Neoliberalism and the Challenges of Social Justice

Covid 19 and Migrant Labour Crisis in India


  • Zeba


Neoliberalism, Migrant Labour, informal workers, Post liberalisation


Neoliberalism, governed by the organising principle of the market and its role in influencing society’s socio-economic and political spheres, has raised contradictions in the state’s capacity to ensure social justice for the vulnerable sections of the political society. This article seeks to analyse the role of the state, as envisaged in the neoliberal framework, in delivering on promises of welfare and social security for marginalised people and, specifically, for informal migrant labourers in India. It documents a strong nexus of neoliberalism and state institutions that undermines the state’s willingness to take the kinds of policy interventions that could mitigate many socio-economic elements of the informal labour market as manifested in the informalisation of labour, privatisation, precarious work conditions, and inadequate social security. The Covid–19 crisis in India exposed the sharp inequalities in India’s democracy. The article assesses the Indian state’s attempts to address the socio-economic reality of migrant labourers. Through this theoretical and empirical exploration, the article delves into questions of how the idea of ‘social justice’ and the role of the state have been reconceptualised and reframed in the neoliberal world order. Finally, the article argues that it might be impossible to reclaim social justice for the vulnerable within a neoliberal framework: we might require a paradigm shift in terms of constituting and re-imagining new political rationalities, embodied in a political discourse of rights and dignity of labour, as a prelude to redefining the principles of social justice from the vantage point of the vulnerable groups.




How to Cite

Zeba. (2022). Neoliberalism and the Challenges of Social Justice: Covid 19 and Migrant Labour Crisis in India. NAVEIÑ REET: Nordic Journal of Law and Social Research, (12), 171–192. Retrieved from