Introduction: Teacher Education for Inclusion - Policies and Practices in Europe (TEIPPE)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/ejie.v4i2.161018Keywords:
teacher education, policy, collaboration, European alliancesAbstract
This introduction situates inclusive teacher education within global and policy contexts that link academic quality with social justice. Following Cochran-Smith et al. (2016), it highlights a persistent tension in teacher education between excellence and equity. Growing migration, widening inequalities and diversity movements have intensified these challenges. Since the Salamanca Statement (UNESCO, 1994) and the Education 2030 Framework (UNESCO, 2015), inclusion has evolved from integrating pupils with disabilities to embracing diversity across race, gender, class and ability, while recent research (Artiles & Kozleski, 2007; Walton, 2016) emphasises the cultural and power dimensions of inclusion.
Teacher education occupies a strategic position in addressing these systemic inequities. Van Peteghem & Consuegra (2021) reviewed twenty-six meta-studies and identified ten key principles for preparing teachers for inclusion—from integrating inclusive values across curricula to using digital tools that promote accessibility. These principles underpin the Teacher Education for Inclusion: Policies and Practices in Europe (TEIPPE) special issue, which draws on collaborative research within the EUTOPIA European University alliance (France, Belgium, Spain, Sweden, Ireland). The issue analyses how teacher-education programmes enact inclusive policies and practices across contexts, using Van Peteghem & Consuegra’s framework to link empirical studies and theoretical advances.
In this introduction of the special issue, we present the context, what is at stake, the ten principles and how each contribution is related to these principles.
References
Artiles, A. J., & Kozleski, E. (2007). Beyond convictions: Interrogating culture, history, and power in inclusive education. Language Arts, 84, 357-364.
Biesta, G. (2012). The future of teacher education: Evidence, competence or wisdom? Research on Steiner Education, 3, 8–21.
Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2016). The Index for Inclusion: A Guide to School Development by Inclusive Values. Index for Inclusion Network.
https://www.ph-noe.ac.at/fileadmin/root_phnoe/Forschung/Migration/Index_curriculum_pages.pdf
Cochran‑Smith, M., Ell, F., Grudnoff, L., Haigh, M., Hill, M., & Ludlow, L. (2016). Initial teacher education: What does it take to put equity at the centre? Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.006
Darling‑Hammond, L. (2010). The Flat World and Education: How America’s Commitment to Equity Will Determine Our Future. Teachers College Press.
Fenoglio, P. « L’éducation inclusive et numérique : quelles convergences ? », Dossier de veille de l’IFÉ n° 146, janvier 2024, ENS de Lyon. En ligne : https://miniurl.be/r-5fc0.
Florian, L. & Beaton, M. (2017). Understanding inclusive pedagogy in the digital age. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(9), 991–1006
Freire, P. (1968/2005). Pedagogy of the Oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). Continuum.
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice. Teachers College Press.
Gay, G., & Kirkland, K. (2003). Developing cultural critical consciousness and self‑reflection in preservice teacher education. Theory into Practice, 42(3), 181–187.
Hobson, A. J., Ashby, P., Malderez, A., & Tomlinson, P. D. (2009). Mentoring beginning teachers: What we know and what we don’t. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 207–216.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McLeskey, J., & Waldron, N. L. (2011). Educational programs for elementary students with learning disabilities: Can they be both effective and inclusive? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(1), 48–57.
OECD. (2019). The Road to Integration: Education and Migration. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/d8ceec5d-en.
UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2015). Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4. UNESCO.
Van Peteghem, H. (2021). Leraren opleiden voor etnisch-culturele diversiteit: Hoe de theorie-praktijkkloof te dichten in de lerarenopleidingen in Brussel [Master’s thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel]. Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Van Peteghem, H., & Consuegra, E. (2021). Aandacht voor culturele diversiteit in de (leraren)opleiding. In Diversiteit in het hoger onderwijs: van theoretisch kader tot praktische tips (pp. 125–152). Academia Press.
Villegas, A. M., & Irvine, J. J. (2010). Diversifying the teaching force: An examination of major arguments. In Handbook of Research on Teacher Education: Enduring Questions and Changing Contexts (3rd ed., pp. 175–192). New York, NY: Routledge / Taylor & Francis Group.
Walton, E. (2016). The language of inclusive education: Exploring, speaking, listening, reading and writing. Routledge.Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 89–99.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muriel Epstein
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License (full legal code).
