Et syn for sagen: En analyse af videnskab, materialitet og erfarings betydning for Københavns klimatilpasningspolitik

Authors

  • Anne Bach Nielsen
  • Sofie Agnete Bislev

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/politik.v21i1.106143

Abstract

I denne artikel tager vi udgangspunkt i klimaforandringernes særlige videnskabelige status, og undersøger hvordan klimadagsordenen kan aktualiseres igennem materiel synlighed i form af katastrofer. Vi undersøger det skybrud, der ramte København i juli 2011 som en case på, hvordan ekstremvejr kan gøre videnskab til alles eje og tilføje tårer til tørre statistikker. Vores konklusion er dels, at skybruddet mobiliserer den politiske handling på klimaområdet, som videnskaben længe har efterspurgt, og dels at klimatilpasningspolitikken bliver mere kortsigtet og snæver i kølvandet på skybruddet.

References

Asdal, K. (2008). Enacting things through numbers: Taking nature into accounting. Geoforum, årg. 39(1), s. 123-13.

Beaulieu, A., Scharnhorst, A., og Wouters, P. (2007). Not Another Case Study A Mid-dle-Range Interrogation of Ethnographic Case Studies in the Exploration of E-science. Science, Technology & Human Values, årg. 32(6), s. 672-692.

Bennett, J. (2009). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham: Duke University Press.

Beredskabsstyrelsen (2012). Redegørelse vedrørende skybruddet i Storkøbenhavn lørdag d. 2. juli. Tilgængelig på: http://brs.dk/beredskab/DocumentsRedegørelse%20om%20skybruddet%20i%20Storkøbenhavn%202.%20juli%202011.pdf [Tilgået 18.09.17].

Birkland, T. A. (2001). Scientists and coastal hazards: opportunities for participation and policy change. Environmental Geosciences, årg. 8(1), s. 61-67.

Birkland, T. A. (2008). Lessons of disaster: Policy change after catastrophic events. Washington D.C: Georgetown University Press.

Bolin, B. (1994). Science and policy making. Ambio, årg. 23, s. 25–29.

Boolsen, M. W. (2004). Kvalitative analyser i praksis: genveje til problem, teori, metode og analyse. København: Forlaget Politiske Studier.

Bouw, M. (2017). Designing with Risk: Balancing Global Risk and Project Risks. I: Filho & Keenan (red), Climate Change Adaptation in North America, s. 193-208. Springer, Cham.

Cloke, P., Cook, I., Crang, P., Goodwin, M., Painter, J., og Philo, C. (2004). Practising human geography. London: Sage.

Demeritt, D. (2001). The construction of global warming and the politics of science. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, årg. 91, s. 307–37.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2010). Fem misforståelser om casestudiet. I: S. Brinkmann og L. Tanggård Pedersen (red.). Kvalitative metoder. En grundbog, s. 463-487, København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.

Forsyth T. (2012). Politicizing Environmental Science Does Not Mean Denying Climate Science Nor Endorsing It Without Question. Global Environmental Politics, årg. 12(2), s. 18-23.

Fox, N. J., og Alldred, P. (2016). Sociology and the new materialism: Theory, research, action. London: Sage.

Gotham K.F. og Greenberg, M. (2014). Crisis Cities: Disaster and Redevelopment in New York and New Orleans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Guggenheim M. (2014). Introduction: disasters as politics - politics as disasters. Socio-logical Review, årg. 62, s. 1-16.

Hansen, J.L. (2017). Klimaforandringerne har gjort orkanen Irma til et monster. Information, 8 september. Tilgængelig på: https://www.information.dk/udland/2017/09/klimaforandringerne-gjort-orkanen-irma-monster. [Tilgået 30.04.2018]

Howard, J. (2009). Climate change mitigation and adaptation in developed nations: A critical perspective on the adaptation turn in urban climate planning. I: S. Davoudi, J. Crawford, & A. Mehmood (red.), Planning for climate change, s.19-32. London: Earthscan.

Hulme, M. (2011). Meet the humanities. Nature Climate Change, årg. 1, s. 177–179.

Hulme, M. (2009). Why We Disagree About Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Interaction and Opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hulme, M., og Mahony, M. (2010). Climate change: What do we know about the IPCC?. Progress in Physical Geography, årg. 34(5), s.705-718.

IPCC (2001). Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2001. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

IPCC (2007). Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate

Change 2007. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

IPCC (2012). Summary for Policymakers. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation, s. 1-19. Cambridge, UK, og New York: Cambridge University Press.

IPCC (2014a). Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

IPCC (2014b). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.

IPCC 2014c. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Annex II. Glossary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order. London & New York: Routledge Ltd.

Kates, R.W., Travis, W.R. og Wilbanks, T.J. (2012). Transformational adaptation when incremental adaptations to climate change are insufficient. PNAS, årg. 109(19), s. 7156– 7161.

Kvale, S. og Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interview: introduktion til et håndværk. København: Hans Reitzel. 2 udgave.

Københavns Kommune (2009). Københavns Klimaplan. Teknik- og Miljøforvaltningen.

Københavns Kommune (2011). Københavns Klimatilpasningsplan. Tilgængelig på: http://www.klimatilpasning.dk/media/576854/k_benhavns_klimatilpasningsplan.pdf [Tilgået 18.07.2017]

Københavns Kommune (2012). Københavns Kommunes Skybrudsplan 2012. Tilgængelig på: http://kk.sites.itera.dk/apps/kk_pub2/pdf/1018_l9HA0rd2PF.pdf [Tilgået 18.09.2017]

Latour, B. (2009). Politics of nature. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (2011). Waiting for Gaia. A lecture at the French Institute, London. Tilgænge-lig på: http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/124-GAIA-LONDON-SPEAP_0.pdf [Tilgået 28.08.15]

Monbiot, G (2017). Medierne fortier, at orkanen Harvey var endnu en katastrofe forårsa-get af klimaforandringerne. Information, 31. august. Tilgængelig på: https://www.information.dk/udland/2017/08/medierne-fortier-orkanen-harvey-endnu-katastrofe-foraarsaget-klimaforandringerne. [Tilgået 30.04.2018]

Nelson, D.R., Adger, W.N. og Brown, K. (2007). Adaptation to environmental change: Contributions of a resilience framework. Annual Review of Environment and Re-sources, årg. 32, s. 395-419.

NYC (2013). Coastal Climate Resilience: Urban Waterfront Adaptive Strategies. The City of New York, Department of Planning. Tilgængelig på: https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/planning/download/pdf/plans-studies/sustainable-communities/climate-resilience/urban_waterfront.pdf (Tilgået 17.09.2017).

Oppenheimer M., O’Neill, B.C., Webster, M. og Agrawala, S. (2007). Climate change: The limits of consensus. Science, årg. 317, s. 1505–1506.

Pelling, M. (2003). The vulnerability of cities. London: Earthscan.

Pelling, M. og Dill, K. (2006). Natural disasters as catalysts for political action. Chat-ham House ISP/NSC Briefing Paper. 6. 4-6.

Pepermans, Y. og Maeseele, P. (2016). The politicization of climate change: Problem or solution? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, årg. 7(4), s. 478-485.

Rayner, S. (2003). Democracy in the age of assessment: reflections on the roles of exper-tise and democracy in public-sector decision making. Science and public policy, årg. 30(3), s. 163-181.

Rayner, S. (2007). The rise of risk and the decline of politics. Environmental hazards, årg. 7(2), s. 165-172.

Regeringen (2008). Strategi for tilpasning til klimaændringer i Danmark. Energistyrel-sen. Tilgængelig på: http://ec.europa.eu/danmark/documents/alle_emner/miljo/090401_klimatilpasningsstrategi.pdf. [Tilgået 18.09.2017]

Rudiak-Gould, P. (2013). “We have seen it with our own eyes”: Why we disagree about climate change visibility. Weather, Climate, and Society, årg. 5(2), s. 120-132.

Rudiak-Gould, P. (2014). Progress, decline, and the public uptake of climate science. Public Understanding of Science, årg. 23(2), s. 142-156. doi: 10.1177/0963662512444682

Sarewitz, D. (2004). How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environ-mental Science & Policy, årg. 7(5), s. 385–403.

Slovic, P. (2010). The feeling of risk. London: Earthscan.

Slovic, P. og Västfjäll, D. (2010). Affect, moral intuition, and risk. Psychological Inquiry, årg. 21(4), s. 387-398.

Schneider, T. (2010). Ethnographies as case studies? Science and Technology Studies (STS) at Oxford. Tilgængelig på: https://stsoxford.wordpress.com/2010/05/05/ethnographies-as-case- studies/ [Tilgå-et 18.08.15]

Swyngedouw, E. (2010). Apocalypse forever? Post-political populism and the spectre of climate change. Theory, Culture & Society, årg. 27(2-3), s. 213-232.

Tamboukou, M. (2003). Interrogating the ‘emotionalturn’: making connections with Foucault and Deleuze. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, årg. 6(3), s. 209-223.

Taylor, M. (2015). The Political Ecology of Climate Change Adaptation. Livelihoods, agrarian change and the conflicts of development. London, New York: Routledge.

Timmerman, P. og White, R. (1997). Megahydropolis: coastal cities in the context of global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, årg. (3), s. 205-234.

Tol, R. (2011). Regulating knowledge monopolies: the case of the IPCC. Climate Change, årg. 108(4), s. 827–839.

Urry, J. (2009). Sociology and climate change. The Sociological Review, årg. 57(s2), 84-100.

Yanow, D. (2006). Introduction. I: D. Yanow og P. Schwartz-Shea (red.). Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn, s. xi-xxvii. New York, London: ME Sharpe.

Västfjäll, D., Peters, E. og Slovic, P. (2010). Affect, risk perception and future optimism after the tsunami disaster. I: P. Slovic (red.). The feeling of Risk, s. 109-124London: Earthscan

Wisner, B., Blaikie P., Cannon T. og Davis, L. (2004). At Risk: natural hazards, peo-ple’s vulnerability and disasters. Taylor and Francis: London.

Wolf, E. E. A., og Van Dooren, W. (2017). How policies become contested: a spiral of imagination and evidence in a large infrastructure project. Policy Sciences, årg. 50(3), s. 449-468.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-01

How to Cite

Nielsen, A. B., & Bislev, S. A. (2018). Et syn for sagen: En analyse af videnskab, materialitet og erfarings betydning for Københavns klimatilpasningspolitik. Politik, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.7146/politik.v21i1.106143