–57. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Popper, Karl. 1996. In Search of a Better World: Lectures and Essays from Thirty Years. Translated by Laura J. Bennett. New York: Routledge.
Popper, Karl. 2002. The Poverty of Historicism. New York: Routledge.
Popper, Karl. 2013. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ragland, Ellie. 2011. “The Practice of the Letter and Topological Structure.” French Literature Series 38: 31–53. doi:10.1163/9789401207591_003.
Reinhard, Kenneth. 2017. Introduction to There’s No Such Thing as a Sexual Relationship: Two Lessons on Lacan, by Alain Badiou and Barbara Cassin, ix–xxvii. Translated by Kenneth Reinhard and Susan Spitzer. New York: Columbia University Press.
Searle, John R. 1994. “Literary Theory and Its Discontents.” New Literary History 25 (3): 637–667. doi:10.2307/469470.
Searle, John R. 2012. Audio recording from unspecified lecture. YouTube (uploaded by user “theorrhea”). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvwhEIhv3N0&t=114s&ab_channel=theorrhea. Accessed January 3, 2023.
Sokal, Alan, and Jean Bricmont. 1999. Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science. New York: Picador.
Sword, Helen. 2012. “Zombie Nouns.” The New York Times, July 23, 2012. https://archive.nytimes.com/opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/23/zombie-nouns/.
Thomson, Judith J. 1985. “The Trolley Problem.” The Yale Law Journal 94: 1395–1415. http://www.psy.vanderbilt.edu/courses/hon182/thomsontrolley.pdf.
Wright, Colin. 2013. “Sadomasochism and the Body of Law: Lacan’s Reconceptualization of Perversion as Père-Version.” Theory & Event 16 (4): no pagination. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/530499.
Zillmann, Dolf. 1971. “Excitation Transfer in Communication-Mediated Aggressive Behavior.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 7 (4): 419–434. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(71)90075-8.
Zillmann, Dolf, Aaron H. Katcher, and Barry Milavsky. 1972. “Excitation Transfer from Physical Exercise to Subsequent Aggressive Behavior.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 8 (3): 247–259. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(72)80005-2.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Leviathan: Interdisciplinary Journal in English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
You are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format).
However:
You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
