Team Role Dynamics in Collaborative Research Teams: A Key to Participatory School Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/ejie.v4i2.162043Keywords:
participatory school development, collaborative research, team roles, concept-mapping mediated interviewsAbstract
In recent decades, schools have faced increasing pressure to meet external expectations for quality and outcomes, requiring school teams, especially when dealing with a (super)diverse student populations, to provide efficient and context-specific responses. Collaborative research emerges as an attractive approach, wherein teams systematically reflect on their educational practices and (should) take data- and evidence-informed action to enhance students’ learning. Involving additional stakeholders, such as students and in-service teachers, is considered beneficial, also in preparing pre-service teachers for inclusive education albeit under certain conditions. The current study, therefore, seeks to investigate the complex dynamics and expectations among diverse actors within collaborative research teams engaged in school development processes. This single case study unfolded at the Brussels CityScope Lyceum, where a collaborative research intervention was launched during the 2022-2023 school year to strengthen the student-teacher relationships through the implementation of bi-monthly student talks. This school development process involved a diverse team, including teachers, students, pre-service teachers, a school leader and a teacher educator. Individual concept map-mediated interviews, based on Mumford et al.'s (2008) theoretical framework on team roles for school development, were conducted with 13 members of the collaborative research team. These interviews explored participants’ perceptions of role allocation and conceptualization within the team, as well as their views on how these roles contributed to breakthroughs in the school development process. The resulting dataset was subjected to a combined deductive and inductive analysis strategy. The results unveil a landscape of both overlapping and diverging perspectives regarding role allocation and conceptualization among the actors of the collaborative research team. Moreover, the analysis delineates four distinct categories of breakthroughs that propelled the school development process forward in this particular case, with the following roles proving crucial: (1) cooperators and communicators foster connected communication and interaction, (2) contributors and critics enhance the enriching diversity of perspectives, (3) the consul role contributes to supportive leadership, and (4) creators and contractors guide processes of co-creation. The findings suggest that although all team roles are fulfilled, actors' expectations towards each other are only partially met, indicating potential for growth in creating truly participatory, reciprocal spaces for collaborative research. Despite these divergences, roles critical to the transformative potential of the school development process are assumed by multiple actors, possibly contributing to the success of the collaborative research in this case.
References
Antonsen, Y., Aspfors, J., & Maxwell, G. (2024). Early career teachers’ role in school development and professional learning. Professional Development in Education, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2024.2306998
Ball, S. J. (2016). Neoliberal education? Confronting the slouching beast. Policy futures in education, 14(8), 1046–1059. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210316664259
Black, R., & Mayes, E. (2020). Feeling voice: The emotional politics of ‘student voice’ for teachers. British Educational Research Journal, 46(5), 1064-1080. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3613
Blase, J. J. (1987). The Politics of Teaching: The Teacher-Parent Relationship and the Joseph J. Blase Dynamics of Diplomacy. Journal of Teacher Education, 38(2), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718703800212
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Burke, C. S., Georganta, E., & Marlow, S. (2019). A Bottom Up Perspective to Understanding the Dynamics of Team Roles in Mission Critical Teams. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01322
Burnaford, G. (1999). Teacher action research as professional development in schools: Four paths toward change. School wide inquiry: A self-study of an “outside” teacher researcher. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. K. (2013). Coding In-depth Semistructured Interviews: Problems of Unitization and Intercoder Reliability and Agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113500475
Catelli, L. A. (1995). Action research and collaborative inquiry in a school university partnership. Action in Teacher Education, 16(4), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.1995.10463216
Coburn, C. E., & Stein, M. K. (2010). Research and practice in education: Building alliances, bridging the divide. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1992). Communities for teacher research fringe or forefront. American Journal of Education, 100(3), 298–324. https://doi.org/10.1086/444019
Cochran-Smith, M., Ell, F., Grudnoff, L., Haigh, M., Hill, M., & Ludlow, L. (2016). Initial teacher education: What does it take to put equity at the center? Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tate.2016.03.006
Cook-Sather, A. (2020). Student voice across contexts: Fostering student agency in today’s schools. Theory into practice, 59(2), 182-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1705091
Cook-Sather, A., & Alter, Z. (2011). What Is and What Can Be: How a Liminal Position Can Change Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: What Is and What Can Be. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 42(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1492.2010.01109.x
Crockett, M.D. (2002). Inquiry as professional development: creating dilemmas through teachers’ work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(5), 609-624. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00019-7
Damber, U., Hermansson, C., Andersson, B., & Jendis, M. (2022). Factors facilitating and obstructing a school development project. Education Inquiry, 13(4), 428-446. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.1929751
Departement Onderwijs & Vorming (2023). Overzicht leerlingkenmerken secundair onderwijs 2022-2023. https://data-onderwijs.vlaanderen.be/documenten/bestanden/Publicaties_Leerlingenkenmerken_Overzicht_2022-2023_so_1.xlsx
Dewey, J. (2001). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Macmillan. (Original work published 1916).
Driskell, T., Driskell, J. E., Burke, C. S., & Salas, E. (2017). Team Roles: A Review and Integration. Small Group Research, 48(4), 482-511. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496417711529
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/0.2307/258557
Finlay, L. (2006). ‘Rigour’,‘ethical integrity’or ‘artistry’? Reflexively reviewing criteria for evaluating qualitative research. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(7), 319-326. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802260606900704
Fishman, S. M., & McCarthy, L. P. (2000). Unplayed tapes: A personal history of collaborative teacher research. New York: Teachers College Columbia University.
Galiani, S., Gertler, P., & Schargrodsky, E. (2008). School decentralization: Helping the good get better, but leaving the poor behind. Journal of public economics, 92(10-11), 2106-2120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.05.004
Gamage, D. (2005). School-based management leads to shared responsibility and quality in education. Curriculum and Teaching, 20(1), 61-77. https://doi.org/10.7459/es/24.1.03
Gustafsson, J. (2017). Single case studies vs. Multiple case studies: A comparative study. Academy of Business, Engineering and Science, Halmstad University.
Hargreaves, A. (2019). Teacher collaboration: 30 years of research on its nature, forms, limitations and effects. Teachers & teaching, 25 (5), 603–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1639499
Hays, D. G., & McKibben, W. B. (2021). Promoting Rigorous Research: Generalizability and Qualitative Research. Journal of Counseling & Development, 99(2), 178-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12365
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
Henson, R. K. (2001). The effects of participation in teacher research on teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 819–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00033-6
Hillen, S. A. (2020). School Staff-centered School Development by Communicative Action: Working Methods for Creating Collective Responsibility – From the Idea to Action. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 13(4), 189-203. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2020.130403
Honingh, M., & Hooge, E. (2013). The effect of school-leader support and participation in decision making on teacher collaboration in Dutch primary and secondary schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(1), 75-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213499256
Iacob, C., & Faily, S. (2019). Exploring the gap between the student expectations and the reality of teamwork in undergraduate software engineering group projects. Journal of systems and software, 157, 110393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.110393
Juma, S., Lehtomäki, E., & Naukkarinen, A. (2017). Scaffolding teachers to foster inclusive pedagogy and presence through collaborative action research. Educational Action Research, 25 5(5), 720-736. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2016.1266957
Kairienė, A. (2018). Toward a Broader Understanding: A Formal Concept Analysis of the Micropolitics of a School. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia, 40, 127-141. https://doi.org/10.15388/actpaed.2018.0.11892
Kameshwara, K. K., Sandoval-Hernandez, A., Shields, R., Dhanda, K. R. (2020). A false promise? Decentralization in education systems across the globe. International Journal of Educational Research, 104, 101669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101669
Kandiko Howson, C. B., and I. M. Kinchin. 2014. “Mapping the Doctorate: A Longitudinal Study of PhD Students and Their Supervisors.” In Cases on Teaching Critical Thinking through Visual Representation Strategies, edited by L. Shedletsky, and J. S. Beaudry, 445–464. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Kinchin, I. M., Alpay, E., Curtis, K., Franklin, J., Rivers, C., & Winstone, N. E. (2016). Charting the elements of pedagogic frailty. Educational Research, 58(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2015.1129115
Kolleck, N., Schuster, J., Hartmann, U., & Gräsel, C. (2021). Teachers’ professional collaboration and trust relationships: An inferential social network analysis of teacher teams. Research in Education, 111(1), 89-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/00345237211031585
Kuper, A., Lingard, L., & Levinson, W. (2008). Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 337, a1035. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1035
Leithwood, K., & Earl, L. (2000). Educational Accountability Effects: An International Perspective. Peabody Journal of Education, 75(4), 1–18. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1493050
Levin, B. B., & Rock, T. C. (2003). The Effects Of Collaborative Action Research On Preservice And Experienced Teacher Partners In Professional Development Schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(2), 135-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102250287
Levinson, M., Geron, T., & Brighouse, H. (2022). Conceptions of Educational Equity. AERA Open, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584221121344
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Mayes, E., Black, R., & Finneran, R. (2021). The possibilities and problematics of student voice for teacher professional learning: Lessons from an evaluation study. Cambridge Journal of Education, 51(2), 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2020.1806988
McGhie-Richmond, D., & Haider, F. (2020). Collaborating for Inclusion: The Intersecting Roles of Teachers, Teacher Education, and School Leaders in Translating Research into Practice. Exceptionality Education International, 30(2), 32-50. https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v30i2.11080
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., & Saldaña J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook and The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3. Ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2015.975966
Mitra, D. (2018). Student voice in secondary schools: The possibility for deeper change. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(5), 473-487. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-01-2018-0007
Mitra, D. L., & Gross, S. J. (2009). Increasing Student Voice in High School Reform: Building Partnerships, Improving Outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(4), 522-543. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143209334577
Mumford, T. V., Van Iddekinge, C. H., Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2008). The Team Role Test: Development and validation of a team role knowledge situational judgment test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 250-267. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.250
Nelson, E. (2021). Student voice in pedagogical decision-making: Nexus of transformation and problematic alliance. The Australian Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-020-00419-3
Oppi, P., Eisenschmidt, E., & Jõgi, A.-L. (2022). Teacher’s readiness for leadership – a strategy for school development. School Leadership & Management, 42(1), 79-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2021.2016685
Postholm, M. B. (2019). The school leader’s role in school-based development. Educational Research, 61(4), 437-450. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1677171
Roulston, K., & Shelton, S. A. (2015). Reconceptualizing Bias in Teaching Qualitative Research Methods. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(4), 332-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414563803
Sjölund, S., Lindvall, J., Larsson, M., & Ryve, A. (2023). Mapping roles in research-practice partnerships – a systematic literature review. Educational Review, 75(7), 1490-1518. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.2023103
Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative Case Studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Sage Publications Ltd.
Stewart, G. L., Fulmer, I. S., and Barrick, M. R. (2005). An exploration of member roles as a multilevel linking mechanism for individual traits and team outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 343–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00480.x
Strijbos, J., & Engels, N. (2024). A Multifaceted Portrait of Students’ Connectedness to Urban Schools. Urban Education, 59(5), 1489-1522. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859221081769
Strijbos, J., & Engels, N. (2023). Micropolitical strategies in student-teacher partnerships: Students’ and teachers’ perspectives on student voice experiences. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 17461979231206915. https://doi.org/10.1177/17461979231206915
Thomas, G. (2013). A review of thinking and research about inclusive education policy, with suggestions for a new kind of inclusive thinking. British Educational Research Journal, 39(3), 473-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2011.652070
Trochim, M. K., & Trochim, W. M. K. (2007). Concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Sage Publications.
Tseng, V., Fleischman, S., & Quintero, E. (2018). Democratizing evidence in education. In B. Bevan & W. Penuel (Eds.), Connecting research and practice for educational improvement: Ethical and equitable approaches (pp. 3–16). Routledge.
Tveit, A. D., & Kovacˇ, V. B. (2020). Organisational Challenges for School Development and Improvement: The Obstructing Role of Sub-Groups and an Overly Positive School Culture. International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, 9(1), 27–42. www.issbs.si/press/ISSN/2232-5697/9_27-42.pdf
Van Peteghem, H., & Consuegra, E. (2021). Aandacht voor culturele diversiteit in de (leraren)opleiding. In Diversiteit in het hoger onderwijs: van theoretisch kader naar praktijkgerichte verandering (p. 129-145). ASP Academic and Scientific Publishers.
Van Peteghem, H., & Consuegra, E. (2023). Leraren opleiden voor culturele diversiteit: Hoe de theoriepraktijkkloof te dichten in de lerarenopleidingen in Brussel. Paper presented at VELOV/VELON Conference, Bruges, Belgium.
Welch, C., & Piekkari, R. (2017). How should we (not) judge the ‘quality’ of qualitative research? A re-assessment of current evaluative criteria in International Business. Journal of World Business, 52(5), 714-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.05.007
Willegems, V. (2020). Inside Stories of Collaborative Teacher Research Teams: Spaces for Developing Extended Professionalism in School-university Partnerships. Unpublished PhD thesis.
Willegems, V., Consuegra, E., Engels, N., Struyven, K. (2016). Onderzoekende School?! Professionaliseren tot de vierde macht. Of: hoe bruggen bouwen tussen lerarenopleiding en werkveld. Impuls voor onderwijsbegeleiding, 46(4), 156-165.
Williams, K. C., Morgan, K., & Cameron, B. A. (2011). How do students define their roles and responsibilities in online learning group projects?. Distance Education, 32(1), 49-62.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (Sixth edition). SAGE.
Ylimaki, R. M., & Brunderman, L. A. (Red.). (2022). Evidence-Based School Development in Changing Demographic Contexts (Vol. 24). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76837-9
Zamecnik, A., Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Grossmann, G., Ladjal, D., & Pardo, A. (2024). The perceptions of task cohesion in collaborative learning teams. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 19(3), 369-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-024-09424-5
Zeichner, K. (2003). Teacher research as professional development for P–12 educators in the USA. Educational Action Research, 11(2), 301–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790300200211
Zeichner, K. (2014). The struggle for the soul of teaching and teacher education in the USA. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(5), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2014.956544
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jetske Strijbos, Emma Van Malderen, Vicky Willegems, Els Consuegra, Joost Vaesen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License (full legal code).
