Klasseledelse i matematik. Hvad ved vi egentlig?
PDF

Nøgleord

Matematiklærer
Læring
Grundskole
Mellemtrinnet
Indskolning

Citation/Eksport

Schmidt, M.-C. S. (2013). Klasseledelse i matematik. Hvad ved vi egentlig?. MONA - Matematik- Og Naturfagsdidaktik, (3), 21. https://doi.org/10.7146/mona.v0i3.36048

Resumé

Hvilken forskningsbaseret viden kan identificeres om sammenhængen mellem matematiklæreresklasseledelse og elevers deltagelse i læringsfællesskabet? Reviewet stiller skarpt på hvordanlærere praktiserer klasseledelse i den almindelige matematikundervisning, og på hvilke betydningerforskellige praksisformer kan få for elever i matematikvanskeligheder. Det beskrives hvordan lærerensadfærds-, relations- og læringsledelse bidrager til forskellige elevers muligheder for inklusion i fagetmatematik. Der er fundet ti studier af den almene matematikundervisning der peger på forskelligeundervisningsstrategier over for elever i læringsvanskeligheder på begynder- og mellemtrin. Studiernebeskrives her, og der uddrages konklusioner på tværs af studierne.What research-based knowledge can be identified in relation to the connection between mathematicsteachers’ classroom leadership and students’ participation in the learning community? The presentreview focuses on how teachers are practicing classroom leadership in the general mathematicseducation and how these forms of practice can be of importance for students in learning difficulties.It is described how the teacher’s behavioral, relational, and learning leadership can support differentstudents’ opportunities for inclusion in mathematics. Ten studies of general mathematics educationhave been found that point to teaching strategies towards students in learning difficulties at beginnerand intermediate stage. These studies are described here, and conclusions across studies are extracted.
https://doi.org/10.7146/mona.v0i3.36048
PDF

Referencer

Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Joh nson, D., Wiliam, D., King’s College, L. S. o. E. et al. (1997). Effective Teachers of Numeracy: Final Report: Report of a Study Carried Out for the Teacher Training Agency 1995‑96 by the School of Education. London: King’s College.

Baker, S., Gersten, R. & Lee, D. (2002). A Synthesis of Empirical Research on Teaching Mathematics to Low-Achieving Students. The Elementary School Journal, 103(1), s. 51.

Black, L. (2004). Differential Participation in Whole-Class Discussions and the Construction of Marginalised Identities. The Journal of Educational Enquiry – LA English, 5(1).

Brunton, G. e. a. (2012). Finding Relevant Studies. I: D. Gough (red.), An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Carrington, S. (1999). Inclusion Needs a Different School Culture. International Journal of Inclusive Education, s. 257‑268.

Clark, C., Dyson, A. & Millward, A. (1998). Theorising Special Education: Time to Move On? I: C. Clark, A. Dyson & A. Millward (red.), Theorising Special Education (s. 157‑173). London: Routledge.

Dansk Clearinghouse for Uddannelsesforskning. (2006). Konceptnotat. Lokaliseret 24. oktober 2012 på: www.dpu.dk/fileadmin/www.dpu.dk/omdpu/danskclearinghouseforuddannelsesforskning/konceptnotat/20070112145703_dansk-clearinghouse-for-uddannelsesforskning_konceptnotat_version-1_december06.pdf.

Doyle, W. (1985). Recent Research on Classroom Management: Implications for Teacher Preparation. Journal of Teacher Education – LA English, 36(3), s. 31.

Dyssegaard, C.B., Larsen, M.S. & Tiftikci, N. (2012). Effekt og pædagogisk indsats ved inklusion af børn med særlige behov i grundskolen. Forskningskortlægning. København: Dansk Clearinghouse for Uddannelsesforskning, Aarhus Universitet.

Engström, A. (2000). Specialpedagogik för 2000-talet. Nämaran, 1/2000.

Ernest, P. (2011). Mathematics and Special Educational Needs: Theories of Mathematical Ability and Effective Types of Intervention with Low and High Attainers in Mathematics. Saarbrücken: LAP, Lambert Academic Publishing.

Evertson, C.M. & Weinstein, C.S. (2006). Classroom Management as a Field of Inquiry. I: C.M. Evertson & C.S. Weinstein (red.), Handbook of Classroom Management: Research, Practice, and Contemporary Issues. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hastrup, K., Rubow, C. & Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, T. (2011). Kulturanalyse: Kort fortalt. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.

Herløv, H.L. (2012). Inklusionens økonomi er en spareøvelse. Dansk pædagogisk tidsskrift, 2012(4), s. 36‑47.

Higgins, K., Cermak-Rudolf, C. & Blanke, B. (2009). “Yeah, but what if…?”: A Study of Mathematical Discourse in a Third-Grade Classroom. I: L. Knott (red.), The Role of Mathematics Discourse in Producing Leaders of Discourse. A Volume In: The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast Monograph Series in Mathematics Education (s. 61‑76). Charlotte, N.C.: IAP, Information Age Publishing.

Issitt, J., Kyriacou, C. & EPPI-Centre. (2008). What Characterises Effective Teacher-Initiated Teacher- Pupil Dialogue to Promote Conceptual Understanding in Mathematics Lessons in England in Key Stages 2 and 3: A Systematic Review. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.

Kunsch, C.A. et al. (2007). The Effects of Peer-Mediated Instruction in Mathematics for Students with Learning Problems: A Research Synthesis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), s. 1‑12.

Kvale, S. (1997). Interview: En introduktion til det kvalitative forskningsinterview. Kbh.: Hans Reitzel.

McLeskey, J., Waldron, N.L. & Redd, L. (2012). A Case Study of a Highly Effective, Inclusive Elementary School. Lokaliseret 15. juni 2012 på: http://education.ufl.edu/disability-policy-practice/files/2012/05/McLeskey-Waldron-Redd-JSED-Case-Study-3.pdf.

Oliver, R. e. a. (2011). Teacher Classroom Management Practices: Effects on Disruptive or Agressive Student Behavior. Campbell Collaboration.

Patrick, H., Turner, J.C., Meyer, D.K. & Midgley, C. (2003). How Teachers Establish Psychological Environments During the first Days of School: Associations with Avoidance in Mathematics. Teachers College Record, 105(8), s. 1521‑1558.

Petticrew, M. & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.

Skidmore, D. (2004). Inclusion – The Dynamic of School Development. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Slavin, R.E. & Lake, C. (2008). Effective Programs in Elementary Mathematics: A Best-Evidence Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), s. 427.

Streitlien, Å. (2010). Pupils’ Participation in the Classroom Discourse of Mathematics. I: B. Sriraman, C. Bergsten, S. Goodchild, G. Pálsdótti, B.D. Søndergaard & L. Haapasalo (red.), The First Sourcebook on Nordic Research in Mathematics Education: Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Denmark, and Contributions from Finland. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast. Monograph Series in Mathematics Education; Monograph 10 (s. 211‑222). Charlotte: Information Age.

Undervisningsministeriet. (1997). Salamanca erklæringen og handlingsprogrammet for specialundervisning. Verdenskonference om specialundervisning – adgang og kvalitet. Salamanca, Spanien, 7.-10. juni 1994. Kbh.: Undervisningsministeriet, Folkeskoleafdelingen.

Undervisningsministeriet. (2012) Lov om ændring af lov om folkeskolen, lov om friskoler og private grundskoler m.v. og lov om folkehøjskoler, efterskoler, husholdningsskoler og håndarbejdsskoler (frie kostskoler).

Creative Commons License

Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse –Ikke-kommerciel (by-nc).

Copyright (c) 2016 MONA - Matematik- og Naturfagsdidaktik