Responding to Emergencies:

An Experiment in Facilitating Professional Development by Means of Big Qualitative Data

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/stse.v17i3.158665

Keywords:

Participatory Data Design, Emergency Response, Experimentation, Digital STS

Abstract

This article reports an experiment in turning more than 300 recorded calls to an emergency response centre into a visual data format for the purpose of facilitating a process of collective exploration and learning among a group of emergency responders.  The article begins by introducing an emerging experimental and interventionist practice in digital STS that inspired the experiment. In the next section, it explores the unique nature and organization of work in an emergency response centre. The article proceeds with a description of how we prepared data and a workshop, followed by an account of how the emergency responders engaged with the data and data visualizations during the workshop. In the final section, the article discusses the opportunities and challenges of pursuing an interventionist STS approach using organizational data and participatory engagement of actors in a high-stake professional environment. We argue that a meaningful integration of new forms of data requires careful consideration of both technical affordances and organizational contexts. We also point to the inherently unpredictable ways of professional groups’ engagement with and use of data, specifically the emergency responders’ persistent efforts to reconfigure both data and methodology.

Author Biographies

Andreas Møller Underbjerg, The Techno-Anthropology Lab (TANTlab), Aalborg University

Andreas Møller Underbjerg holds a master's degree in data driven organizational development and focuses on data utilization within high-stake organizations, drawing on extensive experience in environments where precision and timing are critical. His work examines data utilization in high-stake organizations as well as data-driven decision-making processes under time pressure and in high-consequence situations. He is particularly interested in the role of data utilization in these critical organizational contexts, and the tensions that emerge when technological solutions encounter human judgment under pressure.

Torben Elgaard Jensen, The Techno-Anthropology Lab (TANTlab), Aalborg University

Torben Elgaard Jensen is professor of Science & Technology Studies and leader of The Techno-Anthropology Lab at Aalborg University. He is the co-founder and former chairman of the Danish association for STS. His research examines innovation, knowledge construction and user involvement across different contexts. He has conducted ethnographic studies of engineering companies, start-up firms, public sector organizations and research groups. His most recent research explores how publics, organizations and authorities respond to the challenges of digitalization and AI.

References

Abildgaard, M. S., Birkbak, A., Jensen, T. E., Madsen, A. K., & Munk, A. K. (2017). Playgrounding techno-anthropology. EASST Review, 36(2), 35-38.

Birkbak, A., & Munk, A. K. (2017). Digitale metoder (1. udgave). Hans Reitzels Forlag.

Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2012.678878

Crawford, K. (2021). The atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300252392

Ehn, P., & Kyng, M. (1992). Cardboard computers: Mocking it up or hands-on the future. In Design at Work (pp. 169–196). L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, USA. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003063988-11

Elgaard Jensen, T., Kleberg Hansen, A. K., Ulijaszek, S., Munk, A. K., Madsen, A. K., Hillersdal, L., & Jespersen, A. P. (2019). Identifying notions of environment in obesity research using a mixed methods approach. Obesity Reviews, 20(4), 621-630. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12807

Jacomy, M., Venturini, T., Heymann, S., & Bastian, M. (2014). ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PLoS ONE, 9(6): e98679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679

Jensen, T. E., Birkbak, A., Madsen, A. K., & Munk, A. K. (2021). Participatory Data Design: Acting in a digital world. In G. Downey & T. Zuiderent-Jerak (Eds.) Making & doing: Activating STS through knowledge expression and travel. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11310.003.0008

Jensen, T. E., Madsen, A. K., Misfeldt, M., Munk, A. K., & Tamborg, A. L. (2017). Participatorisk data design: En ressource for capacity building. In Samskabelse og Capacity Building i den offentlige sektor (pp. 171–195). Hans Reitzels Forlag.

Kim, S.W., & Gil, J.M. (2019). Research paper classification systems based on TF–IDF and LDA schemes. Human-Centric Computing and Information Sciences, 9, 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13673-019-0192-7

Latour, B. (2007). Beware, your imagination leaves digital traces. Times Higher Literary Supplement, 6(4), 129–131.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511815355.003

Leskovec, J., Rajaraman, A., & Ullmann, J. D. (2014). Mining of massive datasets. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139924801.002

Madsen, A. K. (2023). Digital methods as ‘experimental apriori’ – How to navigate vague empirical situations as an operationalist pragmatist. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 30(1), 94–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221144260

Madsen, A.K., Søltoft, J.I, & Klitgaard, A. (2025). Datafantasi: Fra styring til læring i en verden af vilde problemer. In J. Nørlem, N. Klee, & M. R. F. Andersen (Eds.). Organisatorisk Læring og Forandring – Individer, grupper og processer. Samfundslitteratur.

Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Munk, A. K., Meunier, A., & Venturini, T. (2019). Data sprints: A collaborative format in digital controversy mapping. Digital STS: A field guide for science & technology studies (pp. 472–496). https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691190600-032

Pratyaskh, J. (2021). Basics of CountVectorizer. https://towardsdatascience.com/basics-of-countvectorizer-e26677900f9c

Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Xu, T., Brockman, G., McLeavey, C., & Sutskever, I. (2022). Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision. ArXiv 2212.04356. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.04356

Ratner, H. F., & Schrøder, I. (2024). Ethical plateaus in Danish child protection services: the rise and demise of algorithmic models. Science & Technology Studies, 37(3), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.126011

Runciman, D. (2023). The handover: How we gave control of our lives to corporations, states and AIs. Liveright Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-025-01086-9

Ruppert, E., Isin, E., & Bigo, D. (2017). Data politics. Big Data & Society, 4(2), 2053951717717749. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717717749

Ruppert, E., Law, J., & Savage, M. (2013). Reassembling social science methods: The challenge of digital devices. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(4), 22–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413484941

Suchman, L. (2023). The uncontroversial ‘thingness’ of AI. Big Data & Society, 10(2), 20539517231206794. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231206794

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.

Ørngreen, R., Munk, A. K., Knudsen, S. P., Søltoft, J. I., Hansen, H. H., Jacomy, M., & Knudsen, A. G. (2023). Forstå din datafantasi (en radar model for datafantasien). Aalborg Universitet.

Non-important decorative frontpage of article.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-12

How to Cite

Møller Underbjerg, A., & Elgaard Jensen, T. (2025). Responding to Emergencies:: An Experiment in Facilitating Professional Development by Means of Big Qualitative Data. STS Encounters, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.7146/stse.v17i3.158665