Vidensnotat (3) om Universal Design for Learning
Et litteraturstudie om Universal Design for Learning på videregående uddannelser
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/arbejdspapirerkp.i14.157039Nøgleord:
litteraturstudie, Universal Design for Learning, læringsforudsætninger, læringsforløb, undervisningsdifferentiering, diversitet, videregående uddannelserResumé
Formålet med dette litteraturstudie er at bidrage til afdækning af den eksisterende, forskningsbaserede viden om Universal Design for Learning (UDL) som et didaktisk alternativ til undervisningsdifferentiering.
Teoretisk bygger UDL på idéen om Universal Design. Overført til uddannelsesområdet er det overordnede princip, at barrierer for deltagelse skal fjernes, så studerende med særlige behov ikke behøver bede om at få taget specifikke hensyn. Læringsforløb skal derimod designes, så alle studerende, uanset forudsætninger, har lige muligheder for at deltage.
I litteraturstudiet har vi undersøgt, hvilke muligheder og udfordringer der er for at håndtere forskellige læringsforudsætninger via UDL og præsenterer en række begreber og guidelines for, hvordan uddannelser kan tilrettelægges efter UDL-principper.
Referencer
Altowairiki, N. F. (2023). Universal Design for Learning Infusion in Online Higher Education. Online Learning Journal, 27(1), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3080.
Antczak, Falkenberg og Schaumann (2024). Vidensnotat (1) om differentiering – et litteraturstudie om undervisningsdifferentiering på videregående uddannelser. Københavns Professionshøjskole. Upubliceret.
Azam, S., Goodnough, K. C., Moghaddam, A., Arnold, C., Penney, S., Young, G. D., & Maich, K. (2021). Becoming Inclusive Teacher Educators: Self-Study as a Professional Learning Tool. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(2).
Balta, J. Y., Supple, B., & O’Keeffe, G. W. (2021). The Universal Design for Learning Framework in Anatomical Sciences Education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 14(1), 71–78.
Boothe, K. A., Lohmann, M. J., & Owiny, R. (2020). Enhancing Student Learning in the Online Instructional Environment through the Use of Universal Design for Learning. Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 22(1).
CAST (2018). The Universal Design for Learning Guidelines Graphic Organizer (with numbers)
Clinton V (2019) Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Reading 42(2): 288–325.
Danmarks Evalueringsinstitut (2023). Førsteårsstuderendes oplevelse af specialpædagogisk støtte. Danmarks Evalueringsinstitut.
Dinmore, S., & Stokes, J. (2015). Creating inclusive university curriculum: Implementing universal design for learning in an enabling program. Widening Participation & Lifelong Learning, 17(4), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.5456/WPLL.17.4.4
Espada-Chavarria, R., González-Montesino, R. H., López-Bastías, J. L., & Díaz-Vega, M. (2023). Universal Design for Learning and Instruction: Effective Strategies for Inclusive Higher Education. Education Sciences, 13(6). 'https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060620
Falkencrone, S. et al. (2022). Et uddannelseslandskab i forandring. Tænketanken DEA.
Fleming, E. C. (2023). UDL for Inclusive Teaching: Offering Choice to Increase Belonging through Technology. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 12, 72–90.
Frandsen, A. K., Bonfils, I. S., & Olsen, L. (red.) (2023). Universelt design: tværdisciplinære perspektiver i teori og praksis. Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
Garrad, T.-A., & Nolan, H. (2023). Rethinking Higher Education Unit Design: Embedding Universal Design for Learning in Online Studies. Student Success, 14(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.2300.
Griful-Freixenet, J., Struyven, K., Verstichele, M., & Andries, C. (2017). Higher education students with disabilities speaking out: Perceived barriers and opportunities of the Universal Design for Learning framework. Disability & Society, 32(10), 1627–1649. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1365695.
Halamish V, Elbaz E (2020) Children’s reading comprehension and metacomprehension on screen versus on paper. Computers & Education 145: 1–11.
Hansen, T. E. A: & Nørgaard, B. (2023). Kvalitative systematiske reviews – hvorfor og hvordan? Samfundslitteratur.
Hollingshead, A., Lowrey, K. A., & Howery, K. (2022). Universal Design for Learning: When Policy Changes Before Evidence. Educational Policy, 36(5), 1135–1161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904820951120.
Hromalik, C. D., Myhill, W. N., & Carr, N. R. (2020). “ALL Faculty Should Take this”: A Universal Design for Learning Training for Community College Faculty. TechTrends, 64(1), 91–104. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00439-6 .
Hromalik, C. D., Myhill, W. N., Ohrazda, C. A., Carr, N. R., & Zumbuhl, S. A. (2024).
Increasing Universal Design for Learning knowledge and application at a community college: The Universal Design for Learning Academy. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(3), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1931719.
Hutson, B., & Downs, H. (2015). The College STAR Faculty Learning Community: Promoting Learning for All Students through Faculty Collaboration. Journal of Faculty Development, 29(1), 25–32.
Kennette, L. N., & Wilson, N. A. (2019). Universal Design for Learning (UDL): Student and Faculty Perceptions. Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education, 2(1), 1–26.
Kirsch, B. A., Bryan, T., & Hoferer, D. (2024). Implementing Universal Design for Learning in the Higher Education Science Classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 53(2), 135–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/0047231X.2024.2316939 .
Leung, A., Moldovan, L., & Ata, M. (2023). Teaching economics in higher education with universal design for learning. International Review of Economics Education, 44, 100273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2023.100273.
Lind, U., Matthiesen, J., Navntoft, A. H. N., Johansen, S. V., Klestrup, R. S., Balasubramaniam, R., Lehmann, S. & Dohn, L. K. (2023). Studerendes læsning, læsestrateger og læseerfaringer. Københavns Professionshøjskole.
Murphy, M. P. A. (2021). Belief without evidence? A policy research note on Universal Design for Learning. Policy Futures in Education, 19(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210320940206.
Naik, N. (2017). Dual PowerPoint presentation approach for students with special educational needs and note-takers. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32(1), 146–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1254970.
Nieminen, J. H., & Pesonen, H. (2020). Taking universal design back to its roots: Perspectives on accessibility and identity in undergraduate mathematics. Education Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10010012.
Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D. and Soares, C. B. (2015) ‘Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews’, International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), pp. 141–46.
Pham, H. L. (2012). Differentiated Instruction and the Need to Integrate Teaching and Practice. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 9(1), 13–20.
Rao, K., Ok, M. W., & Bryant, B. R. (2014). A Review of Research on Universal Design Educational Models. Remedial and Special Education, 35(3), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513518980.
Reyes, C. T., Lawrie, G. A., Thompson, C. D., & Kyne, S. H. (2021). “Every little thing that could possibly be provided helps”: Analysis of online first-year chemistry resources using the universal design for learning framework. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 23(2), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1rp00171j .
Seymour, M. (2024). Enhancing the online student experience through the application of universal design for learning (udl) to research methods learning and teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 2767–2785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11948-6.
Sheridan, L., & Gigliotti, A. (2023). Designing online teaching curriculum to optimise learning for all students in higher education. Curriculum Journal, 34(4), 651–673. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.208 .
UNSDG (2022). Leave No One Behind. Unsdg | Leave No One Behind
Xie, J., & Rice, M. F. (2021). Professional and social investment in universal design for learning in higher education: Insights from a faculty development programme. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(7), 886–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1827372.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2025 Forfatter og Arbejdspapirer, Københavns Professionshøjskole
Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse –Ikke-kommerciel (by-nc).
Arbejdspapirer, Københavns Professionshøjskole kræver ikke afgivelse af copyright ved publicering. Dvs. at artikler efter publicering i Arbejdspapirer, kan udgives i andre sammenhænge, efter anmodning til redaktionen.
Det indsendte manus må ikke tidligere være blevet publiceret, og det må heller ikke være sendt parallelt til et andet tidsskrift med henblik på at komme i betragtning til at blive publiceret.
For artikler publiceret i Arbejdspapirer, Københavns Professionshøjskole tillades, at læsere kan downloade, kopiere, distribuere, udskrive, søge eller linke til og citere fra til ethvert lovligt formål. Arbejdspapirer, Københavns Professionshøjskole tillader ikke, at læsere bruger artikler eller dele af dem i egne artikler uden at citere, eller på anden vis anvender dem til kommercielle formål (CC BY-NC).
Arbejdspapirer, Københavns Professionshøjskole tillader, at forfatteren kan arkivere publiceret artikel (post-print) på egen institutions forskningsarkiv (Institutional Repository), når forfatteren samtidig linker til artiklen.
