Assemmethodology?
A Commentary
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v6i1.137001Abstract
NA
References
Arminen, I., Licoppe, C., & Spagnolli, A. (2016). Respecifying Mediated Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(4), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1234614
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning (Second Printing edition). Duke University Press Books.
Bateson, G. (1967). A theory of play and fantasy: A report on theoretical aspects of The project for study of the role of the paradoxes of abstraction in communication. Bobbs-Merrill.
Buber, M. (2012). I and Thou. eBookIt.com.
Button, G., Lynch, M., & Sharrock, W. (2022). Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis and Constructive Analysis: On Formal Structures of Practical Action. Taylor & Francis.
Caronia, L. (2018). Following and Analyzing an Artifact: Culture-through-Things. In F. Cooren & F. Malbois (Eds.), Methodological and Ontological Principles of Observation and Analysis. Routledge.
Cekaite, A., & Goodwin, M. (2021). Touch and Social Interaction. Annual Review of Anthropology, 50. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110402
Cooren, F. (2020). Beyond Entanglement: (Socio-) Materiality and Organization Studies. Organization Theory, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720954444
Crabtree, A. (2004). Taking technomethodology seriously: Hybrid change in the ethnomethodology–design relationship. European Journal of Information Systems, 13(3), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000500
Dant, T. (2004). The Driver-car. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(4–5), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276404046061
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Continuum.
Dourish, P., & Button, G. (1998). On ‘Technomethodology’: Foundational Relationships Between Ethnomethodology and System Design. Human–Computer Interaction, 13(4), 395.
Due, B. L. (2021a). Distributed Perception: Co-Operation between Sense-Able, Actionable, and Accountable Semiotic Agents. Symbolic Interaction, 44(1), 134–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.538
Due, B. L. (2021b). RoboDoc: Semiotic resources for achieving face-to-screenface formation with a telepresence robot. Semiotica, 238, 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0148
Due, B. L. (2021c). Interspecies intercorporeality and mediated haptic sociality: Distributing perception with a guide dog. Visual Studies, 0(0), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2021.1951620
Due, B. L. (2023). Guide dog versus robot dog: Assembling visually impaired people with non-human agents and achieving assisted mobility through distributed co-constructed perception. Mobilities, 18(1), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2022.2086059
Eisenmann, C., & Lynch, M. (2021). Introduction to Harold Garfinkel’s Ethnomethodological ‘Misreading’ of Aron Gurwitsch on the Phenomenal Field. Human Studies, 44(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-020-09564-1
Enfield, N. J., & Kockelman, P. (2017). Distributed Agency. Oxford University Press.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall.
Garfinkel, H. (1988). Evidence for Locally Produced, Naturally Accountable Phenomena of Order, Logic, Reason, Meaning, Method, etc. In and as of the Essential Quiddity of Immortal Ordinary Society, (I of IV): An Announcement of Studies. Sociological Theory, 6(1), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.2307/201918
Garfinkel, H. (1991). Respecification: Evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order, logic, reason, meaning, methods, etc. In and of the essential haecceity of immortal ordinary society (I)—An announcement of studies. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences (pp. 10–19). Cambridge University Press.
Garfinkel, H. (1996). Ethnomethodology’s Program. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(1), 5–21.
Garfinkel, H., & Livingston, E. (2003). Phenomenal field properties of order in formatted queues and their neglected standing in the current situation of inquiry. Visual Studies, 18(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/147258603200010029
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing. Towards an Ecological Psychology. (pp. 127–143). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Goffman, E. (1964). The Neglected Situation. American Anthropologist, 66(6), 133–136.
Goodwin, C. (1993). The Blackness of Black. Color Categories as Situated Practice. In L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, Tools and Reasoning: Essays on Situated Cognition. (pp. 111–140). Springer.
Goodwin, C. (1995). Seeing in Depth. Social Studies of Science, 25(2), 237–274.
Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, Stance and Affect in the Organization of Activities. Discourse and Society, 18(1), 53–74.
Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
Have, P. T. (2002). The Notion of Member is the Heart of the Matter: On the Role of Membership Knowledge in Ethnomethodological Inquiry. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(3). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/834
Hawley, S. (2021). Doing sociomaterial studies: The circuit of agency. Learning, Media and Technology, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.1986064
Heidegger, M. (2010). Being and Time. SUNY Press.
Helin, J., Hernes, T., Hjort, D., & Holt, R. (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Process Philosophy and Organization Studies. In The Oxford Handbook of Process Philosophy and Organization Studies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199669356.001.0001
Hutchby, I. (2014). Communicative affordances and participation frameworks in mediated interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 72, 86–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.08.012
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. CogNet.
Ibnelkaïd, S., & Avgustis, I. (2023). Situated agency in digitally artifacted social interactions. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality.
Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. Psychology Press.
Ingold, T. (2012). Toward an Ecology of Materials*. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145920
Ivarsson, J., & Greiffenhagen, C. (2015). The Organization of Turn-Taking in Pool Skate Sessions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(4), 406–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1090114
Keevallik, L. (2013). Here in time and space: Decomposing movement in dance instruction. In P. Haddington, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion (pp. 345–371). De Gruyter.
Kendon, A. (1976). The F-Formation System: The Spatial Organization of Social Encounters. Man-Environment Systems, 6, 291–296.
Kvart, S. L., & Bowden, H. M. (2022). Instructing Equestrian Feel: On the Art of Teaching Embodied Knowledge. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(2), 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1869076
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.
Laurier, E., Muñoz, D., Miller, R., & Brown, B. (2020). A Bip, a Beeeep, and a Beep Beep: How Horns Are Sounded in Chennai Traffic. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(3), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1785775
Law, J. (2004). After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Psychology Press.
Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Information and Organization, 23(2), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.002
Llewellyn, N. (2014). Harold Garfinkel (1917–2011). In J. Helin, T. Hernes, & R. Holt (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Process Philosophy and Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199669356.013.0029
Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge University Press.
Lynch, M. (2017). STS, symmetry and post-truth. Social Studies of Science, 47(4), 593–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717720308
Malafouris, L. (2019). Mind and material engagement. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 18(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9606-7
Maynard, D. W. (2006). Cognition on the ground. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059560
Meyer, C., Streeck, J., & Jordan, J. S. (2017). Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction. Oxford University Press.
Mondada, L. (Ed.). (2021). Sensing in Social Interaction. In Sensing in Social Interaction: The Taste for Cheese in Gourmet Shops (pp. i–ii). Cambridge University Press.
Mondada, L. (2022). Appealing to the senses: Approaching, sensing, and interacting at the market’s stall. Discourse & Communication, 16(2), 160–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211043597
Mondada, L., & Meguerditchian, A. (2022). Sequence organization and embodied mutual orientations: Openings of social interactions between baboons. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 377(1859), 20210101. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0101
Mondémé, C. (2020). La socialité interspécifique: Une analyse multimodale des interactions homme-chien. Lambert-Lucas.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138
Pelikan, H., Broth, M., & Keevallik, L. (2022). When a Robot Comes to Life: The Interactional Achievement of Agency as a Transient Phenomenon. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v5i3.129915
Sacks, H. L., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
Suchman, L. (2007). Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press.
Whitehead, A. N. (1979). Process and Reality (D. R. Griffin & D. W. Sherburne, Eds.; 2nd Revised edition edition). Macmillan USA.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
We follow the Budapest Open Access Initiative's definition of Open Access.
The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
The journal allows software/spiders to automatically crawl the journal content (also known as text mining)
The journal provides article level metadata to DOAJ
The journal allows readers to read, download, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose.
