A figurine in the hand is worth two behind glass

Thinking through the materiality of Luristani imagery

Authors

  • Kristian Alex Larsen

Keywords:

Figurines, Materiality, Luristan

Abstract

Four brown-black hand-sized clay figurines from Kazabad, Iran call for attention because of their imagery, colour and surface and because they do not seem to have any close morphological parallels. As they were obtained from locals during an archaeological expedition in 1963-64, they are not associated with a stratigraphic context. However, by using the “New Materialist”approach“agential realism”of Karen Barad, alternative opportunities of interpretation come out. By following small details using all relevant senses, significant similarities and differences are revealed. Instead of letting a basic theory direct the analysis, Karen Barad advises to think through different connections and scales. This leads to narratives and possible relations, which can be tested as hypotheses. The analyses suggest that the design and handling of the figurines followed certain practices, and that they may connect to a Mesopotamian as well as an Indo-Iranian past. Agential realism gives justice to concrete findings rather than subsuming them under categories, and it allows the marvel of engaging with the past through tangible things.

 

Note from the editors:
We are currently working on retranslating the abstract to persian.

The paper will be reuploaded once it is ready.
Sorry for the inconvience.

References

Álvarez-Mon, Javier. 2010. The Arjān Tomb: At the Crossroads of the Elamite and the Persian Empires. Acta Iranica 49. Leuven: Peeters.

Álvarez-Mon, Javier. 2020. The Art of Elam ca. 4200–525 Bc. Routledge.

Bahrani, Zainab. 2003. The Graven Image: Representation in Babylonia and Assyria. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Barrelet, M. T. 1968. Figurines et reliefs en terre cuite de la Mésopotamie antique/1 Potiers, termes de métier, procédés de fabrication et production. Figurines et reliefs en terre cuite de la Mésopotamie antique, 85.

Bailey, Doug. 2005. Prehistoric Figurines: Representation and Corporeality in the Neolithic. London ; New York: Routledge.

Bailey, Doug. 2014. ‘Touch and the Cheirotic Apprehension of Prehistoric Figurines’. Sculpture and Touch, 27–43.

Barad, Karen Michelle. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.

Curtis, John. 1984. Nush'i Jan III: the small finds. vii, 71 pp., 23 figs., 14 plates. London: British Institute of Persian Studies, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 49(3), 587-588.

Emberling, Geoff . http://teachmiddleeast.lib.uchicago.edu/historical-perspectives/the-question-of-identity/before-islam-overview/image-resource-bank/image-02.html Visited: 24/2-2023

Forouzan, F., Glover, J. B., Williams, F., & Deocampo, D. 2012. Portable XRF analysis of zoomorphic figurines,“tokens,” and sling bullets from Chogha Gavaneh, Iran, in Journal of Archaeological Science, 39(12), 3534-3541.

Ghirshman, R. 1958. Notes Iraniennes VIII. Le Dieu Zurvan sur les Bronzes du Luristan in Artibus Asiae, 21(1), 37-42.

Hakemi, A. 1993. Some statues discovered in the excavations at Shahdad. In Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae. Series B, Vol. 271, 217-224.

Hamilakis, Yannis. 2017. ‘Sensorial Assemblages: Affect, Memory and Temporality in Assemblage Thinking’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 27 (1): 169–82.

Hodder, Ian. 2003. ‘Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology.’ Cambridge University Press 53 (4).

Ingold, Tim. 2002. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. Routledge.

Ingold, Tim. 2012. ‘Toward an Ecology of Materials’. Annual Review of Anthropology 41 (1): 427–42.

Jones, Andrew M., and Marta Díaz-Guardamino. 2018. ‘“Enigmatic Images from Remote Prehistory”: Rock Art and Ontology from a European Perspective.’ The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology and Anthropology of Rock Art, 481–502.

Juelskjaer, Malou. 2012. ‘Intra-Active Entanglements: An Interview with Karen Barad’. Women, Gender and Research 21 (June): 10–23.

de Jong, Albert. 2000. ‘Zurvan – Encyclopaedia Iranica’. 2000. https://iranicaonline.org/articles/zurvan-deity

Langin-Hooper, S. 2014. Figuring Out the Figurines of the Ancient Near East (Vol. 1). Lulu.com.

Larsen, Kristian Alex. 2022. Vivid images of Luristan. Master´'s Thesis. University of Copenhagen.

Malekzadeh, M., Hasanpour, A., & Hashemi, Z. 2018. Bronzes of Luristan in a Non-Funerary Context: Sangtarashan, an Iron Age Site in Luristan (Iran). Prehistoric and Historical landscapes & Settlement Patterns, 577-588.

Manfredda, Nicole, Paola Buscaglia, Paolo Gallo, Matilde Borla, Sara Aicardi, Giovanna Poggi, Piero Baglioni, Marco Nervo, Dominique

Scalarone, and Alessandro Borghi. 2021. ‘An Ancient Egyptian Multilayered Polychrome Wooden Sculpture Belonging to the Museo Egizio of Torino: Characterization of Painting Materials and Design of Cleaning Processes by Means of Highly Retentive Hydrogels’. Coatings 11 (11): 1335.

Matthews, R., & Nashli, H. F. 2022. The Archaeology of Iran from the Palaeolithic to the Achaemenid Empire. Taylor & Francis.

Mazaheri, Khodakeram. 2016. Examination of Painted Pottery Tradition of Godin III in the Holailan Valley Based on Discovered Findings from Kazabad A in Ilam Culture, Volume 17, Issue 50.51, September 2016.

Meskell, Lynn. 2017. The Archaeology of Figurines and the Human Body in Prehistory. Edited by Timothy Insoll. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press.

Mitchell, W. J. T. 2005. What Do Pictures Want? : The Lives and Loves of Images. Chicago, Ill., London: University of Chicago Press.

Mortensen, Peder. 2014. Excavations at Tepe Guran: The Neolithic Period. Acta Iranica 55. Leuven: Peeters.

Omidsalar, Mahmoud, and Teresa Omidsalalar. 2011. ‘DOG – Encyclopaedia Iranica’. 2011. https://iranicaonline.org/articles/dog#pt2.

Papadopoulos, Costas, Yannis Hamilakis, Nina Kyparissi-Apostolika, and Marta Díaz-Guardamino. 2019. ‘Digital Sensoriality: The Neolithic Figurines from Koutroulou Magoula, Greece’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 29 (4): 625–52.

Porada, Edith.1995. Man and Images in the Ancient Near East. Moyer Bell.

Schmidt, Erich Friedrich, Maurits N. van Loon, and Hans H. Curvers. 1989. The Holmes Expeditions to Luristan. The University of Chicago Oriental Institute Publications 108, plates.

Stein, Sir Aurel. 1940. Old Routes Of Western Iran

Talma, Marianne. 2018. ‘An Experimental Diachronic Exploration of Patination Methodology of Dark Patinated (Arsenical) Copper Alloys on Case Studies from the Eastern Mediterranean Bronze Age and Early Iron Age’. EXARC Journal, no. EXARC Journal Issue 2018/1.

Thrane, Henrik. 1964. ‘Archaeological investigations in Western Luristan. Preliminary Report of the 2nd Danish Archaeological Expedition to Iran’. In Acta Archaeologica 35, 153-169.

Thrane, H. 1970. Tepe Guran and the Luristan Bronzes. Archaeology, 23(1), 26-35.

Thrane, H. 1999. ‘Pots and peoples - once again. The goblets from the Bronze Age settlement at Tepe Guran, Luristan’. Iranica antiqua 34, 21–40.

Thrane, Henrik, Juliet Clutton-Brock, Verner Alexandersen, and Jørgen Balslev Jørgensen. 2001. Excavations at Tepe Guran in Luristan: The Bronze Age and Iron Age Period. Jutland Archaeological Society Publications 38. Aarhus.

Thrane, Henrik. 2015. ‘En Dal i Zagrosbjergene – En Dansk Ekspedition Til Luristan’. In Fortiden i Nutiden, Bodil Bundgaard Rasmussen, 95–112. Nationalmuseet.

Downloads

Published

17-05-2023

How to Cite

Larsen, K. A. (2023) “A figurine in the hand is worth two behind glass: Thinking through the materiality of Luristani imagery”, Chronolog, 1(1). Available at: https://tidsskrift.dk/Chronolog/article/view/138267 (Accessed: 1 May 2024).

Issue

Section

Articles