To senmiddelalderlige relieffer og deres grafiske forelegg
Stilkritiske refleksjoner omkring Mariafremstillingene i Eksingedalskapet og Rollagtavlen – eller: En mulig virus i operativsystemet
Abstract
Two Late Medieval Enthroned Madonnas and Their Engraved Model.
Methodological Reflections on Dating and Attribution Based on Analysis of Style – or: a Possible Virus in the Operative System
By Henrik von Achen
Since the dawn of art history as a discipline, the method of analysing stylistic features of a work of art in order to discern when it was made, where and if possible by whom, has been fundamental in the work of arthistorians. In its essence the method is comparative, basing its analysis on the phenomenon of «visual likeness» between works of art. While one may object to such a method that its too subjective, too easily the victim of the art historian’s need to discover, attribute or date, it cannot be denied that the method is still fundamentally necessary in view of the vast amount of anonymous medieval works of art. The ‘modus operandi’ of this comparative method is based on the assumption that if works of art look alike, this indicates that they are somehow genetically linked. Discussing a late medieval enthroned Virgin and Child appearing in two different variations in southern Norway, Eksingedalen and Rollag, this paper points to a problem caused by the workshops’ use of mechanically reproduced models, engravings or woodcuts, since the beginning of the 15th century. These two sculptures, probably produced in northern Germany in the decades around 1500, are based on an engraving from c. 1465 by the «Master ES». This use of an older model made in quite a different area, will necessarily cause a sort of «genetic leap», where stylistic features appear with no logic connection to the workshop. If one bases an attribution solely on visual similarity, the fact that such models where often used constitutes a pitfall, where the «genetic leap» connects age, master and area in an arbitrary way, appearing to belong to the characteristics of a workshop or a woodcarver, but actually destroying any connection between visual similarity and genetics. However, as the method of style analysis is still a necessary tool, art historians should not dismiss its legitimate role in contemporary scholarship, but try to refine it to make it more aware of the historical facts of medieval art production, as well as of the visual conventions of an age. The method may be refined simply by gaining more knowledge of the many various reasons why two works of art to some extent came to look like each other. The competence to analyse style and form, the knowledge of the field in question, the shear ‘connaisseurship’, is thus not to bedismissed as outdated, but to be developed and refined, not least concerning its socio- economic aspects.
References
–: Hanseatische Kunst in Bergen während des Spätmittelalters: Import oder lokale Produktion?, Bergen und die deutsche Hanse, (red. I. Øye) Bergen 1996, s. 59-85.
Albrecht, Uwe et al.: Der Bordesholmer Altar des Hans Brüggemann. Werk und Wirkung. Berlin 1996.
Appuhn, Horst: Meister E.S. Alle 320 Kupferstiche. Dortmund 1989.
Baxandall, Michael: The Limewood Sculptors of Renaissance Germany. New Haven, 1980.
Bendixen, B. E: Aus der mittelalterlichen Sammlung des Museums in Bergen. Bergens Museums årbok 1911.
–: Kirkerne i Søndre Bergenhus Amt. Samlet utgave, Bergen 1913.
Bonsdorff, Jan v.: Kunstproduktion und Kunstverbreitung im Ostseeraum des Spätmittelalters. Helsinki 1993.
Christie, Sigrid & Håkon: Østfold bd. 2. Norges Kirker, utg. Riksantikvaren, Oslo 1959.
–: Akershus bd. 2. Norges Kirker, utg. Riksantikvaren, Oslo 1969.
–: Buskerud bd. 1. Norges kirker, utg. Riksantikvaren, Oslo 1981.
Engelstad, Eivind S.: Senmiddelalderens kunst i Norge. Oslo 1936.
Fett, Harry: Norges kirker i middelalderen. Kristiania 1909.
–: Middelalderens skulptur og maleri. Norges Kunsthistorie, bd. 1, Oslo 1925.
Gegen den Strom. Meisterwerke niederrheinischer Skulptur in Zeiten der Reformation 1500-1550. Utstillingskatalog fra Suermondt-Ludwig Museum i Aachen, Berlin 1996.
Gombrich, Ernst H: Kunsthistorie og samfundsvidenskab. København 1978.
Grimme, Ernst Günther: Deutsche Madonnen. Köln 1976.
Hasse, Max: Lübecks Kunst im Mittelalter. Kirchliche Kunst des Mittelalters und der Reformationszeit, Katalog St. Annen-museum, Lübeck 1981.
Hessig, Edith: Die Kunst des Meisters E.S. und die Plastik der Spätgotik. Berlin 1935.
Kitzlinger, Christine: Die künstlerische Umsetzung graphischer Vorlagen im Passionszyklus des Bordesholmer Retabels, Der Bordesholmer Altar, 1996, s. 109-135.
Krone-Balcke, Ulrike: Der Kefermarkter Altar. Sein Meister und seine Werkstatt. München 1999.
Moltke, Erik: Bernt Notkes altertavle i Århus domkirke og Tallinntavlen I-II. København 1970.
Nicolaysen, Nicolay: Norske Fornlevninger. Fortidsminnesmerkeforeningen, Kristiania 1862-66.
Nordhagen, Per Jonas: Senmiddelalderens billedkunst 1350-1537. Norges kunsthistorie bd. 2, Oslo 1981.
Reuterswärd, Patrik: Nederländska altarflyglar: Lofta och Västra Ingelstad. Den ljusa medeltiden, utg. Statens Historiska Museum, Studies 4, Stockholm 1984.
Sachs, Hannelore: Der Flügelaltar von St. Marien zu Bernau. Berlin 1989.
Scheller, Robert W: Model-Book Drawings and the Practice of Artistic Transmission in the Middle Ages. Amsterdam 1995.
Schrumpf, Anne Fredrikke: Senmiddelalderens treskulptur i Norge. Eivind Engelstads verk fra 1936, i et nytt lys. Upubl. hovedoppgave ved IKK, Universitetet i Bergen 1999.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Forfatter og Forlag.