Justice for Muslim Women in India: the sinuous path of the All India Muslim Women Personal Law Board1
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/nnjlsr.v0i3.111107Abstract
Muslim Women movements in India have been very active in the past decade, attracting attention both in the Sub-Continent and beyond. This article vows to present a particular trend of this activism centred on the legal sphere, moreover within the frame of the Muslim personal law system and its non-State adjudicative bodies. Through the All India Muslim Women Personal Law Board (AIMWPLB), it will present the example of an attempt to challenge the ‘patriarchal’ legal discourse on Islamic Law by procuring an alternative dispute resolution forum specifically aimed at Muslim women’s issues, as well as advocating for a more gender equal interpretation of the Quran through the prism of ‘Islamic Feminism’. However, it will show that despite its President’s tremendous efforts, the AIMWPLB’s scope remains limited. Although establishing a somewhat successful mediation centre in the Lucknow area, it has for the moment failed to extend its reach in the rest of the Indian Territory. Likewise, its particular discourse on Islamic Law has had but little influence on its overall application in India, and paradoxically could even be counter-productive towards its progression towards a gender equalitarian interpretation.
References
The Indian evidence act. 1872. Sections 45, 112
The Muslim personal law (shariat) application act. 1937.
The Constitution of India. 1950. Articles 17, 26, 44
Hindu succession act. 1956.
The code of criminal procedure. 1973. Section 125
The Muslim women (protection of rights on divorce) act. 1986
The wakf act. 1995. Hindu succession (amendment) act. 2005.
Cases (India)
Mohd. Ahmed khan v. Shah bano begum and ors. 1985. In All India Reporter, SC:945:
Supreme Court.
Anil kumar v. Turaka kondala rao and another. 1998. In Andhra Law Decisions, 5:44:
Andhra High Court.
Danial latifi v. Union of india. 2001. In Supreme Court Cases, 7:740: Supreme Court.
Dagdu s/o chotu pathan, latur v rahimbi dagdu pathan, ashabi... 2002. In Bombay Cases Reporter, 2003 (1):740: Bombay High Court.
S. Thangavelu v. S. Kannammal. 2004. In All India Reporter, 2005:106: Madras High Court.
Vishwa lochan madan vs. Union of india. 2005. Writ petition (civil) 386/2005 Supreme Court (still pending).
Mst. Gulshan v. Sh. Raisuddin. 2011. un-reported: Delhi District Court.
References
Ahmad, Irfan. (2008) Cracks in the ‘mightiest fortress’: Jamaat-e-islami’s changing discourses on women. Modern Asian Studies 42, no. 2-3: 549-575.
All India Muslim Personal Law Board. 2001. A compendium of islamic laws. New Delhi: AIMPLB.
All India Muslim Women Personal Law Board. http://muslimwomenpersonallaw.com/ (accessed 10th May 2012, 2012).
All India Muslim Women Personal Law Board. Nikah nama. http://muslimwomenpersonallaw.com/pdf/nikahanama.pdf (accessed 10th May 2012,
2012).
Ambar, Shaista. An appeal to add the rights of a muslim woman in the constitution of india. http://shaistaambar.blogspot.com/2011/04/appeal-to-add-legal-rights-ofmuslim.
html (accessed 10th May 2012, 2012).Ambar, Shaista. The official blog of Shaista Amber. 2012. Online.
Christians, Louis-Léon. 2012. La charia désétatisée: Usage collectif et conscience individuelle en belgique (et en france). In La charia aujourd'hui. Usages de la
référence au droit islamique., ed. Baudouin Dupret:227-241. Paris: La Découverte.
Dhanda, Amita and Archana Parashar. 2008. Introduction. In Redefining family law in india, ed. Amita Dhanda and Archana Parashar:ix-xxix. New Delhi: Routledge.
Dupret, Baudouin. 1999. L'historicité de la norme. Du positivisme de l'islamologue juridique à l'anthropologie de la norme islamique. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales
54, no. 1: 169-196.
Dupret, Baudouin and Léon Buskens. 2012. Introduction. In La charia aujourd'hui.
Usages de la référence au droit islamique., ed. Baudouin Dupret:9-17. Paris: La Découverte.
Garapon, Antoine. 1997. Bien juger: Essai sur le rituel judiciaire. Paris: Odile Jacob.
Hart, Herbert L. A. 1993. The concept of law. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Original edition, 1961.
Jones, Justin. 2010. 'signs of churning': Muslim personal law and public contestation in twenty-first century india. Modern Asian Studies 44, no. 1: 175-200.
Legendre, Pierre. 1996-1997. Anthropologie dogmatique, définition d’un concept.
Annuaire de l’EPHE, Section des sciences religieuses, résumé des conférences et travaux 105: 23-43.
________. 1999. Sur la question dogmatique en occident. Paris: Fayard.
Menski, Werner. 2008. The uniform civil code debate in indian law: New developments and changing agenda. German Law Journal 9, no. 3: 211-250.
Mir-Hosseini, Ziba. 2006. Muslim women’s quest for equality: Between law and feminism. Critical Inquiry, no. 32: 629-645.
Ministry of Minority Affairs. 2007. The report of the national commission for religious and linguistic minorities, by Misra, Ranganath.
Mukerjee, Sutapa. India's muslisms face up to rifts. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4235999.stm (accessed 3rd May 2012, 2012).
Nader, Laura and Elisabetta Grande. 2002. Current Illusions and Delusions about Conflict Management in Africa and Elsewhere. Law and Social Inquiry 27, no. 3: 573-
591.
Pal, Ruma. 2001. Religious minorities and the law. In Religion and personal law in secular india: A call to judgment, ed. Gerald J. Larson: 24-35. Indianapolis: Indiana
University Press.
Pickthal, Mohammed Marmaduke. 1989. The meaning of the glorious koran : An explanatory translation. Delhi: Taj.
Protest against india rape fatwa. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4640905.stm (accessed 3rd May 2012, 2012).
Redding, Jeff A. 2010. International v. Liberal contexts for contemporary non-state, muslim civil dispute resolution systems. Journal of Islamic State Practices in
International Law 6, no. 1: 2-26.
Robinson, Francis. 2001. The 'ulama of farangi mahall and islamic culture in south asia. London: C. Hurst.
Ross, Alf. 1957. Tû-tû. Harvard Law Review 70, no. 5: 812-825.
Roy, Nilangana S. Muslim women in india seek gender equality in marriage. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/25/world/asia/25iht-letter25.html?pagewanted=all
(accessed 3rd May 2012, 2012).
Schneider, Nadja-Christina. 2009. Islamic feminism and muslim's women's rights activism in india: From transnational discourse to local movement - or vice versa? .
Journal of International Women's studies 11, no. 1: 56-71.
Srivastava, Piyush. 2012. Darul uloom at deoband issues fatwa against polygamy. India Today. http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/darul-uloom-at-deoband-issues-fatwa-againstpolygamy/1/184287.html.
The official blog of shaista amber. http://shaistaambar.blogspot.com/ (accessed 10th May 2012, 2012).
Vatuk, Sylvia. 2001. "Where will she go? What will she do?" Paternalism toward women in the administration of muslim personal law in contemporary india. In
Religion and personal law in secular india: A call to judgment, ed. Gerald J. Larson:226-250. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
________. 2008. Islamic feminism in india: Indian muslim women activists and the reform of muslim personal law. Modern Asian Studies 42, no. 2-3: 489-518.
________. 2009. A rallying cry for Muslim personal law: The Shah Bano case and its aftermath. In Islam in south asia in practice, ed. Barbara D. Metcalf:352-361. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Counting from number 12 (2022), articles published in NNJLSR are licensed under Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Readers are allowed to copy and redistribute the articles in any medium or format, to adapt and revise the articles, and use the articles for commercial purposes, provided that the readers give appropriate credits.
No Creative Commons licenses are applied on articles in number 1 (2009)-11 (2021). All rights reserved by the authors. Readers are allowed to download, read, and link to the articles published in volume 1 (2009)-11 (2021), but they may not republish or redistribute these articles without permission of the authors.
