Degree of Worry and unscheduled returns to the emergency department within 30 days: An observational study

Forfattere

  • Torbjørn Shields Thomsen Klinisk Forsknings afdeling, Hvidovre Hospital
  • Kira Mygind Klinisk Forskningsafdeling, Hvidovre Hospital, Kettegaard Allé, 2650 Hvidovre
  • Mikkel Brabrand Forskningsenhed for Akut medicin, Odense Universitets Hospital, Odense, Danmark
  • Thomas Kallemose Klinisk Forskningsafdeling, Hvidovre Hospital, Kettegaard Allé, 2650 Hvidovre
  • Hejdi Gamst-Jensen Klinisk Forskningsafdeling, Hvidovre Hospital, Kettegaard Allé, 2650 Hvidovre

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/akut.v7i2.138197

Resumé

Abstract (Dansk)

Baggrund: Ikke-planlagte genhenvendelser (IPG) til akutmodtagelser (AKM) er ofte anvendt som kvalitetsmarkør, men det er debatteret hvilke patientrelaterede variabler der kan forudsige disse. Dette studie har undersøgt om Degree of Worry (DOW), en ny patient reported outcome, er associeret til IPG ved ankomst til AKM.

Formål: At undersøge associationen mellem DOW ved ankomst til AKM og 30 dages IPG.

Metode: I et observationelt studie blev 1945 patienter screenet, hvoraf 845 samtykkede og blev inkluderet. Dataindsamlingen blev udført på Hvidovre Hospital, Region Hovedstaden. Eksklusionskriterier var manglende samtykke, <18 år, ikke-dansk talende, højeste triage niveau, fysisk eller mentalt hæmmede, påvirkning af alkohol eller euforiserende stoffer eller ortopædkirurgiske skader. Patienter blev bedt om at vurdere deres DOW ved ankomst til AKM og 30 dages followup up blev lavet via patienternes journaler. Det primære outcome var association mellem en høj DOW (7-10) og 30 dages IPG. Dette blev testet ved tre separate logistiske regressioner, 1) crude, 2) semi-justeret for triage niveau, køn, alder og kronisk sygdom, 3) justeret for self-rated health, triage niveau, køn, alder og kronisk sygdom.

Resultat: Associationen mellem IPG og DOW var 1) crude OR (odds ratio) 1.04 (95% CI: 0.74-1.46) for 30-day URV, 2) semi-justeret, OR 0.98 (95% CI: 0.68-1.41), and 3) justeret inklusiv SRH, OR 0.92 (95% CI: 0.63-1.33).

Konklusion: Vore analyser viste ingen signifikant association mellem DOW og 30 dages IPG, i alle tre analyser, hvilket kan skyldes timingen af DOW spørgsmålet, manglende power eller en reel manglende association.

 

Abstract (Engelsk)

Background: Unscheduled return visits (URVs) to emergency departments (EDs) are widely used as an indicator of quality of care. However, it is debated which patient related variables accurately predict URVs. This study aimed to investigate if Degree of Worry (DOW), a novel patient reported outcome, at arrival is associated with ED URVs. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between DOW and 30-day URV to the ED.

Aims: To investigate the association between a novel patient reported outcome measure at Emergency department (ED) arrival with 30-day Unscheduled Return Visits (URV).

Methods: An observational study, 1945 patients were screened. 845 were eligible for inclusion and provided informed consent. Setting was the ED at Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Capital Region of Denmark. Exclusion criteria were lack of consent, <18 years of age, non-Danish speaking, highest triage level, physically or mentally impairment, affected by drugs or alcohol, or orthopedic injuries. Patients were asked to rate their DOW on arrival to the ED and 30-day URV was determined by follow up in medical records. Primary outcome was the association between high DOW (DOW 7-10) and 30-day URV. This was tested with three logistic regression analyses, 1) crude, 2) semi-adjusted for triage level, sex, age, and chronic disease, 3) adjusted for self-rated health, triage level, sex, age, and chronic disease.

Results: The association between URV and DOW was 1) crude, OR (odds ratio) 1.04 (95% CI: 0.74-1.46) for 30-day URV, 2) semi-adjusted, OR 0.98 (95% CI: 0.68-1.41), and 3) fully adjusted including SRH, OR 0.92 (95% CI: 0.63-1.33).

Conclusion: Our analysis showed no significant association between DOW at ED-arrival and 30-day URV in all three analyses.

Forfatterbiografier

Torbjørn Shields Thomsen, Klinisk Forsknings afdeling, Hvidovre Hospital

Reservelæge

Kira Mygind, Klinisk Forskningsafdeling, Hvidovre Hospital, Kettegaard Allé, 2650 Hvidovre

KBU-Læge

Mikkel Brabrand, Forskningsenhed for Akut medicin, Odense Universitets Hospital, Odense, Danmark

MD, PhD

Thomas Kallemose, Klinisk Forskningsafdeling, Hvidovre Hospital, Kettegaard Allé, 2650 Hvidovre

MSc

Hejdi Gamst-Jensen, Klinisk Forskningsafdeling, Hvidovre Hospital, Kettegaard Allé, 2650 Hvidovre

PhD, MSc, Sygeplejerske

Referencer

References

Van Galen LS, Brabrand M, Cooksley T, et al. Patients’ and providers’ perceptions of the preventability of hospital readmission: A prospective, observational study in four European countries. BMJ Qual Saf 2017;26:958–69. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006645

Danske Regioner. Databasen for Akutte Hospitalskontakter. 2019;:1–56.https://www.sundhed.dk/content/cms/59/67559_dah-aarsrapport-2018-offentlig-version.pdf (accessed 2 Jan 2021).

Baer RB, Pasternack JS, Zwemer FL. Recently Discharged Inpatients as a Source of Emergency Department Overcrowding. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8:1091–4. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01121.x

Pham JC, Kirsch TD, Hill PM, et al. Seventy-two-hour returns may not be a good indicator of safety in the emergency department: A national study. Acad Emerg Med 2011;18:390–7. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01042.x

Van Walraven C, Dhalla IA, Bell C, et al. Derivation and validation of an index to predict early death or unplanned readmission after discharge from hospital to the community. Cmaj 2010;182:551–7. doi:10.1503/cmaj.091117

Donze JD, Williams M V., Robinson EJ, et al. International validity of the HOSPITAL score to predict 30-day potentially avoidable hospital readmissions. JAMA Intern Med 2016;176:496–502. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.8462

Donze J, Aujesky D, Williams D, et al. Potentially avoidable 30-day hospital readmissions in medical patients: Derivation and validation of a prediction model. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:632–8. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.3023

Weldring T, Smith SMS. Article Commentary: Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Heal Serv Insights 2013;6:HSI.S11093. doi:10.4137/HSI.S11093

Gamst-Jensen H, Huibers L, Pedersen K, et al. Self-rated worry in acute care telephone triage: a mixed-methods study. Br J Gen Pract 2018;68:e197–203. doi:10.3399/bjgp18X695021

Thilsted SL, Egerod I, Lippert FK, et al. Relation between illness representation and self-reported degree-of-worry in patients calling out-of-hours services: a mixed-methods study in Copenhagen, Denmark. BMJ Open 2018;8:e020401. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020401

Gamst-Jensen H, Frischknecht Christensen E, Lippert F, et al. Self-rated worry is associated with hospital admission in out-of-hours telephone triage – a prospective cohort study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2020;28:53. doi:10.1186/s13049-020-00743-8

Bijur PE, Latimer CT, Gallagher EJ. Validation of a verbally administered numerical rating scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2003;10:390–2. doi:10.1197/aemj.10.4.390

Region Hovedstaden. Hospitals- og Psykiatriplan 2020. 2011;:1–93.https://www.hvidovrehospital.dk/nyt-hospital-hvidovre/Documents/Hospitalsplan 2020.pdf (accessed 3 Jan 2021).

Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019;95:103208. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208

Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, et al. The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire. J Psychosom Res 2006;60:631–7. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.10.020

Rising KL, Victor TW, Hollander JE, et al. Patient Returns to the Emergency Department: The Time-to-return Curve. Acad Emerg Med 2014;21:864–71. doi:10.1111/acem.12442

Trivedy CR, Cooke MW. Unscheduled return visits (URV) in adults to the emergency department (ED): a rapid evidence assessment policy review. Emerg Med J 2015;32:324–9. doi:10.1136/emermed-2013-202719

Idler E, Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav 1997;38:21–37.

Hvordan har du det? Syddanks Universitet, Statens Institut for Folkesundhed. 2010.https://www.sdu.dk/sif/-/media/images/sif/projekter/projekter_dokumenter/susy/susy_2010_selvadministreret_spoergeskema.pdf (accessed 3 Jan 2021).

Hayward J, Hagtvedt R, Ma W, et al. Predictors of Admission in Adult Unscheduled Return Visits to the Emergency Department. West J Emerg Med 2018;19:912–8. doi:10.5811/westjem.2018.38225

Carpenter CR, Shelton E, Fowler S, et al. Risk Factors and Screening Instruments to Predict Adverse Outcomes for Undifferentiated Older Emergency Department Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med 2015;22:1–21. doi:10.1111/acem.12569

Wu C-L, Wang F-T, Chiang Y-C, et al. Unplanned Emergency Department Revisits within 72 Hours to a Secondary Teaching Referral Hospital in Taiwan. J Emerg Med 2010;38:512–7. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.03.039

(2021)., R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna A. No Title. https://www.r-project.org/

Kraaijvanger N, Van Leeuwen H, Rijpsma D, et al. Motives for self-referral to the emergency department: A systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res 2016;16:1–19. doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1935-z

Jylhä M. What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model. Soc Sci Med 2009;69:307–16. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.013

Christensen AI, Ekholm O, Gray L, et al. What is wrong with non-respondents? Alcohol-, drug- and smoking-related mortality and morbidity in a 12-year follow-up study of respondents and non-respondents in the Danish Health and Morbidity Survey. Addiction 2015;110:1507–14. doi:10.1111/add.12939

Hutchinson CL, McCloughen A, Curtis K. Incidence, characteristics and outcomes of patients that return to Emergency Departments. An integrative review. Australas. Emerg. Care. 2019;22:47–68. doi:10.1016/j.auec.2018.12.003

Altman DG, Royston P. The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. BMJ 2006;332:1080.1. doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1080

Bangdiwala SI. Dichotomising dangers. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot 2014;21:298–300. doi:10.1080/17457300.2014.940771

Kukull WA, Ganguli M. Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology 2012;78:1886–91. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812

Downloads

Publiceret

30-06-2024

Citation/Eksport

Thomsen, T., Mygind, K., Brabrand, M., Kallemose, T., & Gamst-Jensen, H. (2024). Degree of Worry and unscheduled returns to the emergency department within 30 days: An observational study. Dansk Tidsskrift for Akutmedicin, 7(2), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.7146/akut.v7i2.138197

Nummer

Sektion

Original-, udviklings- og kvalitetsartikler