Provoking Situations?

Why Reenact “Student-Robot” Interaction, in L.A. or Anywhere

Authors

  • Philippe Sormani University of Lausanne
  • Audrey Hostettler CEMS-EHESS, Paris

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v6i1.137381

Keywords:

student-robot interaction, video reenactment, ethnomethodology

Abstract

This paper presents a practice-based video analysis of student-robot interaction in situ. In so doing, the paper explicates the double interest of provoking situations, both as a praxeological topic and pedagogical resource. Designed and developed as a hybrid study of instructional work, the paper combines video analysis and the practical reenactment of two contrasting episodes of student-robot interaction. This combined approach pursues two related aims. First, the paper explicates (some of) the “tutorial problems” (Garfinkel, 2002, chapter 4) resulting from the practical reenactment, problems that recast and complement the video analysis. In particular, the focal theme of situated agency in student-robot interaction will be revisited as an intricate phenomenon and pedagogical issue. Second, the paper offers a reflexive intervention in ethnomethodology/conversation analysis (EM/CA), insofar as it prospects a (relatively) new avenue for EM/CA research, both from within and contributing to its productive tensions. That is, the paper articulates the video reenactment of situated interaction as a heuristic strategy, while leveraging the (arguably) phenomenological difference between EM and CA on education as a methodological resource. The paper concludes with how and why the provocative impetus of science and technology studies (Woolgar, 2004) can, and perhaps should, be leveraged for prospective EM/CA studies more broadly, be it on their historically alluring home turf, Los Angeles, or anywhere else.

References

Anderson, R.J., Sharrock, W.W. (2013). The Gentle Seer: The Unappreciated Prescience of Egon Bittner’s ‘Objectivity and Realism in Sociology’. Ethnographic Studies. 13:18–29.

BBC (2022). Introduction to Computational Thinking. Bitesize: K3 Subjects. Accessed 1 Oct 2022, https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/zp92mp3/revision/1

Ben-Ari, M., Mondada, F. (2018). Elements of Robotics. Cham: Springer.

Bjelić, D. (1996). Lebenswelt Structures of Galilean Physics: The Case of Galileo’s Pendulum. Human Studies. 19, 409–432.

Bridle, J. (2017). Autonomous Trap 001. Artwork, Accessed 9 June 2023, https://jamesbridle.com/works/autonomous-trap-001

Broth, M., Laurier, E., Mondada, L. (Eds.), (2014). Studies of Video Practices. Video at Work. London & New York: Routledge.

Button, G., Lynch, M., Sharrock, W. (2022). Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis and Constructive Analysis. On Formal Structures of Practical Action. London & New York: Routledge.

Campa, A.J., Dixson, B., Blume, H., Toohey, G. (2023). Mayor Bass mediating ongoing LAUSD strike; schools to remain closed Thursday. Los Angeles Times 22 March 2023. Accessed 23 March 2023, https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-03-22/lausd-strike-unites-workers-demanding-raises-closes-schools

Chevalier, M., Giang, C., Piatti, A., Mondada,, F. (2020). Fostering computational thinking through educational robotics: a model for creative computational problem solving. International Journal of STEM Education. 39:1-18.

Cohen, I.B. (1960). The Birth of a New Physics. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

Daugbjerg, M., Syd Eisner, R., Timm Knudsen, B. (2014). Re-enacting the Past: Vivifying Heritage ‘Again’. Journal of Heritage Studies. 20(7–8):681–687.

Deppermann, A. (2013). Multimodal Analysis From a Conversation Analytic Perspective. Journal of Pragmatics. 46:1–7.

Dupré, S., Harris, A., Kursell, J., Lulof, P., Stols-Witlox, M. (Eds.), (2020). Reconstruction, Replication and Re-enactment in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Fors, H., Principe, L.M., Sibum, H.O. (2016). From the Library to the Laboratory and Back Again. Ambix. 63(2), 85–97.

Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working our Durkheim’s Aphorism. Edited and introduced by A.W. Rawls. Lanham: MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Garfinkel, H. (2021). Ethnomethodological Misreading of Aron Gurwitsch on the Phenomenal Field. Human Studies. 44(1):19–42.

Garfinkel, H. (2022). Harold Garfinkel: Studies of Work in the Sciences. Edited with an Introduction by M. Lynch. London & New York: Routledge.

Gluzman, Y. (2017). Analyzing the Analyst: An Experimental Data Video for Thinking Theatre and Cognitive Neuroscience Together. Performance Matters. 3(2):107–118.

Goldberg, R. (2011[1979]). Performance Art. From Futurism to the Present. 3rd Edition. London: Thames & Hudson.

Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32:1489–1522.

Greiffenhagen, C. (2012). Making Rounds: The Routine Work of the Teacher during Collaborative Learning with Computers. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 7, 11–42.

Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J. (2002). Analysing Interaction. Video, Ethnography, and Situated Conduct. In T. May (.), Qualitative Research in Action (pp. 99–121). London: Sage.

Heintz, B. (1993). Die Herrschaft der Regel. Zur Grundlagengeschichte des Computers. Frankfurt a.M. & New York: Campus.

Hester, S., Francis, D. (Eds.) (2000). Local Educational Order: Ethnomethodological Studies of Knowledge in Action. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Höltgen, S. (2016). Resume: Hands-On Retrocomputing. Bochum/Freiburg: Projekt Verlag.

Iberdrola (2023). Do you know how educational robots can help your children to develop? Innovation: Educational Robots. Bilbao: Iberdrola, Accessed 1 March 2023, https://www.iberdrola.com/innovation/educational-robots

Katila, J., Gan, Y., Goico, S., Goodwin, M.H. (2021). Researchers’ Participation Roles in Video-based Fieldwork: An Introduction to a Special Issue. Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality. 4(2), 1–11.

Lipp, B. (2022). Caring for Robots: How Care Comes to Matter in Human-Machine Interfacing. Social Studies of Sience. Online First, 1–26.

Livingston, E. (1986). The Ethnomethodological Foundations of Mathematics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Livingston, E. (2008). Ethnographies of Reason. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Lynch, M. (2022). Garfinkel’s Studies of Work. In D.W. Maynard, J. Heritage (Eds.), The Ethnomethodology Program. Legacies and Prospects (pp. 114–38). Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.

Lynch, M., Lindwall, O. (Eds.), (In press). Instructed and Instructive Actions. London & New York: Routledge.

Macbeth, D. (2003). Hugh Mehan’s Learning Lessons Reconsidered: On the Differences Between the Naturalistic and Critical Analysis of Classroom Discourse. American Educational Research Journal. 40(1), 239–280.

Macbeth, D. (2014). Studies of Work, Instructed Action, and the Promise of Granularity: A Commentary. Discourse Studies. 16(2), 295–308.

Macbeth, D. (2022). Some Notes on the Play of Basketball in its Circumstantial Detail. In H. Garfinkel, Harold Garfinkel: Studies of Work in the Sciences (Appendix 2, pp. 58–70). Edited with an Introduction by M. Lynch. London & New York: Routledge.

Maeder, C. (2020). The Problem of the Definition of Situation in Educational Ethnography. In C. Wieser, A. Pilch Ortega (Eds.), Ethnography in Higher Education (pp. 147–156). Wiesbaden: Springer.

Mäkitalo, Å. (2016). On the Notion of Agency in Studies of Interaction and Learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction. 10, 64–67.

Maynard, D. (1997). The News Delivery Sequence: Bad News and Good News in Conversational Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction. 30, 93–130.

Mehan, H. (1979). Learning Lessons. Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Miserli, A., Komis, V. (2014). Robotics and Programming Concepts in Early Childhood Education: A Conceptual Framework for Designing Educational Scenarios. In Karagiannidis, C., Politis, P., Karasavvidis, I. (Eds), Research on e-Learning and ICT in Education (pp. 99–118). New York: Springer.

Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction. Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction. 51(1):85–106.

Newton, I. (1864). Newton’s Principia. The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. New York: Daniel Adee.

Pelikan, H., Broth, M., Keevallik, L. (2022). When a Robot Comes to Life: The Interactional Achievement of Agency as a Transient Phenomenon. Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality. 5(3):1–36.

Pino, M. (2016). Delivering Criticism through Anecdotes in Interaction. Discourse Studies. 18(6):695–715.

Pollner, M. (1975). 'The Very Coinage of Your Brain': The Anatomy of Reality Disjunctures. Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 5, 411-430.

Pollner, M. (1991). Left of Ethnomethodology: the Rise and Decline of Radical Reflexivity. American Sociological Review 56(3):370 –380.

Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims. Human Studies. 9(2-3), 219–230.

Revaz, B., Sormani, Ph. (2008). Heuristics Gone Anachronistic? Recovering Newton’s Demonstration of the Conservation of Angular Momentum. Paper presented at ScienceFutures – STS CH Meeting. Zurich: ETHZ, Saturday 9 February 2008.

Riedo, F. (2015). Thymio: A Holistic Approach to Designing Accessible Educational Robots. PhD Thesis, Lausanne: EPFL.

Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on Methodology. In J. Heritage, J.M. Atkinson (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 2–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Smith, P.V. (2021). Introduction: Respecifying Education. Ethnographic Studies. 18, 1–19.

Sormani, Ph. (2014). Respecifying Lab Ethnography. An Ethnomethodological Study of Experimental Physics. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Sormani, Ph. (2016). Practice-based Video Analysis: a Position Statement. Societa, Mutamento, Politica. 7, 103–120.

Sormani, Ph. (2019). Reenactment as a Research Strategy: From Performance Art to Video Analysis and Back Again. In Borgdorff, H., Peters, P. & T. Pinch (Eds.), Dialogues Between Artistic Research and Science and Technology Studies (pp. 184–200). London & New York: Routledge.

Sormani, Ph., Alač, M., Bovet, A. & Greiffenhagen, C. (2017). Ethnomethodology, Video Analysis, and STS. In U. Felt, R. Fouché, C.A. Miller & L. Smith-Doerr (Eds.), Handbook in Science and Technology Studies, 4th . (pp. 113–137). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Sudnow, D. (1978). Ways of the Hand: The Organization of Improvised Conduct. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Streeck J., Goodwin, C., LeBaron C. (Eds.), (2010). Embodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

ten Have, P. (2001) Applied Conversation Analysis. In McHoul, A., Rapley, M. (Eds.), How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings. A Casebook of Methods (pp. 3–11). London & New York: Continuum.

Turing, A.M. (1936). On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society. 42, 230–265.

Tutt, D., Hindmarsh, J. (2011). Reenactments at Work: Demonstrating Conduct in Data Sessions. Research on Language and Social Interaction. 44(3), 211–2306.

Wieder, D.L. (1978). ‘Telling the Code’. Jedermanns-Soziologie und soziale Realität. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. 20, 353 –375.

Wieder, D.L., Zimmerman, D.H., Raymond, G. (2010). UCLA: Then and Now. In Leeds-Hurwitz, W. (.), The Social History of Language and Social Interaction Research: People, Places, Ideas. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, pp. 127–158.

Wing, J. (2006). Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM. 49(3), 33–35.

Woolgar, S. (2004). What Happened to Provocation in Science and Technology Studies. History and Technology? 20(4), 339–349.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-12

How to Cite

Sormani, P., & Hostettler, A. (2023). Provoking Situations? Why Reenact “Student-Robot” Interaction, in L.A. or Anywhere. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v6i1.137381