Metaphors of inclusive education

Conference reflections from the Global South

Authors

  • Susan Nacey University of Inland Norway

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/ejie.v4i1.152381

Keywords:

inclusive education, Nepal, Global South, metaphor, conference reflections, JOURNEY metaphor

Abstract

This paper examines metaphorical frameworks employed at the 2024 International Conference on Perspectives and Practices of Inclusive Education in Kathmandu, Nepal. Drawing on observations from keynote addresses, conference papers, panel discussions and informal conversations during the two-day conference, the paper reflects on the dominant metaphors present in the discourse of inclusive education in the Global South.

Metaphors are fundamental tools through which humans make sense of complex realities, operating far beyond mere linguistic decoration to shape our understanding and potentially guide our actions. For those working in inclusive education, recognizing and analyzing these metaphorical frameworks is crucial because they may subtly influence how we conceptualize challenges, develop solutions, and implement policies.

Various metaphorical frames emerged through the discussions, including BUILDING (emphasizing collaborative construction), ECONOMY (focusing on investment and costs), WAR (highlighting challenges), and SPORTS (illustrating fairness issues). On the whole, however, the JOURNEY metaphor dominated across all discourse types, consistently appearing in various forms when discussing policy implementation, educational progress, and/or change towards more inclusive and equitable education. Conference delegates thus triggered a rich image schema involving multifaceted networks of related images and concepts, which are unpacked and examined in the paper.

References

Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Forceville, C. (2021). The Journey as central concept to structure goal-oriented activity. Paper presented at the 14th conference for the Association for Researching and Applying Metaphor (RaAM14), Vilnius University, Lithuania (virtual). https://www.raam.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/2021-Vilnius-plenary-speakers.pdf

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Lindstromberg, S. (2010). English Prepositions Explained (revised ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Nacey, S. (2024). The Norwegian dugnad in times of COVID-19. Metaphor and Symbol, 39(2), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2024.2305203

Nacey, S. (2022). Systematic metaphors in Norwegian doctoral dissertation acknowledgements. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 67(5), 679-694. doi:10.1080/00313831.2022.2042847

Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thibodeau, P. H., Hendricks, R. K., & Boroditsky, L. (2017). How linguistic metaphor scaffolds reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Science, 21(11), 852–863. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.07.001

Downloads

Published

2025-05-04

Issue

Section

Research Notes