RTO firm effects - A review of academic literature on firm effects of interactions with Research and Technology Organizations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/cfasr.v12i1.152978Keywords:
Research and technology organisations, Policy evaluation, Financial impactAbstract
The present literature review brings together the latest research-based evidence and knowledge in the international research literature in the field on how RTOs' technological service advice and infrastructure affect firms’ financial performance, how they contribute to firms’ innovation processes and innovation capacity, and their significance to firms’ subsequent collaboration with knowledge institutions and others. The focus is primarily on GTS-like RTOs to increase the applicability of the review in a Danish context, including giving the Danish Agency for Higher Education and Science (UFS) a knowledge base on RTOs’ significance for Danish firms.
References
Autor, D., Dorn, D., Katz, L. F., Patterson, C., & Van Reenen, J. (2020). The fall of the labor share and the rise of superstar firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(2), 645-709. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjaa004
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 128-152. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
Escribano, A., Fosfuri, A., & Tribó, J. A. (2009). Managing external knowledge flows: The mod erating role of absorptive capacity. Research policy, 38(1), 96-105. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.022
Guerrero D. F. (2020). Bridging the Gap between Firms and Universities Firm Links with Re search and Technology Organisations in Different Types of Regions. Working Paper. doi; https://doi.org/10.3990/4.2535-5686.2020.03
Karolinska Institutet (2020). Systematic Reviews. Karolinska Institutet, University Library. Retrieved from https://kib.ki.se/en/search-evaluate/systematic-reviews
Knockaert, M., & Spithoven, A. (2009). When do Firms Technology Intermediary Interactions Result in Cognitive Capacity Additionality? Proceedings of ECEI 2009: the 4th European Conference on Entrepreneurship and Innovation. p.245-253 http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-770448
Kongsted (2018). Review af viden om økonomiske effekter af virkemidler til fremme af privat FoU. Retrieved from https://ufm.dk/publikationer/2018/review-af-viden-om-okonomiske-effekter-af-virkemidler-til-fremme-af-privat-fou
Moilanen M., Østbye S., Woll K. (2014). Small Bus Econ 43:447-462. doi; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9545-9
Som O., Kirner E., Jäger A. (2015) Non-R&D-Intensive Firms' Innovation Sourcing. In: Som O., Kirner E. (eds) Low-tech Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09973-6_8
Stegenga, J. (2014). Down with the hierarchies. Topoi, 33(2), 313-322. doi: 10.1007/s11245-013-9189-4.
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of management review, 27(2), 185-203. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995
Albors-Garrigós, J., Zabaleta, N., & Ganzarain, J. (2010). New R&D management paradigms: rethinking research and technology organizations strategies in regions. R & D Management, 40(5), 435-454. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00611.x
Arnold, E., Brown, N., Eriksson, A., Jansson, T., Muscio, A., Nählinder, J. & Zaman, R. (2007). VIN-NOVA Report: The Role of Industrial Research Institutes in the National Innovation System. VINNOVA. Retrieved from https://www.vinnova.se/contentassets/f954000a6ffb41b2a5116c25d3bc54d9/va-07-12.pdf
Arnold, E., Clark, J. & Jávorka, Z. (2010). Impacts of European RTOs - A Study of Social and Economic Impacts of Research and Technology Organisations - A Report to EARTO. EARTO. Retrieved from https://www.earto.eu/wp-content/uploads/TechnopolisRepor-tImpactRTOsOctober2010.pdf
Barge-Gil, A., & Modrego, A. (2011). The impact of research and technology organizations on firm competitiveness. Measurement and determinants. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(1), 61-83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9132-4
Barge-Gil, A., Santamaría, L., & Modrego, A. (2011). Complementarities between universities and technology institutes: New empirical lessons and perspectives. European Planning Studies, 19(2), 195-215. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.532665
Batterink, M. H., Wubben, E. F. M., Klerkx, L., & Omta, S. W. F. (2010). Orchestrating innovation networks: The case of innovation brokers in the agri-food sector. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(1), 47-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620903220512
Cantù, C., Ylimäki, J., Sirén, C. A., & Nickell, D. (2015). The role of knowledge intermediaries in co-managed innovations. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 30(8), 951-961. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-02-2014-0032
Clayton, P., Feldman, M., & Lowe, N. (2018). BEHIND THE SCENES: INTERMEDIARY ORGANIZATIONS THAT FACILITATE SCIENCE COMMERCIALIZATION THROUGH ENTREPRENEURSHIP. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 104-124. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2016.0133
Colombo, G., Dell'Era, C., & Frattini, F. (2014). Exploring the contribution of innovation inter-mediaries to the new product development (NPD) process: a typology and an empirical study. R&D Management, 45(2), 126-146. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12056
Comin, D., Licht, G., Pellens, M., & Schubert, T. (2019). Do companies benefit from public re-search organizations? The impact of the Fraunhofer Society in Germany. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3354365 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3354365
Department for Business Innovation and Skills, UK. (2015). Research and Innovation Organi-sations in the UK: Innovation Functions and Policy Issues. Retrieved from https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/23161/1/bis-15-321-research-and-innovation-organisations-in-the-UK-innovation-functions-and-policy-issues.pdf
Dicecca, R., Pascucci, S., & Contò, F. (2016). Understanding reconfiguration pathways of agri-food value chains for smallholder farmers. British Food Journal, 118(8), 1857-1882. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-05-2016-0194
Dietsch, D., & Khemiri, R. (2018). Impact of the use of knowledge obtained through informal exchanges on the performance of innovation projects: For the enrichment of inbound open innovation practices. International Journal of Innovation Management, 22(6). doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919618500457
Dornbusch, F., Lehmann, H., Pohle, A. & Radic, M. (2018). The Significance of the Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft for the German SMEs with which it Cooperates. Fraunhofer Society. Retrieved from https://www.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/zv/en/research/Range_of_Ser-vices/Fraunhofer-IMW-Impact-Study-Summary.pdf
Fernández-Esquinas, M., Merchán-Hernández, C., & Valmaseda-Andía, O. (2016). How effective are interface organizations in the promotion of university-industry links? Evidence from a regional innovation system. European Journal of Innovation Management, 19(3), 424-442. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2013-0068
Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsen, DAMVAD & Center for Forskningsanalyse (2010). Produktivitetseffekter af erhvervslivets forskning, udvikling og innovation. Retrieved from https://ufm.dk/publikationer/2010/filer-2010/produktivitetseffekter-2010.pdf
Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsen & Oxford Research A/S (2010). Brugerundersøgelse af GTS-institutterne 2010. Retrieved from https://ufm.dk/filer/publikationer/2010/Brugerun-dersoegelse_af_gtsnettet_2010/index.htm
Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsen (2009). A Step Beyond: International Evaluation of the GTS Institute System in Denmark. Retrieved from https://gts-net.dk/wp-content/uplo-ads/2014/04/AStepBeyond_web_1.pdf
Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsen (2011). Økonomiske effekter af erhvervslivets forsknings-samarbejde med offentlige videninstitutioner. Retrieved from https://ufm.dk/publikationer/2011/filer-2011/effekt-af-fou_samspil_print_enkeltsider_.pdf
Frietsch, R., Lutz, J., Neuhäusler P., Schubert, T., Lerch, C., Bethke, N., Rothengatter, O. (2018). Contribution to the German Innovation System - Fraunhofer Gesellschaft. Fraunhofer Soci-ety. Retrieved from https://www.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/zv/en/re-search/Range_of_Services/Fraunhofer-ISI-Impact-Study-Summary.pdf
Fudickar, R., & Hottenrott, H. (2019). Public research and the innovation performance of new technology based firms. Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(2), 326-358. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9695-z
Fukugawa, N. (2016). Knowledge creation and dissemination by Kosetsushi in sectoral innovation systems: insights from patent data. Scientometrics, 109(3), 2303-2327. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2124-x
Fukugawa, N. (2018a). Division of Labor between Innovation Intermediaries for SMEs: Productivity Effects of Interfirm Organizations in Japan. Journal of Small Business Management, 56, 297-322. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12345
Fukugawa, N. (2018b). Is the impact of incubator's ability on incubation performance contingent on technologies and life cycle stages of startups?: evidence from Japan. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(2), 457-478. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0468-1
Fukugawa, N. (2019). Determinants and impacts of public agricultural research: product-level evidence from agricultural Kohsetsushi in Japan. Scientometrics, 120(3), 1475-1498. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03158-0
Garengo, P. (2019). How bridging organisations manage technology transfer in SMEs: an empirical investigation. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 31(4), 477-491. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1520976
Gassmann, O., Daiber, M., & Enkel, E. (2011). The role of intermediaries in cross‐industry innovation processes. R&D Management, 41(5), 457-469. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00651.x
Giannopoulou, E., Barlatier, P. J., & Pénin, J. (2019). Same but different? Research and technology organizations, universities and the innovation activities of firms. Research Policy, 48(1), 223-233. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.008
Goduscheit, R. C., & Knudsen, M. P. (2015). How Barriers to Collaboration Prevent Progress in Demand for Knowledge: A Dyadic Study of Small and Medium-Sized Firms, Research and Technology Organizations and Universities. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(1), 29-54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12101
GTS-foreningen. (2020). GTS-institutternes performanceregnskab 2020: Banebrydende teknologi til dansk erhvervsliv. Retrieved from https://gts-net.dk/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Beretning-final-02.06.pdf
Guo, J. J., & Guo, B. (2013). How do innovation intermediaries facilitate knowledge spillovers within industrial clusters? A knowledge-processing perspective. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 21, 31-49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2013.819245
Iris Group. (2016). Analyse af GTS-nettets teknologiske ydelser set fra et brugerperspektiv. Retrieved from https://irisgroup.dk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Analyse-af-GTS-nettets-teknologiske-ydelser-set-fra-et-brugerperspektiv.pdf
Kaiser, U., & Kuhn, J. M. (2012). Long-run effects of public-private research joint ventures: The case of the Danish Innovation Consortia support scheme. Research Policy, 41(5), 913-927. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.009
Kanda, W., Hjelm, O., Clausen, J., & Bienkowska, D. (2018). Roles of intermediaries in supporting eco-innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 1006-1016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.132
Kanda, W., Río, P. D., Hjelm, O., & Bienkowska, D. (2019). A technological innovation systems approach to analyse the roles of intermediaries in eco-innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 227, 1136-1148. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.230
Kivimaa, P. (2014). Government-affiliated intermediary organisations as actors in system-level transitions. Research Policy, 43(8), 1370-1380. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.007
Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2009). Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: Insights from the Dutch agricultural sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6), 849-860. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.001
Klewitz, J., Zeyen, A., & Hansen, E. G. (2012). Intermediaries driving eco-innovation in SMEs: A qualitative investigation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(4), 442-467. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061211272376
Knockaert, M., & Spithoven, A. (2014). Under Which Conditions Do Technology Intermediaries Enhance Firms' Innovation Speed? The Case of Belgium's Collective Research Centres. Regional Studies, 48(8), 1391-1403. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.708405
Knockaert, M., Spithoven, A., & Clarysse, B. (2014). The impact of technology intermediaries on firm cognitive capacity additionality. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 81, 376-387. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.007
Landry, R., Amara, N., Cloutier, J. S., & Halilem, N. (2013). Technology transfer organizations: Services and business models. Technovation, 33(12), 431-449. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.09.008
Lasagni, A. (2012). How Can External Relationships Enhance Innovation in SMEs? New Evidence for Europe*. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 310-339. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00355.x
Lin, H., Zeng, S. X., Liu, H. J., & Li, C. (2016). How do intermediaries drive corporate innovation? A moderated mediating examination. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4831-4836. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.039
Lin, H., Zeng, S. X., Liu, H. J., & Li, C. (2020). Bridging the gaps or fecklessness? A moderated mediating examination of intermediaries' effects on corporate innovation. Technovation, 94-95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.006
Lin, M., & Wei, J. (2018). The impact of innovation intermediary on knowledge transfer. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 502, 21-28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.02.207
Loikkanen, T., Rilla, N., Deschryvere, M. & Lehenkari, J. (2013). Roles, effectiveness, and im-pact of VTT: Towards broad-based impact monitoring of a research and technology or-ganisation. VTT. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260748407_Roles_effectiveness_and_impact_of_VTT_Towards_broad-based_impact_monitoring_of_a_research_and_technology_organisation
Malik, K. (2012). Use of knowledge brokering services in the innovation process. In 2012 IEEE 6th International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, ICMIT 2012IEEE Int. Conf. Manage. Innov. Technol., ICMIT (pp. 273-278) doi: 10.1109/ICMIT.2012.6225817
Martínez-Vela, C. (2017). Benchmarking Research and Technology Organizations (RTOs): A Comparative Analysis. MIT Industrial Performance Center. Retrieved from https://ipc.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2019-01/16-005.pdf
Matschoss, K., & Heiskanen, E. (2018). Innovation intermediary challenging the energy incumbent: enactment of local socio-technical transition pathways by destabilisation of regime rules. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 30(12), 1455-1469. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1473853
Mei, L., Zhang, T., & Chen, J. (2019). Exploring the effects of inter-firm linkages on SMEs' open innovation from an ecosystem perspective: An empirical study of Chinese manufacturing SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 118-128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.010
Memon, A. B., & Meyer, K. (2017). Towards the functional roles of an innovation laboratory as a platform for innovation: An observational approach. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, 8(1), 32-49. Retrieved from https://www.igi-global.com/gateway/article/169750 https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSSMET.2017010103
Miller, S. (2014). The strathclyde technology and innovation centre (TIC) in Scotland's innovation system. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 1(1), 145-151. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2014.944208
Olmos-Peñuela, J., García-Granero, A., Castro-Martínez, E., & D'Este, P. (2017). Strengthening SMEs' innovation culture through collaborations with public research organizations. Do all firms benefit equally? European Planning Studies, 25(11), 2001-2020. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1279592
Parker, R., & Hine, D. (2014). The Role of Knowledge Intermediaries in Developing Firm Learning Capabilities. European Planning Studies, 22(5), 1048-1061. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.758688
Pesonen, P., Van Der Have, R., Saarinen, J., & Rilla, N. (2008) Dating or mating? On the relationship of SMEs with an RTO in Finland. VTT Technological Research Centre of Finland. Research Nores No. 2423 (pp. 3-36) https://www.vttresearch.com/sites/default/files/pdf/tiedotteet/2008/T2423.pdf
Rincón-Díaz, C. A., & Albors-Garrigós, J. (2013). Sustaining strategies in RTOs. A contingent model for understanding RTOs' perfomance. Direccion y Organizacion, 50, 74-84. Retrieved from https://revistadyo.es/DyO/index.php/dyo/article/view/433 https://doi.org/10.37610/dyo.v0i50.433
Rincón-Díaz, C. A., & Albors-Garrigós, J. (2017). Research and technology organizations' mobilizers of the regional environment: Competitive strategies. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 26(2), 180-198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-07-2017-011
Robin, S., & Schubert, T. (2013). Cooperation with public research institutions and success in innovation: Evidence from France and Germany. Research Policy, 42(1), 149-166. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.002
Roessl, D., Kessler, A., & Fink, M. (2010). The role of research and technology organizations in innovation processes of small and medium-sized enterprises. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 11(3), 199-207. doi: https://doi.org/10.5367/000000010792217290
Roxas, S. A., Pirolic, G., & Sorrentinod, M. (2011). Efficiency and evaluation analysis of a network of technology transfer brokers. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 23(1), 7-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2011.537085
Spithoven, A., Clarysse, B., & Knockaert, M. (2010). Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries. Technovation, 30(2), 130-141. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.004
Spithoven, A., & Knockaert, M. (2012). Technology intermediaries in low tech sectors: The case of collective research centres in belgium. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 14(3), 375-387. doi: https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2012.14.3.375
Styrelsen for Forskning og Uddannelse. (2017). Erhvervslivets investeringer i forskning og ud-vikling i Danmark 2017. Retrieved from https://ufm.dk/publikationer/2017/filer/erhvervslivets-investeringer-i-forskning-og-udvikling-2017.pdf
Tann, J., Platts, A. E., & Stein, J. (2002). The roles of independent research and technology organizations in the United Kingdom's technology transfer mechanism to SMEs. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 14(2), 241-249. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320220133893
Thurner, T. W., & Zaichenko, S. (2015). Knowledge inputs to science- and development-based regimes: Evidence from the Behaviour of Russian RTOs. International Journal of Innovation Management, 19(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919615500036
Tran, Y., Hsuan, J., & Mahnke, V. (2011). How do innovation intermediaries add value? Insight from new product development in fashion markets. R&D Management, 41(1), 80-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00628.x
Tremblay, D. G., & Dossou-Yovo, A. (2015). Territory, innovation processes in SMEs, and intermediary actors: the case of the ICT sector in the Greater Montreal Area. International Journal of Technology Management, 69(1), 1-19. Retrieved from http://www.inderscience.com/offer.php?id=71028 https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2015.071028
Vivas, C., & Barge-Gil, A. (2015). Impact on firms of the use of knowledge external sources: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(5), 943-964. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12089
VTT (2017). Impact of VTT 2017. Retrieved from https://www.vttresearch.com/sites/default/files/2020-02/VTT_Review_2017_Impact.pdf
Wu, J. B., & Xu, M. Z. (2013). Technology intermediaries and regional innovation performance: an empirical study in China. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 21, 7-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2013.819242
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 CFA Scientific Reports
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License terms apply for all publications unless specifically stated otherwise on the publication.
