Skrift vs. tale på internettet: Et argument for en interaktionelt fokuseret tilgang til skriftlige samtaler på Facebook
Keywords:
samtaleanalyse, computermedieret kommunikation, samtalegrammatik, interaktionAbstract
This article is centered around the discussion on the relationship between spoken and writtenlanguage in online written discourse, which it investigates from the perspective of interactional
grammar (“samtalegrammatik”). The purpose of the article is to highlight certain shortcomings in
the discussion as it has played out so far and to argue for a different approach to it, inspired by
conversation analysis.
After an introduction to the discussion, a CA-inspired analysis of a phenomenon of oral
interactional grammar, namely questions in the declarative used in threads in two Facebook
groups, is presented. It is concluded that using the method is possible and that the phenomenon
investigated works in the same way on Facebook as it does in oral interaction. The article discusses
what perspectives these findings give on the discussion on the relationship between speech and
writing in online written discourse.
Finally, it is recommended that more investigations of this sort are conducted, among other things
to refine the method and to further investigate what insights it can provide on the relationship
between spoken and written language online.
References
Biber, D. & S. Conrad. 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Brøcker, K. K., M. G. T. Hamann, M. Jørgensen, S. B. Lange, N. H. Mikkelsen & J. Steensig.
2012. Samtalesprogets grammatik: fire fænomener og nogle metodiske overvejelser. NyS 42,
10-40. (Set d. 30/1-17)
Christensen, R. Z. & L. H. Christensen. 2009. Dansk Grammatik. Odense: Syddansk
Universitetsforlag
Crystal, D. 2006. Language and the Internet, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Crystal, D. 2011. Internet Linguistics: A Student Guide. London: Routledge
Den Danske Ordbog. 2017. Øh. URL: http://ordnet.dk/ddo/ordbog?query=%C3%B8h (tjekket d.
29/04-17)
Giles, D., W. Stommel, T. Paulus, J. Lester & D. Reed. 2015. Microanalysis Of Online Data: The
methodological development of “digital CA”. Discourse, Context and Media 7, 45-51
Hansen, E. & L. Heltoft. 2011. Grammatik over det Danske Sprog. Odense: Syddansk
Universitetsforlag
Hayano, K. 2013. Question Design in Conversation. I: Sidnell, J. & T. Stivers: The Handbook of
Conversation Analysis, 395-414
Hayashi, M. 2013. Turn Allocation and Turn Sharing. I: Sidnell, J. & T. Stivers: The Handbook of
Conversation Analysis, 395-415
Heinemann, T. 2010. The question-response system of Danish. Journal of Pragmatics 42, 2703–
2725
Heritage, J. 2013. Epistemics in Conversation. I: Sidnell, J. & T. Stivers: The Handbook of
Conversation Analysis, 370-394
Heritage, J. & G. Raymond. 2012. Navigating epistemic landscapes: acquiescence, agency and
resistance in responses to polar questions. I: Jan-Peter de Ruiter (ed.). Questions: formal,
functional and interactional perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, J. & D. R. Watson. 1979. Formulations as conversational objects. I: G. Psathas (ed.):
Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, 123 –
162.
Herring, S. (Ed.) 2010. Computer-Mediated Conversation, Part I. Language@Internet 7
Herring, S. (Ed.) 2011. Computer-Mediated Conversation, Part II. Language @Internet 8
Hougaard, T. T. 2004. Nærmest en leg: En undersøgelse af sprog og interaktion i dansk webchat.
Aarhus: Ph.D.-afhandling, Aarhus Universitet.
http://pure.au.dk/portal/files/83373693/Tina_Thode_Hougaard_N_rmest_en_leg.pdf (link
tjekket 28/04-17)
Iorio, J. 2015. Vernacular literacy: orthography and literacy practices. I: Georgakopoulou, A. & T.
Spilioti (Eds.): The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication. New
York: Routledge, 166-179
Jensen, E. S. 2014. Tale er tale; skrift er skrift: om skriftsproget i de nye medier. NyS 46, 11-38
Koch, P. & W. Oesterreicher. 1990 Gesprochene Sprache in der Romania: Französisch, Italienisch,
Spanisch (= Romanistiche Arbeitshefte 31). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Labov, W. & D, Fanshel. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New
York: Academic Press.
Marques, G. 2008. Establishing a Continuum in Spoken and Written Language in Student Emails.
In: Nørgaard, N. (Ed.): Systemic Functional Linguistics in Use. Odense Working Papers in
Language and Communication vol. 29
Maynor, N. 1994. The language of electronic mail: written speech? In: Michael B. Montgomery &
Greta D. Little (eds.). Centennial usage studies. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press. 48-
54
Mikkelsen, N. H. 2011. Betydningsforskelle ved brug af helsætning efter fordi. I: I. Schoonderbeek
Hansen & P. Widell (Eds.): 13. Møde om Udforskningen af Dansk Sprog: Aarhus Universitet
14. - 15. oktober 2010. Aarhus: Nordisk Institut, Aarhus Universitet, 13–24
Paulus, T., A. Warren & J. N. Lester. 2016. Applying conversation analysis methods to online
talk: A literature review. Discourse, Context & Media, 1-10
Raymond, G. 2010. Grammar and social relations: Alternative forms of yes/no – type initiating
actions in health visitor interactions. I: A. F. Freed & S. Ehrlich (Eds.): ‘Why do you ask?’:
The function of questions in institutional discourse. New York: Oxford University Press, 87 –
107
Samtalegrammatik.dk. 2017. Opslag. URL: http://samtalegrammatik.au.dk/opslag/ (tjekket d.
28/04-17)
Sacks, H. 1984. Notes on methodology. I: J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.): Structures of social
action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Sacks, H., E. Schegloff , & G. Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turntaking
for conversation. Language, 50 (4), 696-734.
Schegloff, E. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University
Press
Sidnell, J. 2010. Conversation Analysis. An Introduction. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell
Sidnell, J. 2013. Basic Conversation Analytic Methods. I: J. Sidnell & T. Stivers: The Handbook of
Conversation Analysis, 77-99
Sidnell, J. & T. Stivers. 2013. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell
Stivers, T., L. Mondada & J. Steensig. 2011. Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social
interaction. In: T. Stivers, L. Mondada & J. Steensig (Eds.): The Morality of Knowledge in
Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3-24
Stæhr, A. 2015. Sociale medier og hverdagssprog. In: Gregersen, F. & T. Kristiansen (Eds.) Hvad
ved vi nu – om danske talesprog? København: Sprogforandringscentret, 153-164
Thompson, .S. A.., B. A. Fox & E. Couper-Kuhlen. 2015. Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building
Responsive Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Urban Dictionary. 2017. :P. URL:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=%3AP&defid=3972044 (link tjekket d.
29/04-17)
WhatsApp. 2017. How do I use Voice Messaging?
URL:https://www.whatsapp.com/faq/en/iphone/23702247 (link tjekket 28/4-17)
Yates, S. 1996. Oral and written linguistic aspects of computer conferencing: a corpus based study.
In: Susan Herring (ed.): Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-
Cultural Perspectives
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author/the authors hold the rigths to articles presented in the journal. The author/the authors are granted the right to reproduce their article as they see fit, if they mention LWorks as the original publisher of the article.
