I’d rather be a cyborg than a gamerbro: How masculinity mediates research on digital play

  • Nick Taylor North Carolina State University
Keywords: esports, ethnography, feminism, methodology

Abstract

This article offers a feminist and media-theoretical approach to ethnographic reflexivity, understood as the researcher’s own agency in shaping encounters with and producing accounts of digital cultures. Looking specifically at male-dominated domains of intensive and competitive play in public sites, such as arcades, local area network (LAN) parties, and eSports tournaments, this article asks: How might masculinity mediate studies of digital play? To address this, I weave together feminist ethnography with materialist media theory, offering an understanding of researcher subjectivity (in this case, my subjectivity) as a media instrument: An assemblage of social locations and learned competencies which does not simply gather, but configures and legitimates, particular knowledges about gaming cultures. Applying this to a problematic instance from fieldwork I conducted at a large-scale gaming event in 2011, I work through the methodological and epistemological quandaries associated with both studying and embodying the social privileges associated with male-dominated media cultures.

Author Biography

Nick Taylor, North Carolina State University

Assistant Professor

Department of Communication

References

Andrejevic, M. (2005). The work of watching one another: Lateral surveillance, risk, and governance. Surveillance and Society, 2(4), 479–497.

Andrejevic, M. (2016). Theorizing Drones and Droning Theory In A. Završnik (Ed.), Drones and unmanned aerial systems: Legal and social implications for security and surveillance (pp. 21-43). Switzerland: Springer. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-23760-2_2 M

Ash, J. (2013). Technologies of captivation: Videogames and the attunement of affect. Body & Society, 19(1), 27-51.

Baker, V. (1987). Pitching a tent in the native village: Malinowski and participant observation. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 143(1), 14-24.

Banet-Weiser, S. & Miltner, K.M.(2016). #MasculinitySoFragile:culture, structure, and networked misogyny. Feminist Media Studies, 16(1), 171-174. DOI:10.1080/14680777.2016.1120490.

Behrenshausen, B.G. (2007). Toward a (kin)aesthetic of video gaming: The case of Dance Dance Revolution. Games and Culture, 2(4), 335­354.

Burrell, J. (2009). The field site as a network: A strategy for locating ethnographic research. Field Methods, 21, 181–199. DOI:10.1177/1525822X08329699

Consalvo, M. (2012). Confronting toxic gamer culture: A challenge for feminist game studies scholars. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, 1. DOI:10.7264/ N33X84KH

Ezzy, D. (2010). Qualitative interviewing as an embodied emotional performance. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(3), 163-170.

Galison, P. (2003). Einstein’s clocks, Poincare’s maps: Empires of time. New York: W. W. Norton.

Giddings, S. & Kennedy, H. (2008). Little Jesuses and *@#?-off robots: on cybernetics, aesthetics, and not being very good at Lego Star Wars. In M. Swalwell J. Wilson (eds.), The Pleasures of Computer Gaming: Essays on Cultural History, Theory and Aesthetics (pp. 13-32). Jefferson: McFarland.

Ging, D. (2017). Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities. DOI:1097184X17706401

Gray, K. L. (2012). Intersecting oppressions and online communities. Information, Communication & Society, 15, 411–428.

Haraway, D. (1985). Manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review, 80, 65–108.

Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14(3), 575–599.

Harper, T. (2014). The culture of digital fighting games: Performance and practice. New York: Routledge.

Harrison, B. & Roberts, D.L. (2011). Using sequential observations to model and predict player behavior. FDG’11. Bordeaux, France. June 29-July 1.

Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Hsu, J. (Jan. 2015). Inside the largest virtual psychology lab in the world. Medium. Accessed online at: https://medium.com/backchannel/inside-the-largest-virtual-psychology-lab-in-the-world-7c0d2c43cda5.

Jenson, J., & de Castell, S. (2008). Theorizing gender and digital gameplay: Oversights, accidents and surprises. Eludamos. Journal for Computer Game Culture, 2 (1), 15­25.

Johnson, R. (Forthcoming). Technomasculinity and its influence in video game production. In N. Taylor and G. Voorhees (eds.), Masculinity and gaming: Mediated masculinities in play. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kocurek, C. (2015). Coin-operated Americans: Rebooting boyhood at the video game arcade. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York, NY: McGraw- Hill.

Niedenthal, S. (2012). Skin games: Fragrant play, scented media and the stench of digital games. Eludamos. Journal for Computer Game Culture,6(1), 101­131.

Ortiz, S.M. (2005). The ethnographic process of gender management: Doing the “right” masculinity with wives of professional athletes. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(2), 265-290.

Packer, J. (2013). The conditions of media’s possibility: A Foucauldian approach to media history. In J. Nerone (ed.), Media history and the foundations of media studies (pp. 1-32). New York: Blackwell.

Packer, J. & Wiley, S.B.C. (2012). Introduction: The materiality of communication. In J. Packer and S.B.C. Wiley (eds.), Communication matters: Materialist approaches to media, mobility, and networks (pp. 3-16). New York: Routledge.

Peters, J.D.P. (2015). The marvelous clouds: Towards a philosophy of elemental media. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Pink,

Sarah (2009). Doing sensory ethnography. London: SAGE. Ratan, R., Taylor, N., Hogan, J., Kennedy, T., & Williams, D. (2015). Stand by your man: an examination of gender disparity in League of Legends. Games and Culture, 10(5). DOI: 10.1177/1555412014567228.

Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Toronto: Altamira Press.

Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York: Zed Books. Visweswaran, K. (1994). Fictions of feminist ethnography. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Taylor, T.L. (2006). Does WoW change everything? How a PvP server, multinational player base, and surveillance mod scene caused me pause. Games and Culture, 1(4), 318–337.

Taylor, T. L. (2012). Raising the stakes: E-sports and the professionalization of computer gaming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Taylor, T. L. and Witkowski, E. (2010). This is how we play it: What a mega-LAN can teach us about games. FDG ’10. Montery, CA, June 19–21. Tuhiwai

Voorhees, G. (2015). Neoliberal masculinity: The government of play and masculinity in e-sports.” In T. Oates and R. Bookey (eds.), Playing to Win: Sports, Video Games, and the Culture of Play (pp. 63-91). Bloomington IN, Indiana University Press.

Witkowski, E. (2013). Eventful masculinities: Negotiations of hegemonic sporting masculinities at LANs. In M. Consalvo, K. Mitgutsch & A. Stein (eds.), Sports Videogames (pp. 217-235) New York: Routledge.

Published
2018-06-14
How to Cite
Taylor, N. (2018). I’d rather be a cyborg than a gamerbro: How masculinity mediates research on digital play. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 34(64), 21 p. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i64.96990