Good energy

Abram, S. (2018). Electricity – Electricity as a Field for Anthropological Theorising and Research. Chapter 38 in M. H. Bruun, A. Wahlberg, R. Douglas-Jones, C. Hasse, K. Hoeyer, D. B. Kristensen, and B. R. Winthereik (Eds.), Handbook of the Anthropology of Technology (pp. 741-756). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan/Springer Nature Singapore.

Abram, S., Winthereik, B. R., and Yarrow, T. (Eds.) (2020). Electrifying Anthropology - Exploring Electrical Practices and Infrastructures. New York: Routledge.

Aitken, M. (2010). Why we still don’t understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literature. Energy Policy, 38(4), 1834-1841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.060

Asdal, K. (2015). What is the issue? The transformative capacity of documents. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 16(1), 74-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2015.1022194

Asdal, K., Cointe, B., Hobæk, B., Reinertsen, H., Huse, T., Morsman, S. R., & Måløy, T. (2021). ‘The good economy’: a conceptual and empirical move for investigating how economies and versions of the good are entangled. BioSocieties, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-021-00245-5

Asdal, K. and Huse, T. (2024). Nature-made economy – cod, capital and the great economization of the ocean. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Asdal, K. and Doganova, L. (2025). Valuation and Critique in “The Good Economy”. Theme issue editorial, Part 1, Valuation Studies, 12(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3384/VS.2001-5992.2025.12.1.1-15.

Asdal, K. and Reinertsen, H. (2022). Doing Document Analysis - A Practice-Oriented Method. London: Sage Publishing.

Barry, A. (2013). Material Politics – Disputes Along the Pipeline. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Batel, S. and Rudolph, D. (2021). A Critical Approach to the Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy Infrastructures. In S. Batel & D. Rudolph (Eds.), A critical approach to the social acceptance of renewable energy infrastructures (pp. 3-19). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73699-6_1

Bauwens, T., Wade, R., and Burke, M. (2024). The energy commons: A systematic review, paradoxes, and ways forward. Energy Research & Social Science, 118(103776), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103776

Beckert, J. and Bronk, R. (2019). Uncertain Futures – Imaginaries, Narratives, and Calculative Technologies. MPIfG Discussion Paper, 19(10). Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.

Beckert, J. (2016). Imagined futures: Fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Beckert, J. and Ergen, T. (2020). Transcending history's heavy hand: The future in economic action. MPIfG Discussion Paper, 20(3). Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0005-E443-E.

Berman, E. P. (2022). Thinking like an Economist – How Efficiency Replaced Equality in U.S. Public Policy. Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Berman, E. P. N. and Hirschman, D. (2018). The sociology of quantification: Where are we now? Contemporary Sociology, 47(3), 257-266, doi: 10.1177/0094306118767649.

Birch, K. and Muniesa, F. (Eds.) (2020). Assetization: Turning Things into Assets in Technoscientific Capitalism. The MIT Press, https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12075.001.0001

Borch, K., Kirkegaard, J. K., Nyborg, S. (2023). Three Wind Farm Developments, Three Different Planning Difficulties: Cases from Denmark. Energies, http://dx.doi.org/10.20944/preprints202304.1248.v1

Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., and Van Lente, H. (2006). The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3-4), 285-298. doi: 10.1080/09537320600777002.

Bridge, G. (2009). Material worlds: Natural resources, resource geography and the material economy. Geography compass, 3(3), 1217-1244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00233.x

Brown, N., Rappert, B., and Webster, A. (Eds.) (2000). Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective TechnoScience. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

Brown, N. and Michael, M. (2003). A Sociology of Expectations: Retrospecting Prospects and Prospecting Retrospects. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(1), 3-18, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0953732032000046024

Budde, B. and Konrad, K. (2019). Tentative governing of fuel cell innovation in a dynamic network of Expectations. Research Policy, 48(5), 1098-1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.007

Çalişkan, K., MacKenzie, D. and Callon, M. (2024): Stacked economization: a research program for the study of platforms, Journal of Cultural Economy. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2024.2423687

Callon, M. (1984). ‘Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay’. In Law, J. (ed.): Power Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul: 196-233.

Callon, M. (1984). The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle. In Callon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (Eds.), Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology (pp. 19-34). Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07408-2_2

Callon, M. (1991). ‘Techno-economic networks and irreversibility’. In Law, J. (ed.): A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge: 132-161.

Callon, M. (ed.). (1998). Laws of the markets. Blackwell Publishers/The Sociological Review.

Callon, M. (2005). Why Virtualism paves the way to Political Impotence: A Reply to Daniel Miller's Critique of The Laws of the Markets. Economic Sociology: European Electronic Newsletter 6(2), 3-20.

Callon, M. (2021). Markets in the making – rethinking competition, goods, and innovation. Translated by Olivia Cuter, edited by M. Poon. Brooklyn, New York: Zone Books – near futures.

Callon, M. Millo, Y. and Muniesa, F. (eds.) (2007). Market devices. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing/The Sociological Review.

Callon, M. and Law, J. (2005). On qualculation, agency, and otherness. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23(5), 717-733. https://doi.org/10.1068/d343t

Cambrosio, A., Limoges, C. & Hoffman, E. (1992). Expertise as a Network: A Case Study of the Controversies over the Environmental Release of Genetically Modified Organisms. Pp. 341-61 in The Culture and Power of Knowledge, edited by Nico Stehr and Richard V. Ericson. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Christophers, B. (2022). Fossilised Capital: Price and Profit in the Energy Transition. New Political Economy, 27(1), 146-159, https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1926957

Clausen, L. T., Nyborg, S., & Rudolph, D. P. (2021). The good process or the great illusion: A spatial perspective on public participation in Danish municipal wind turbine planning. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 23(6), 732-751.

Cochoy, F., Trompette, P. and Araujo, L. (2016). From market agencements to market agencing: an introduction. Consumption Markets & Culture, 19(1), 3-16, https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2015.1096066

Cointe, B. (2022). Scenarios. Chapter 15 in Kari D. Pryck & Mike Hulme: A critical assessment of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, PART III: Knowledges, 137-147. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press & Assessment 2023, doi: 10.1017/9781009082099.

Cointe, B. and Asdal, K. (2025). The performativity test. Chapter 6 in Susy Geiger, Katy Mason, Neil Pollock, Philip Roscoe, Annmarie Ryan, Stefan Schwarzkopf, and Pascale Trompette (eds.) (2025). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., p. 100-113.

Collins, H. and Evans, R. (2007). Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: Chicago University Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226113623

Daggett, C. N. (2019). The birth of energy: Fossil fuels, thermodynamics and the politics of work. Dunham: Duke University Press.

Dalsgaard, S. and Kirkegaard, J. K. (work-in-progress). The power of ‘x’ – Analysing power-to-x as potential. Presentation of paper draft at STS Hub, Berlin, March 12th 2025.

Danish Energy Agency (2023). Analyseforudsætninger til Energinet 2022 – Høringsnotat, 05.01.23, J nr. 2022 – 13659.

Danish Ministry of Climate (02-2021). Ownership and Construction of Energy Islands. Aftaletekst -– Energiøer -– Ejerskab og konstruktion af energiøer mv.pdf (kefm.dk), Danish Ministry of Climate, Energy & Utilities, 1523908X.2018.1443005

Devine-Wright, P., & Howes, Y. (2010). Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.008

Dewey, J. (1939). Theory of valuation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Doganova, Liliana, Martin Giraudeau, Claes-Fredrik Helgesson, Hans Kjellberg, Francis Lee, Alexandre Mallard, Andrea Mennicken, Fabian Muniesa, Ebba Sjögren, and Teun Zuiderent-Jerak (2014). Valuation Studies and the Critique of Valuation. Valuation Studies, 2(2), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.3384/vs.2001-5992.142287.

Doganova, L. (2024). Discounting the future – the ascendancy of a political technology. Brooklyn, New York: Zone Books – near futures.

Doganova, L., and Karnøe, P. (2015). Clean and profitable: entangling valuations in environmental entrepreneurship. In A. B. Antal, M. Hutter, & D. Stark (Eds.), Moments of Valuation: Exploring Sites of Dissonance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dokk-Smith, I., Kirkegaard, J. K. and Szulecki, K. (2022). A functional approach to decentralization in the electricity sector: learning from community choice aggregation in California. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2022.2027233

Draghi, M. (2024). The future of European Competitiveness. 9th of September 2024.

DTU & AAU (2021). Cutululis, N. A., Blaabjerg, F., Østergaard, J., Bak, C. L., Anderson, M., Silva, F. M. F. D., Johannsson, H.,Wang, X., & Jørgensen, B. H. (2021). The Energy Islands: A Mars Mission for the Energy system.

Ellis, G., Schneider, N., and Wüstenhagen, R. (2023). Dynamics of social acceptance of renewable energy: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 181. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113706

Energy Island Forum (2024). Making energy islands a success. Roadmap.pdf

European Commission (2020): A hydrogen strategy for a climate-neutral Europe, Document 52020DC0301, COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS, COM/2020/301 final. Brussels, 08.07.2020.

Eyal, G. (2013). For a sociology of expertise: The social origins of the autism epidemic. American Journal of Sociology 118(4): 863-907.

Eyal, G. and Buchholz, L. (2010). From the Sociology of Intellectuals to the Sociology of Interventions. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 117-137

Fourcade, M. (2009). Economists and societies – discipline and profession in the United States, Britain, & France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Fournier, V. (2013). Commoning: on the social organisation of the commons. M@n@gement, 16(4), 433-453.

Frandsen, S. L. and Laage-Thomsen, J. (2020). Pandemic Intellectuals. Acta Sociologica, 63(4), 436-438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699320961810

Frankel, C., Ossandón, J., and Pallesen, T. (2019). The organization of markets for collective concerns and their failures. Economy and Society, 48(2), 153-174.

Frantzen, D. N. (2025). Turbulent transitions – valuation struggles and compromises in the becoming of wind energy in Denmark. PhD thesis, DTU.

Frantzen, D., Nyborg, S., Kirkegaard, J. K. (2023). Taking the Bird’s-eye view: Infrastructuring bird-turbine relations during wind power controversies. STS Encounters. https://tidsskrift.dk/encounters/article/view/139813

Geiger, S. (ed.) (2021). Healthcare activism – markets morals, & the collective good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Geiger, S. (2025). Market designs and market misfires. Part I in Susy Geiger, Katy Mason, Neil Pollock, Philip Roscoe, Annmarie Ryan, Stefan Schwarzkopf, and Pascale Trompette (eds.) (2025). Market Studies Mapping, Theorizing and Impacting Market Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., p. 19-22.

Geiger, S., Harrison, D., Kjellberg, H. and Mallard, A. (eds.) (2015). Concerned markets – economic ordering for multiple values. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Geiger, S., Mason, K., Pollock, N., Roscoe, P., Ryan A., Schwarzkopf, S. and Trompette, P. (eds.) (2025). Market Studies Mapping, Theorizing and Impacting Market Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gibson-Graham, J. K., Cameron, J., & Healy, S. (2016). Commoning as a postcapitalist politics 1. In Amin, A., & Howell, P. (Eds.). Releasing the Commons. Rethinking the future of the commons, (pp. 192-212). Routledge.

Grandclément, C. and Nadaï, A. (2018). Transitioning Trough Markets, with contributions from Béatrice Cointe, Vincent Banos, Jeofrey Dehez, Olivier Labussière, and Tomas Reverdy. Chapter 3 in Energy Transitions – a socio-technical inquiry, 101-142. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.

Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. In: American Journal of Sociology 91, S. 481–510.

Haakonsson, S., Kirkegaard, J. K., and Lema, R. (2020). The decomposition of innovation in Europe and China’s catch-up in wind power technology: the role of KIBS. European Planning Studies, 1-19, https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1712329

Hardie I. and Mackenzie D. (2007). Assembling an economic actor: the agencement of a Hedge Fund. The Sociological Review, 55(1), 57-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00682.x

Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248.

Helgesson, C-F. and Muniesa, F. (2013). For What It’s Worth: An Introduction to Valuation Studies. Valuation Studies, 1(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3384/vs.2001-5992.13111

Hess, D. J. (2011). Electricity Transformed: Neoliberalism and Local Energy in the United States. Antipode, 43(4), 1056-1077. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00842.x

Hess, D. J. (2019). Coalitions, Framing, and the Politics of Energy Transitions: Local Democracy and Community Choice in California. Energy Research & Social Science, 50, 38-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.11.013

Hess, D. J. and Sovacool, B. K. (2020). Sociotechnical matters: Reviewing and integrating science and technology studies with energy social science. Energy Research & Social Science 65, 101462, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101462

Hirschman, D. and Berman, E. P. (2014). Do economists make policies? On the political effects of economics. Socio-Economic Review, 12, 779-811. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu017

Huron, A. (2015). Working with strangers in saturated space: Reclaiming and maintaining the urban commons. Antipode, 47(4), 963-979. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12141

Jenkins, K., McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H. and Rehner, R. (2016). Energy justice: A conceptual review. Energy Research & Social Science, 11, 174-182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004

Kama, K. (2015). Circling the economy: resource‐making and marketization in EU electronic waste policy. Area, 47(1), 16-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12143

Karnøe, P., Kirkegaard, J. K., and Çalişkan, K. (2022). Introducing the lens of markets-in-the-making to Transition Studies: The case of the Danish wind power market agencement. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 44, 79-91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.05.003.

Karnøe, P. and Kirkegaard, J. K. (2025, forthcoming). Windpowering Denmark - How a series of experimentations transformed the role of wind power in Danish society. Submitted for Handbook on Living Labs and Real-World Experiments, edited by Brice Laurent and Sebastian Pfotenhauer, Edward Elgar. (accepted chapter, book to be published 2025).

Kirkegaard, Julia K. (2015). Ambiguous Winds of Change – Or Fighting Against Windmills in Chinese Wind Power: Mapping Controversies over a Potential Turn to Quality in Chinese Wind Power. Frederiksberg: CBS [Phd], 2015. 486 p. (PhD Series; No. 05-2015). Publication: Research › Ph.D. thesis.

Kirkegaard, J. K. (2019). Wind Power in China – Ambiguous Winds of Change in China’s Energy Market. Routledge: New York. (edt. Peter Sowden and Peter Nolan; Routledge Studies on the Chinese Economy).

Kirkegaard, J. K. (2023). Jordejere og projektudviklere laver hemmelige kontrakter om, hvor vindmøller skal stå, 26th of March 2023; Videnskab.dk. Forskerzonen, https://videnskab.dk/teknologi/jordejere-og-projektudviklere-laver-hemmelige-kontrakter-om-hvor-vindmoeller-skal-staa/

Kirkegaard, J. K., Cronin, T., Nyborg, S. and Karnøe, P. (2020). Paradigm shift in Danish wind power – the (un)sustainable transformation of a sector. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 23(1), 97-113, DOI:10.1080/1523908X.2020.1799769.

Kirkegaard, J. K. and Çalişkan, K. (2018). When Socialists Marketize: The Case of China’s Wind Power Market Sector. Journal of Cultural Economy, 12(2), 154-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2018.1544581

Kirkegaard, J. K. (2017). Tackling Chinese Upgrading Through Experimentalism and Pragmatism: The Case of China’s Wind Turbine Industry. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 46(2), 7-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810261704600202

Kirkegaard, J. K. and Nyborg, S. (2021). ANT perspective on wind power planning and social acceptance. Book chapter for S. Batel & D. P. Rudolph (2021): A critical approach to the social acceptance of renewable energy infrastructures – Going beyond green growth and sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan.

Kirkegaard, J. K., Cronin, T., Nyborg, S. and Frantzen, D. (2025). The multiple understandings of wind turbine noise: The unruly epistemic object of noise. Wind Energy Science https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-34

Kirkegaard, J. K., Nyborg, S., Georg, S., and Horst, M. (2023). Towards failed renewable energy communities? Activist attempts to change market conditions in the Danish wind energy market. Energy Research & Social Science, 102, 103152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103152

Kirkegaard, J. K., Rudolph, D. P., Cronin, T., Nyborg, S. (2022). The landrush of wind energy, its socio-material workings, and its political consequences: On the entanglement of land and wind assemblages in Denmark. Environment and Planning:C (EPC). https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544221143657

Kirkegaard, J. K., Rudolph, D., Nyborg, S., Solman, H., Gill, E., Hallisey, M., Cronin, T. (2023). Tackling the Grand Challenge of climate change through a socio-technical perspective and the case of wind energy. Nature Energy, 8, 655-664, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-023-01266-z

Kirkegaard, Pallesen, Breslau, Cronin (forthcoming). Energy tragedies. Organizing energy resources between commodification and commonification. Workshop paper presented at IMSW, June 2025.

Kjellberg, H. (2021). Market expertise at work: introducing Alvin E. Roth and Michel Callon. AMS Review, 11(3/4), 216-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-021-00217-9

Kjellberg, H. (2025). A vocabulary for analysing market change processes. Chapter 27, Part VI, in Market Studies Mapping, Theorizing and Impacting Market Action, pp. 438-454, Cambridge University Press 438-444. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009413961.034

Knorr-Cetina, K. (1997). Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, culture & society, 14(4), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327697014004001

Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvxw3q7f

Kuchler, M. and Bridge, G. (2018). Down the black hole: Sustaining national socio-technical imaginaries of coal in Poland. Energy Research & Social Science, 41, 136-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.014

Labussière, O. and Nadaï, A. (2018). Energy Transitions – a socio-technical inquiry. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.

Labussière, O., Banos, V., Fontaine, A., Verdeil, E., Nadaï, A. (2018). The Spatialities of Energy Transition Processes, with contributions from Jeofrey Dehez, Laurence Rocher, and Antoine Tabourdeau. Chapter 6 in Energy Transitions – a socio-technical inquiry, 239-276. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.

Lamont, M. (2012). Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 201-21. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120022

Latour, B. (1983). Give me a laboratory and I will move the world. Ch. 6 in Knorr, K. et Mulkay, M. (eds.): Science Observed. Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. Beverly Hills, California: Sage, 141-170. http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/12-GIVEME-A-LAB-GB.pdf

Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (1990). Technology is Society Made Durable. The Sociological Review, 38(1), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03350.x

Latour, B. (1992). ‘Where are the missing masses: Sociology of a few mundane artefacts’. In Bijker, W. and Law, J. (eds.): Shaping Technology-Building Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 225-259.

Law, J. (1994): Organizing Modernity: Social Ordering and Social Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

Latour, Bruno. 2005. Critical distance or critical proximity. Unpublished Manuscript. Accessed March 31, 2014. http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/def ault/files/p-113-haraway.pdf.

Linebaugh, P. (2008). The Magna Carta manifesto: Liberties and commons for all. Univ of California Press.

McFall, L. (2014). Consumption: Cultural Economies of Insurance, Credit and Spending, 1–196. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203147870

Mirowski, P. (1989), More heat than light – economics as social physics: Physics as nature’s economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mouffe, C. (2011). On the Political. Routledge.

Muniesa, F. (2011). A flank movement in the understanding of valuation. Sociological Review, 59, 24-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02056.x

Munk, A. K. (2022). Caring as Critical Proximity: A Call for Toolmaking in Digital Migration Studies. In: Sandberg, M., Rossi, L., Galis, V., Bak Jørgensen, M. (eds) Research Methodologies and Ethical Challenges in Digital Migration Studies. Approaches to Social Inequality and Difference. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81226-3_10

Nadaï, A. and Cointe, B. (2020). Turning Sunlit Rooftops and Windy Sites into Energy Assets, chapter 6 in Kean Birch and Fabian Muniesa (eds.), Assetization: Turning Things into Assets in Technoscientific Capitalism, 49-169, https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12075.003.0009

Ossandón, J. (2024). Local economic planning as a problem for market studies. Notes after Asdal & Huse’s Nature-made economy: cod, capital, and the great economization of the ocean, Journal of Cultural Economy, https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2024.2423704

Ossandón, J. & Onto, G. (2022). Do ethnographers make markets? Cultural Economy after collaboration. Presented at the EGOS conference, Vienna, 7-9 July 2022; sub-track 33: Organization of market imperfection & market designers as market organizers.

Ossandón, J. and Pallesen, T. (2025): The new new economic sociology – the market intervention test. Journal of Cultural Economy, https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2025.2451252

Ossandón, Pallesen, Karnøe and Georg (2025). Making Good Economies with Bad Economic Instruments: A brief history of wind power’s changing economies. Valuation Studies, 12(1), 67-95. https://doi.org/10.3384/VS.2001-5992.2025.12.1.67-95

Ostrom, E. (2008): Tragedy of the Ecological Commons, Encyclopedia of Ecology, 3573-3576, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00634-0.

Pallesen, Trine. 2016. Valuation Struggles over Pricing – Determining the Worth of Wind Power. Journal of Cultural Economy, 9(6), 527-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2016.1212084

Pollock, N. and Williams, R. (2010). The business of expectations: How promissory organizations shape technology and innovation. Social Studies of Science, 40(4), 525-548.

Rudolph, D. P. and Kirkegaard, J. K. (2019). Making space for wind farms: Practices of territorial stigmatisation in rural Denmark. Antipode 51(2), 642-663. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12428

Ryan, A. (2025: Future (Imperfect) Markets. Part VII, in Geiger, S., Mason, K., Pollock, N., Roscoe, P., Ryan A., Schwarzkopf, S. and Trompette, P. (eds). Market Studies Mapping, Theorizing and Impacting Market Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 455-458.

Solman, H., Kirkegaard, J. K., Kloppenburg, S. (2023). Wind energy and noise: Forecasting the future sounds of wind energy projects and facilitating Dutch community participation. Energy Research & Social Science, 98(103037), 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103037

Solman, H., Kirkegaard, J. K., Smits, M., van Vliet, B. & Bush, S. (2021). The promises and perils of digital twins for wind turbine innovation: Boundary conditions for (co-)production of wind energy technologies and landscapes by the experts, and the public? Environmental Science & Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103037

Stark, D. (2000). For a Sociology of Worth. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251651120_For_a_Sociology_of_Worth

Stark, D. (2009). The sense of dissonance – accounts of worth in economic life. Woodstock, Oxfordshire: Princeton University Press.

van Lente, H. & Rip, A. (1998). Expectations in technological developments: an example of prospective structures to be filled by agency, in: C. Disco & B. van der Meulen (Eds.), Getting New Technologies Together – Studies in Making Sociotechnical Order. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Whatmore, S. J. (2009). Mapping knowledge controversies: science, democracy and the redistribution of expertise. Progress in Human Geography, 33(5), 587-598.

Woolgar, S., & Lezaun, J. (2013). The wrong bin bag: A turn to ontology in science and technology studies?. Social studies of science 43(3), 321-340.

Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., and Bürer, M. J. (2007). Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2683-2691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.00

www.stm.dk: Mette Frederiksens nytårstale 1. januar 2022. Mette Frederiksens nytårstale 1. januar 2022 - Statsministeriet