Sensuous proximity in research methods with expert teams, media sports, and esports practices
This paper examines epistemological issues in game studies research, specifically exploring qualitative research approaches to networked, expert computer game teams who engage in esports practices. Expert teams deliver their expert practice in part through interembodied sensitivities to sensorial team-based phenomena, which is made across multiple bodies and machines in the process of play. Drawing on fieldwork with World of Warcraft Arena tournament esports teams and research methods orientations from games studies, sensuous ethnography, and sports studies, a position of sensuous proximity in games research is explored and developed as a suite of research guidelines for engaging with esports teams high performance practices. I suggest a research approach that involves differing lenses and stances in the study of embodied team play, and varying scales of sensuous proximity to the layers of expert team practices that augmens the notion of playing research in game studies.
Aarseth, E. (2003). Playing research: Methodological approaches to game analysis. Retrieved from: http://www.spilforskning.dk/gameapproaches/GameApproaches2.pdf
Allen-Collinson, J., & Hockey, J. (2011). Feeling the way: Notes toward a haptic phenomenology of distance running and scuba diving. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 46(3), 330-345.
Arnason, L. (2011). New media, new research methods: Current approaches to research in the virtual world. Media International Australia, 138, 98-111. DOI: 10.1177/1329878X1113800112
Arnold, P. J. (1979). Meaning in movement, sport, and physical education. London: Heinemann Education.
Boellstorff, T., Nardi, B., Pearce, C., et al. (2012). Ethnography and virtual worlds: A handbook of methods. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Brownell, S. (2006). Sport ethnography: A personal account. In D. Hobbs, & R. Wright (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of fieldwork. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Burk, D. (2013). Owning e-Sports: Proprietary rights in professional computer gaming. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 161, 1535-1578.
Butryn, T. (2002). Cyborg horizons: Sport and the ethics of self-technologization. In A. Miah, & S. Eassom (Eds.), Sport technology: History, philosophy, and policy (pp. 111-134). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Chen, M. (2009). Communication, coordination, and camaraderie in World of Warcraft. Games and Culture, 4(1), 47-73. DOI: 10.1177/1555412008325478
Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture. The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Consalvo, M. (2008). Lag, lingo & language: Theorizing noise in online games. In M. Wolf, & B. Perron (Eds.), The video game theory reader 2 (pp. 295-312). New York: Routledge.
De Garis, L. (1999). Experiments in pro wrestling: Toward a performative and sensuous sport ethnography. Sociology of Sport Journal, 16, 65-74. DOI: 10.1123/ssj.16.1.65
Dourish, P. (2004). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Free Associations Books.
Harper, T. (2010). The art of war: Fighting games, performativity, and social game play. (Doctoral dissertation). Ohio University, USA.
Hemphill, D. (2005). Cybersport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 32(2), 195-207. DOI: 10.1080/00948705.2005.9714682
Hine, C. (2005). Virtual methods and the sociology of cyber-social-scientific knowledge. In C. Hine (Ed.), Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet (pp.1-16). Oxford: Berg.
Hughson, J., & Inglis, D. (2002). Inside the beautiful game: Toward a Merleau-Pontian phenomenology of soccer play. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, XXIX, 1-15. DOI: 10.1080/00948705.2002.9714619
Hutchins, B. (2008). Signs of meta-change in second modernity: The growth of e-sport and the World Cyber Games. New Media & Society, 10(6), 851-869. DOI: 10.1177/1461444808096248
Jhally, S. (1984). The spectacle of accumulation: Material and cultural factors in the evolution of the sports/media complex. Insurgent Sociologist, 12(3), 41-57.
Jin, D. Y. (2010). Korea’s online gaming empire. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jin, D. Y., & Chee, F. (2008). Age of new media empires: A critical interpretation of the Korean online game industry. Games and Culture 3(38), 38-58. DOI: 10.1177/1555412007309528
Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. New York: Routledge.
Longhurst, R., Ho, E., & Johnston, L. (2008). Using “the body” as an “instrument of research”: Kimch’i and pavlova. Area, 40(2), 208-217. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00805.x
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The phenomenology of perception, trans. C. Smith. London: Routledge.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible, trans. A. Lingis, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Pallasmaa, J. (2005). The eyes of the skin: Architecture and the senses. Chichester: Wiley Academic Publishers.
Paterson, M. (2009). Haptic geographies: Ethnography, haptic knowledges and sensuous dispositions. Progress in Human Geography 33(6), 766-788. DOI: 10.1177/0309132509103155
Pearce, C. (2009). Communities of play: Emergent cultures in multiplayer games and virtual worlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pink, S. (2007). Doing visual ethnography. London: Sage.
Richardson, L., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 959-978). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Richardson, I., & Keogh, B. (2017). Mobile media matters: The ethnography and phenomenology of itinerant interfaces. In L. Hjorth, H. Horst, A. Galloway, et al. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to digital ethnography (pp. 211-220). New York: Routledge.
Rowe, D. (2003). Sport, culture & media: The unruly trinity. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
Rowe, D. (2013). The sport/media complex: Formation, flowering, and future. In D. L. Andrews, & B. Carrington (Eds.), A companion to sport (Blackwell companions in cultural studies). (pp. 61-77). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.
Sokolowski, R. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, N. (2009). Power play: Digital gaming goes pro. (Doctoral dissertation). York University, Toronto, Canada.
Taylor, N. (2016). Now You’re Playing With Audience Power. Critical Studies in Media Communication 33(4), 293-307.Taylor, T. L. (2006). Play between worlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Taylor, T. L. (2009). The assemblage of play. Games and Culture, 4(4), 331-339.
Taylor, T. L. (2012). Raising the stakes: The rise of professional computer gaming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Taylor, T. L. (2018). Watch me play: Twitch and the rise of game live streaming. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Visweswaran, K. (1994). Fictions of feminist ethnography. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Waquant, L. (2004). Body & soul: Notebooks of an apprentice boxer. New York: Oxford University Press.
Witkowski, E. (2012). Inside the huddle: The phenomenology and sociology of team play in networked computer games. Ph.D. Thesis, IT University of Copenhagen, DK.
Witkowski, E. (2019). Counter-strike: Spectatorship. In N. Huntemann, & M. Payne (Eds.), How to play videogames. New York: NYU Press.
Witkowski, E., & Manning, J. (forthcoming). Player power: Networked careers in esports and high performance game livestreaming practices. Convergence.
Zelditch, M. (1962). Some methodological problems of field studies. American Journal of Sociology, 67(5), 566-576.
Articles submitted to MedieKultur should not be submitted to or published in other journals. Articles published in MedieKultur may be used (downloaded) and reused (distributed, copied, cited) for non-commercial purposes with reference to the authors and publication host.
The authors and MedieKultur own the copyright to the published articles and reviews.