Drones and the Threshold for Waging War
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/politik.v20i1.27642Abstract
If drones make waging war easier, the reason why they do so may not be the one commonly assumed within the philosophical debate – namely, the promised reduction in casualties on either side – but a more complicated one. One that has little to do with the concern for one’s own soldiers or, for that matter, the enemy, but rather one that is embedded in the political intricacies of international relations and domestic politics. This article will utilize the example of the Obama Administration’s drone policies to illustrate this argument. This analysis is also meant to have a wider methodological significance; that philosophy can make an important contribution in analyzing drone warfare. However, philosophy will not help to simplify realities and provide easy solutions.
References
Brunstetter, D & Braun, M 2011, ‘The Implications of Drones on the Just War Tradition’, Ethics & International Affairs, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 337-358.
Byman, D 2013, ‘Why Drones Work’. Foreign Affairs, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 32-43.
Coeckelbergh, M 2013, ‘Drones, Information Technology, and Distance: Mapping the Moral Epistemology of Remote Fighting’, Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 87-98.
Cronin, A K 2013, ‘Why Drones Fail’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 44-54.
Di Nucci, E 2014a, ‘I droni tra progresso ed etica’, AREL La Rivista, vol. L, pp. 108-115.
Di Nucci, E 2014b, Ethics Without Intention, London, Bloomsbury.
Di Nucci, E (forthcoming), ‘Sexual Rights, Disability and Sex Robots’, in J Danaher & N McArthur (eds.), Philosophy and Ethics of Sex Robots, MIT Press.
Di Nucci, E & Santoni de Sio, F 2014, ‘Who’s Afraid of Robots? Fear of Automation and the Ideal of Direct Control’, in F Battaglia & N Weidenfeld (red.), Roboethics in Film, Pisa University Press.
Di Nucci, E & Santoni de Sio, F 2016, Drones and Responsibility, New York and London, Routledge.
Enemark, C 2013, Armed Drones and the Ethics of War: Military Virtue in a Post-Heroic Age, Routledge.
Enemark, C 2011, ‘Drones over Pakistan: Secrecy, Ethics, and Counterinsurgency’, Asian Security, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 218-237.
Fabre, C 2009, ‘Guns, Food, and Liability to Attack in War’, Ethics, vol. 120, pp. 36-63.
Floridi, L 2014, The Fourth Revolution. How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Franke, U E 2014, ‘Drones, Drone Strikes, and US Policy: The Politics of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Parameters, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 121-131.
Gregory, D 2011, ‘From a View to a Kill. Drones and Late Modern War, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 28, no. 7-8, pp. 188-215.
Kirkpatrick, J 2016, ‘State Responsibility and Drone Operators’, in E Di Nucci & F Santoni de Sio (red.), Drones and Responsibility, New York and London, Routledge.
Liu, H Y 2015, Law’s Impunity, Hart.
Paust, J J 2010, ‘Self-defense Targetings of Non-State Actors and Permissibility of US use of Drones in Pakistan’, Journal of Transnational Law & Policy, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 237.
Santoni de Sio, F & Di Nucci, E 2016, ’Drones and Responsibility: Mapping the Field’, in E Di Nucci & F Santoni de Sio (eds.), Drones and Responsibility, New York and London, Routledge.
Singer, P W 2009, Wired for War, New York, Penguin Books.
Strawser, B J 2010, ‘Moral predators: The Duty to Employ Uninhabited Aerial Vehicles’, Journal of Military Ethics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 342-368.
Strawser, B J (red.) 2013, Killing by Remote Control: The Ethics of an Unmanned Military, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Wall, T, & Monahan, T 2011, ‘Surveillance and Violence from afar: The Politics of Drones and Liminal Security-Scapes’, Theoretical Criminology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 239-254.
Williams, B G 2013, Predators: The CIA’s Drone War on al Qaeda, Potomac Books.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Forfattere, der publicerer deres værker via dette tidsskrift, accepterer følgende vilkår:
- Forfattere bevarer deres ophavsret og giver tidsskriftet ret til første publicering, samtidigt med at værket er omfattet af en Creative Commons Attribution-licens, der giver andre ret til at dele værket med en anerkendelse af værkets forfatter og første publicering i nærværende tidsskrift.
- Forfattere kan indgå flere separate kontraktlige aftaler om ikke-eksklusiv distribution af tidsskriftets publicerede version af værket (f.eks. sende det til et institutionslager eller udgive det i en bog), med en anerkendelse af værkets første publicering i nærværende tidsskrift.
- Forfattere har ret til og opfordres til at publicere deres værker online (f.eks. i institutionslagre eller på deres websted) forud for og under manuskriptprocessen, da dette kan føre til produktive udvekslinger, samt tidligere og større citater fra publicerede værker (se The Effect of Open Access).