Decolonizing inclusive education: Potential contributions of participatory research, postcolonial thinking and Ubuntu worldview
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/ejie.v4i3.149367Keywords:
Inclusive Education, Disability, Postcolonial, Participatory ResearchAbstract
PURPOSE: This article examines how knowledge production creates and maintains colonial dominance and unequal power relations between the Global North and the Global South, with a focus on the context of international inclusive education. It questions how participatory research approaches can methodologically manage these power relations in international practice settings. Dominant Eurocentric scholarship and knowledge have created processes of Othering to justify the supposed superiority of knowledge and practices from the Global North and the assumed inferiority of knowledge from the South. Thus, it is important to understand how the production of knowledge, in the colonial past and contemporary neocolonial world, is shaped by power dynamics and relations. Inclusive education can play a significant role to help these colonial dynamics and their impact on practices that affect marginalized social groups. These power imbalances influence intercultural and international research projects, especially in the field of inclusion and disability. Despite extensive knowledge about disability in the Global South, Eurocentric and Western knowledge production is largely dominated by the Global North.
METHOD: The article offers a dialogue on the extent to which participatory research can methodologically help manage these power relations in international comparative research on disability and inclusion. The paper also discusses limitations and challenges faced by inclusive education researchers navigating global power dynamics and realities. The paper offer recommendations on how to decolonize inclusive education research informed participatory research informed by postcolonial thinking and Ubuntu World views.
RESULTS: The theoretical dialogue shows that participatory research, with its ontological and epistemological foundations, is able to decolonize research in the international research context on disability.
CONCLUSION: The conclusion of this work is that a foundation of postcolonial theories, participatory research and disability/inclusive education provides a solid ground for initiating a paradigm shift.
References
Abdulrahman, H., Adebisi, F., Nwako, Z., & Walton, E. (2021). Revisiting (inclusive) education in the postcolony. Journal of the British Academy, 9s1, 47–75. https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/009s1.04
Afeworki Abay, R. (2023). Dekolonialisierung des Wissens (Vol. 85). transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839470534
Armstrong, F. (2019). Social Constructivism and Action Research: Transforming teaching and learning trough collaborative practice. In F. Armstrong (Ed.), Action Research for Inclusive Education: Participation and Democracy in Teaching and Learning (pp. 5–16). Routledge.
Armstrong, F. (Ed.). (2019). Action Research for Inclusive Education: Participation and Democracy in Teaching and Learning. Routledge.
Bannink Mbazzi, F., Nalugya, R., Kawesa, E., Nambejja, H., Nizeyimana, P., Ojok, P., van Hove, G., & Seeley, J. (2020). ‘Obuntu Bulamu’ – Development and Testing of an Indigenous Intervention for Disability Inclusion in Uganda. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 22(1), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.697
Barker, C., & Murray, S. (2013). Disabling Postcolonialism: Global Disability Cultures and Democratic Criticism. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (4. ed., pp. 59–73). Routledge.
Bergold, J., & Thomas, S. (2012). Participatory Reserach Methods a methodological approach in Motion. Forum Qualitative Research, 13(1).
Bhatia, S. (2014). Orientalism. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology (pp. 1294–1300). Springer New York.
Chataika, T. (2012). Disability, Development and Postcolonialism. In D. Goodley, B. Hughes, & L. J. Davis (Eds.), Disability and social theory: New developments and directions (1. publ). Palgrave Macmillan.
Chigangaidze, R. (2022). Utilising Ubuntu in social work practice: Ubuntu in the eyes of the multimodal approach. Journal of Social Work Practice, 36(3), 291 - 301. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2021.1981276
Chilisa, B. (2012). Indigenous research methodologies. SAGE.
Davis, L. J. (Ed.). (2013). The disability studies reader (4. ed.). Routledge.
El-Lahib, Y. (2017). Theoretical Dimensions for interrogating the intersection of disability, immigration and social work. International Social Work, 60(3).
El-Lahib, Y. (2020). Social work at the intersection of disability and displacement: Rethinking our role. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 31(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428232.2018.1531744
Gaylard, R. (2004). “Welcome to the world of our humanity”: (African) humanism, ubuntu and black South African writing. Journal of Literary Studies, 20(3-4), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/02564710408530357
Ghai, A. (2012). Engaging with Disability with Postcolonial Theory. In D. Goodley, B. Hughes, & L. J. Davis (Eds.), Disability and social theory: New developments and directions (1. publ, pp. 270–286). Palgrave Macmillan.
Goodley, D., & Swartz, L. (2016). The Place of Disability. In S. Grech & K. Soldatic (Eds.), International Perspectives on Social Policy, Administration, and Practice. Disability in the Global South: The Critical Handbook (1st ed. 2016, pp. 69–83). Springer International Publishing; Imprint: Springer.
Goodley, D., Hughes, B., & Davis, L. J. (Eds.). (2012). Disability and social theory: New developments and directions (1. publ). Palgrave Macmillan.
Grace, J., Nind, M., Haas, C. de, & Hope, J. (2024). Expanding Possibilities for Inclusive Research: Learning from People with Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities and Decolonising Research. Social Sciences, 13(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13010037
Grech, S. (2011). Recolonising debates or perpetuated coloniality? Decentring the spaces of disability, development an. International Journal of Inclusice Education, 15(1).
Grech, S. (2012). Disability and the Majority World: A Neocolonial Approach. In D. Goodley, B. Hughes, & L. J. Davis (Eds.), Disability and social theory: New developments and directions (1. publ). Palgrave Macmillan.
Grech, S., & Soldatic, K. (Eds.). (2016). International Perspectives on Social Policy, Administration, and Practice. Disability in the Global South: The Critical Handbook (1st ed. 2016). Springer International Publishing; Imprint: Springer.
Hailey, J. (2008). Ubuntu: A Literature Review: A Paper Prepared for the Tutu Foundation.
Hostettler, K. (2020). Kritik - Selbstaffirmation - Othering - Immanuel Kants Denken der Zweckmässigkeit und die koloniale Episteme // Kritik - Selbstaffirmation - Othering: Immanuel Kants Denken der Zweckmässigkeit und die koloniale Episteme. Edition Moderne Postmoderne. transcript.
Kowalski, A. M. (2020). Global South-Global North Differences. In W. Leal Filho, A. M. Azul, L. Brandli, A. Lange Salvia, P. G. Özuyar, & T. Wall (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. No Poverty (pp. 1–12). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69625-6_68-1
Leal Filho, W., Azul, A. M., Brandli, L., Lange Salvia, A., Özuyar, P. G., & Wall, T. (Eds.). (2020). Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. No Poverty. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69625-6
Maihofer, A. (2013). Nachwort: Hegemoniale Selbstaffirmierung und Veranderung. In S. Vögele & K. Hostettler (Eds.), Postcolonial Studies: Vol. 15. Diesseits der imperialen Geschlechterordnung: (Post-)koloniale Reflexionen über den Westen (pp. 319–332). transcript.
Martinez-Vargas, C. (2022). Democratising Participatory Research: Pathways to Social Justice from the Global South. Open Book Publishers.
McEwan, C. (2019). Postcolonialism, Decoloniality and Development (2nd ed.). Routledge Perspectives on Development Ser. Routledge.
Meekosha, H. (2011). Decolonising disability: thinking and acting globally. Disability & Society, 26(6), 667–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2011.602860
Meekosha, H., & Shuttleworth, R. (2009). What's so ‘critical’ about critical disability studies? Australian Journal of Human Rights, 15(1), 47–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238X.2009.11910861
Mignolo, W. (2012). Mariátegui and Gramsci in »Latin« America: Between revolution and decoloniality. In N. F. R. Srivastava & B. Bhattacharya (Eds.), Routledge research in postcolonial literatures: Vol. 36. The postcolonial Gramsci (pp. 191–218). Routledge.
Montez de Oca, J. (2012). White Domestic Goddess on a Postmodern Plantation: Charity and Commodity Racism in The Blind Side. Sociology of Sport Journal, 29(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.29.2.131
Mpofu, J. & Sefotho, M., M. (2024). The relationship between the philosophy of Ubuntu and the principles of inclusive education. Perspective in Education, 42(2), 128-144. https://doi.org/10.38140/pie.v42i2.7338 Mugumbate, J. & Nyanguru, A. (2013). Exploring African philosophy: The value of ubuntu in social work. African Journal of Social Work, 3 (1), 82-100
Mutanga, O. (2024). Ubuntu philosophy and disabilities in Sub-Saharan Africa: Successes, promises, and challenges for inclusive development. In O. Mutanga (Ed.), Interdisciplinary disability studies. Ubuntu philosophy and disabilities in Sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 1–17). Routledge.
Mutanga, O. (Ed.). (2024). Interdisciplinary disability studies. Ubuntu philosophy and disabilities in Sub-Saharan Africa. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003343684
Ndlovu, S. (2024). Re-writing the Disability Script from the Global South: Tsitsi Chataika’s Contribution to Disability Studies Scholarship in Africa. The Thinker, 99(2), 64–74.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2019). Provisional Notes on Decolonizing Research Methodology and Undoing Its Dirty History. Journal of Developing Societies, 35(4), 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X19880417
Nind, M. (2014). Inclusive research and inclusive education: why connecting them makes sense for teachers’ and learners’ democratic development of education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 44(4), 525–540.
Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Views from South, 1(3), 533–580.
Razack, N. (2009). Decolonizing the pedagogy and practice of international social work. International Social Work, 52(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872808097748
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008a). Introduction. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The Sage handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2. ed., pp. 1–10). SAGE.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2008b). The Sage handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2. ed.). SAGE.
Rizvi, S. (2021). Undoing whiteness in disability studies: The special education system and British South Asian mothers. Palgrave Macmillan.
Rósa, B. (2020). At the intersection of development, disability and postcolonial theory: Are people with a disability marginalised among the marginalised? Andragogical Yearbook [Online], 26.
Said, E. W. ([1978] 2019). Orientalism (Reissued in Penguin Classics). Modern classics. Penguin Books.
Singal, N. (2010). Doing disability research in a Southern context: challenges and possibilities. Disability & Society, 25(4), 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687591003755807
Siouti, I. (2022). Othering in der qualitativen Migrationsforschung: Herausforderungen und Reflexionen in der Forschungspraxis. In I. Siouti, T. Spies, E. Tuider, H. von Unger, & E. Yildiz (Eds.), Postmigrantische Studien: Band 12. Othering in der postmigrantischen Gesellschaft - Herausforderungen und Konsequenzen für die Forschungspraxis // Othering in der postmigrantischen Gesellschaft (107-128). transcript.
Siouti, I., Spies, T., Tuider, E [Elisabeth], Unger, H. von, & Yıldız, E. (2022). Methodologischer Eurozentrismus und das Konzept des Othering: Ein Einleitung. In I. Siouti, T. Spies, E. Tuider, H. von Unger, & E. Yildiz (Eds.), Postmigrantische Studien: Band 12. Othering in der postmigrantischen Gesellschaft - Herausforderungen und Konsequenzen für die Forschungspraxis // Othering in der postmigrantischen Gesellschaft (pp. 7–30). transcript.
Siouti, I., Spies, T., Tuider, E [Elisabetz], Unger, H. von, & Yildiz, E. (Eds.). (2022). Postmigrantische Studien: Band 12. Othering in der postmigrantischen Gesellschaft - Herausforderungen und Konsequenzen für die Forschungspraxis // Othering in der postmigrantischen Gesellschaft. transcript.
Srivastava, N. F. R., & Bhattacharya, B. (Eds.). (2012). Routledge research in postcolonial literatures: Vol. 36. The postcolonial Gramsci. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203128916
Teo, T. (Ed.). (2014). Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7
Tremain, S. (2015). This Is What a Historicist and Relativist Feminist Philosophy of Disability Looks Like Foucault Studies(19), 7–42.
Van Breda, A. (2019). Developing the notion of ubuntu as African theory for social work practice. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 55(4), 439. https://doi.org/10.15270/55-4-762
Veck, W., & Hall, M. (2020). Inclusive research in education: dialogue, relations and methods. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(10), 1081–1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1512659
Vögele, S., & Hostettler, K. (Eds.). (2013). Postcolonial Studies: Vol. 15. Diesseits der imperialen Geschlechterordnung: (Post-)koloniale Reflexionen über den Westen. transcript. https://doi.org/10.14361/transcript.9783839423431
Waldschmidt, A. (2015). Disability Goes Cultural: The Cultural Model of Disability as an Analytical Tool. In A. Waldschmidt, H. Berressem, & M. Ingwersen (Eds.), Disability Studies body - power - difference: volume 10. Culture - theory - disability: Encounters between disability studies and cultural studies (pp. 19–27). transcript.
Waldschmidt, A., Berressem, H., & Ingwersen, M. (Eds.). (2015). Disability Studies body - power - difference: volume 10. Culture - theory - disability: Encounters between disability studies and cultural studies. transcript.
Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior : The Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 24(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309
Wilde, A., & Fish, R. (2025). Gender, feminism and the project of critical disability studies (CDS). Disability & Society, 40(3), 533–554.
Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood Publishing.
Wood, L. (2020). Participatory action learning and action research: Theory, practice and process (1st ed.). Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Victoria Mehringer, Yahya El-Lahib
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License (full legal code).
