Hvorfor Habermas’ vision for et demokratisk EU ikke kan stå alene

Authors

  • Ditte Maria Brasso Sørensen Institut for Statskundskab, Københavns Universitet

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/politik.v19i3.27411

Abstract

This article discusses Habermas’ vision of a supranational yet democratic EU. The article engages in a discussion of what I take to be two problematic elements of Habermas’ model of EU democracy. Firstly, it discusses the European Parliament as a representative channel, which should, according to Habermas, be strengthened. I here raise the concern that Habermas is not sufficiently sensitive to the tension between the recognition of a weak public and the desire for a strong Parliament. Secondly, I discuss whether executive federalism can also be circumvented by strengthening not just the representation of the European citizens, but also by strengthening parliamentarian representation of the European peoples. Based on these two critiques I end up arguing that Habermas’ vision for EU democracy would benefit from drawing inspiration from the demoicracy literature’s focus on alternative channels of representation.

Author Biography

Ditte Maria Brasso Sørensen, Institut for Statskundskab, Københavns Universitet

Ph.d.-stipendiat på Institut for Statskundskab, Københavns Universitet

References

Bellamy, Richard and Castiglione, Dario (2013) “The models of democracy, political community and representation in the EU” in Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 20, Issue 2, Feburary 2013, pp. 206-223

Bohman, James (2007) Democracy acroos Borders – From Demos to Demoi, The MIT Press, Cambridge

Boon, Vivienne (2007) “Jürgen Habermas’s writing on Europe: Not Habermasian enough?” in Ethical Perspectives,Vol. 14, No 3, pp. 287-310

Cheneval, Francis (2011) The Government of the Peoples: On the Idea and Principles of Multilateral Democracy, Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke

Cheneval, Francis and Schimmelfenning, Frank (2013) “The Case for Democracy in the European Union” in Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 344-350

Cheneval, Fracis et. al (2015) “Demoi-cracy in the European Union: principles, institutions, policies” in Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 1-18

Cochran, Molly (2002) “A Democratic Critique of Cosmopolitan Democracy: Pragmatism form the Bottom-up” in European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 517-548

Cooper, Ian (2013) “Bicameral or Tricameral? National Parliaments and Representative Democracy in the European Union” in Journal of European Integration, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 531-546

Diez, Thomas and Wieneer, Antje (2009) “Introducing the Mosaic of Integration Theory” in Diez, Thomas and Wiener, Antje (ed.) Euroepan Integration Theory – second edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford

Eriksen, Erik O. and Fossum, John Erik (2007) ”Europe in transformation – How to reconstitute democracy?” RECON working paper 2007/01

Fabbrini, Sergio (2011) “The Institutional Future of the European Union” CIES e-Working Paper, No. 109/2011. Available at:
http://www.cies.iscte.pt/destaques/documents/CIES-WP109_Fabbrini.pdf (accessed September 18, 2015)
Fossum, John Erik (2007) “On the Prospects for a Viable Constitutional Patriotism in Complex Multinational Entities: Canada and the European Union Compared”. Paper
presented at the Annual Conference of the Canadian Political Science Association,Saskatoon, May 31, 2007. Retireved at:
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/5015744_Constitutional_patriotism_Canada_and_the_European_Union (accessed September 14 2015)

Habermas, Jürgen (1996) Between Facts and Norms, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Habermas, Jürgen (1998) “The European Nation-State: On the Past and Future of Sovereignty and Citizenship” in The Inclusion of the Other, MIT Press

Habermas, Jürgen (2001) The Post-national Constellation – Political Essays, MIT Press

Habermas, Jürgen (2001b) “Why Europe Needs a Constitution” in New Left Review, Vol. 11, Sept-Oct 2001, pp. 5-26

Habermas, Jürgen (2006) “Feburary 15, or: What binds Euroepans” in The Divided West, Polity Press,Cambridge

Habermas, Jürgen (2009) “An Avantgardistic Instict for Relevances: The Role of the Intellectual and the European Cause” in Habermas, Jürgen (ed.) Europe the Faltering Project, Polity Press, Cambridge

Habermas, Jürgen (2012) The Crises of the European Union, Polity Press, Cambridge

Habermas, Jürgen (2014) “Democracy in Europe – Why the Development of the European Union into a Transnational Democracy is Necessary and How it is Possible”, ARENA Working Paper 13, December 2014

Habermas, Jürgen (2015) The Lure of Technocracy Polity Press, Cambridge

Majone, Giandomenico (1998) “Europe’s Democratic Deficit,” In European Law Journal Vol. 4. Issue 1, pp. 5-28

Morgan, Glyn (2005) The Idea of a European Superstate – Public Justification and European Integration, Princeton University Press, Princeton

Müller, Jan Werner (2008a) “A general theory of constitutional patriotism” in International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 6, Issue 1, pp. 72-95

Müller, Jan Werner (2011) “The Promise of ‘Demoi-Cracy’: Democracy, Diversity, and Domination in the European Public Order” in Political Theory of the European Union, Neyer, Jürgen and Wiener, Antje (eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford

Nicolaïdis, Kalypso (2012) “The Idea of Euroepan Demoicracy” in Dickson, J. and Elefteriadis, P. (eds.) Philosophical Foundations of Euroepan Union Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford

Nicolaïdis, Kalypso (2013) “Pragmatism, Idealism and European Demoicracy” on Social Europe. Available at: http://www.socialeurope.eu/2013/07/pragmatism-idealismand-
european-democracy/ (accesed August 11th 2015)

Nicolaïdis, Kalypso (2013a) “European Demoicracy and Its Crisis” in Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 351-369

Nissen, Christine (2014) “Voting Behavior in the European Parliament: Implications for EU and national politics” DIIS Report 2014:11. Available at: http://pure.diis.dk/ws/files/54981/RP2014_11_christine_nissen_web.pdf (accessed February 13, 2016)

Van Parijs, Phillipe (1997) “Should the EU Become More Democratic?” in Follesdal, A and Koslowski, P. (eds.) Democracy and the European Union, Springer, Berlin

Raunio, Tapio (2015) “The Role of National Legislatures in EU Politics” in Cramme, Olaf and Hobolt, Sara B. (ed.) Democratic Politics in a European Union Under Stress, Oxford University Press, Oxford

Streek, Wolfgang (2016) “What About Capitalism? Jürgen Habermas’s Project of a European Democracy”. Available at: http://www.versobooks.com/blogs/2454-whatabout-
capitalism-jurgen-habermas-s-project-of-a-european-democracy (accessed February 4, 2016)

The Global Journal (2012) “The European Citizen; Just a Myth?” in The Global Journal, May 18, 2012. Available at: http://www.theglobaljournal.net/article/view/695/
(accessed October 26 2015)

Tiilikainen, Teija og Weisner, Claudia (forthcoming) ”Towards a Political Theory of EU Parliamentarianism” in Ihalainen, Pasi, Ilie, Cornelia and Palonen, Kari (ed.) Parliament and Parliamentarianism – A Comparative History of a European Concept (forthcoming)

Downloads

Published

2016-09-01

How to Cite

Brasso Sørensen, D. M. (2016). Hvorfor Habermas’ vision for et demokratisk EU ikke kan stå alene. Politik, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.7146/politik.v19i3.27411