Marxist Aesthetics
A Historical Antinomy
Keywords:
Marxism, Aesthetics, Lenin, V.I, Pisarev, D., Modern ArtAbstract
This essay discusses the current status and meaning of Marxist aesthetics. As a somewhat heavy-handed gesture, some might say breast-beating, it attempts to link Marxist aesthetics to the question of revolutionary politics. To achieve this, it examines the relationship between revolutionary strategy and imagination in a previous era discussing a short paragraph in Lenin’s What is to be Done?, in which Lenin refers to Dmitry Pisarev. By comparing Lenin and Pisarev, the essay highlights two contrasting approaches within revolutionary Marxism, characterised by two divergent conceptions of art. Nevertheless, both sought to relate art to revolutionary politics. The essay ends by asking whether this is possible today, and, if not what this means for the project of Marxist aesthetics – does it even exist?
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
