From everyday communicative figurations to rigorous audience news repertoires: A mixed method approach to cross-media news consumption


  • Christian Kobbernagel Department of Communication, Business and Information Technologies, Roskilde University
  • Kim Christian Schrøder Department of Communication, Business and Information Technologies, Roskilde University



In the last couple of decades there has been an unprecedented explosion of news media platforms and formats, as a succession of digital and social media have joined the ranks of legacy media. We live in a ‘hybrid media system’ (Chadwick, 2013), in which people build their cross-media news repertoires from the ensemble of old and new media available. This article presents an innovative mixed-method approach with considerable explanatory power to the exploration of patterns of news media consumption. This approach tailors Q-methodology in the direction of a qualitative study of news consumption, in which a card sorting exercise serves to translate the participants’ news media preferences into a form that enables the researcher to undertake a rigorous factor-analytical construction of their news consumption repertoires. This interpretive, factor-analytical procedure, which results in the building of six audience news repertoires in Denmark, also preserves the qualitative thickness of the participants’ verbal accounts of the communicative figurations of their day-in-the-life with the news media.


Baas, L., & Thomas, D. B. (1993). The Issue of Generalization in Q methodology: "Reliable Schematics" Revisited. Operant Subjectivity, 16(1/2), 19-36.

Borsboom, D. (2005). Measuring the mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bro, P. & Wallberg, F. (2014). Digital gatekeeping. News media versus social media. Digital journalism, 2 (3): 446-454. DOI 10.1080/21670811.2014.895507.

Brown, S. R. (1980). Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Brown, S. R. (1993) A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 16, pp. 91-138.

Brown, S. R., Danielson, S., & van Exel, J. (2014). Overly ambitious critics and the Medici Effect: a reply to Kampen and Tamás. Quality & Quantity, 1-15. doi:10.1007/s11135-014-0007-x

Brown, S. R., & Good, J. M. M. (2010). Q Methodology. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Research Design. (pp. 1149-1156). Thousands Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Brüggemann, M., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Humprecht, E. & Castro, L. (2014). Hallin and Mancini Revisited: Four Empirical Types of Western Media Systems. Journal of Communication 64: 1037-1065.

Chadwick, A. (2013). The Hybrid Media System. Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford U.P.

Couldry, N. (2012). Media, Society, World: Social Theory and Digital Media Practice. Cambridge: Polity.

Couldry, N. & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing Mediatization: Contexts, Traditions, Arguments. Communication Theory 23: 191-202.

Couldry, N., Livingstone, S. and Markham, T. (2007). Media consumption and public engagement. Beyond the presumption of attention. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Courtois, C., Schrøder, K.C. & Kobbernagel, C. (2015). ”Exploring landscapes of news consumption cross-nationally: The use of Q methodology to fuse quantitative and qualitative approaches for increased explanatory power in comparative research”. In: F. Zeller, C. Ponte, & B. O'Neill (eds.), Revitalising audience research: Innovations in European audience research. (s. 123-142). New York and London: Routledge.

Curran, J., Brink Lund, A., Iyengar, S. andSalovaara-Moring, I. (2009). Media system, public knowledge and democracy: A comparative study. European Journal of Communication 24 (5), 2009: 5-26.

Dahlgren, P. (2006). Doing citizenship: The cultural origins of civic agency in the public sphere. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 9:3, pp. 267-286.

Danielson, S. (2009). Q Method and Surveys: Three Ways to Combine Q and R. Field Methods, 21(3), 219-237.

Davis, C. and Michelle, C., 2011. Q Methodology in Audience Research: Bridging the Qualita-tive/Quantitative ‘Divide’? Participations, 8(2), pp.559-593.

Fairweather, J. R. (1981) Reliability and validity of Q results: Some empirical evidence. Operant Subjectivity, 5(1), 2-16

Fairweather, J. R., & Rinne, T. (2012). Clarifying a basis for qualitative generalization using approaches which identify shared culture. Qualitative Research, 12(4), 473-485.

Hallin, D. & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Heikkilä, H. & Ahva, L. (2014). The relevance of journalism. Studying news audience in a digital era. Journalism Practice, DOI 10/1080/17512786.2014.928465.

Helles, R., Ørmen, J., Radil, C., and Jensen, K. B. (2015). The media landscapes of European audiences. International Journal of Communication vol. 9, pp.299-320.

Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Published Research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393-416.

Hepp, Andreas (2013). The communicative figurations of mediatized worlds: Mediatization research in times of the ‘mediation of everything. European Journal of Communication 28 (6), 615-629.

Hermida, A.,Fletcher, F., Korell, D. and Donna Logan, D. (2012). ‘Share, Like, Recommend’, Journalism Studies 13 (5-6): 815–824. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2012.664430.

Hille, S. & Bakker, P. (2013). I like news. Searching for the ’Holy Grail’ of social media: The use of Facebook by Dutch news media and their audiences. European Journal of Communication, 28 (6), 663-680.

Hölig, S., Nielsen, R.K. & Schrøder, K.C. (2016). Changing forms of cross-media news use in Western Europe and beyond. In: Linaa Jensen, J., Mortensen, M. & Ørmen, J (eds.). News across Media – the production, distribution and consumption of news in a cross-media perspective. New York: Routledge.

Jones, J. P. (2006). A cultural approach to the study of mediated citizenship. Social Semiotics, 16:2, pp. 365-383.

Kampen, J., & Tamás, P. (2014). Overly ambitious: contributions and current status of Q methodology. Quality & Quantity, 48(6), 3109-3126. doi:10.1007/s11135-013-9944-z

Krajina, Z., Moores, S. & Morley, D. (2014). Non-media-centric media studies: A cross-generational conversation. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 17 (6): 682-700.

Media Insight Project (2015). How Millennials Get News: Inside the Habits of America’s First Digital Generation. The American Press Institute and The AP-NORC Center for Public Affairs.

Meijer, I. C. & Kormelink, T. G. (2014). Checking, sharing, clicking and linking. Changing patterns of news use between 2004 and 2014. Digital Journalism,

Morley, D. (2009). For a materialist, non-media-centric media studies. Television & New Media, 10 (1): 114-116.

Newman, N., Levy D. & Nielsen, R. K. (2015). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2015. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

Nielsen, K.C. & Schrøder, K.C. (2014). “The relative importance of social media for accessing, finding, and engaging with news: An eight-country cross-media comparison”, Digital Journalism. DOI

Nossek, H.; Adoni, H.; and Nimrod, G. (2015). Is print really dying? The state of print media use in Europe. International Journal of Communication, vol. 9: 365-385.

Papathanassopoulos, S., Cohen, S., Curran, J., Aalberg, T., Rowe, D., Jones, P., Rojas, H. and Tiffen, R. (2013). Online Threat, but Television Is Still Dominant. Journalism Practice, DOI 10.1080/17512786.2012.761324.

Park, H. S., Dailey, R., & Lemus, D. (2002). The Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis and Principal Components Analysis in Communication Research. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 562-577.

Perusko, Z., Vozab, D. & Cuvalo, A. (2015). Digital Mediascapes, Institutional Frameworks, and Audience Practices Across Europe. International Journal of Communication 9: 342-364.

Pew Research Center (2014). Political Mobilization and Media Habits. Research Report published at

Picard, Robert (2014). Twilight or new dawn of journalism? Evidence from the changing news ecosystem. Journalism Studies, 15 (5): 500-510, DOI 10.1080/1461670X.2014.895530

Rogers, R. S. (1995). Q Methodology. In Smith, J.A., Harré, R. and Langenhove, L.V. (eds), Rethinking Methods in Psychology, London: Sage.

Rouw, C. & Hermans, L., (2015). Beyond the News: How do Young Adults Get Informed and Civically Engaged? Paper for The Future of Journalism Conference, Cardiff, UK, September 2015.

Schmolck, P. (2014). PQmethod Manual version 2.35. Retrieved from

Schrøder, K.C. (2012) "Methodological pluralism as a vehicle of qualitative generalization". Participations. Journal of audience and reception studies 9 (2), 798-825.

Schrøder, K.C. (2014). "News media old and new. – Fluctuating audiences, news repertoires and locations of consumption". Journalism Studies. DOI:10.1080/1461670X.2014.890332.

Schrøder, K.C. (2015). Audiences’ news media repertoires as resources for public connection.

Preliminary report from a cross-national comparative study. Paper presented at the ICA Conference, 21-25 May, 2015, San Juan, Puerto Rico.

Schrøder, K.C., Drotner, K., Kline, S. & Murray, C. (2003) Researching Audiences: A Practical Guide to Methods in Media Audience Analysis, London: Edward Arnold.

Schrøder, K.C. & Kobbernagel, C. (2010). “Towards a typology of cross-media news consumption: a qualitative-quantitative synthesis”, Northern Lights, vol. 8, pp. 115-138.

Shehata, A., Wadbring, I. & Hopmann, D. N. (2015). A Longitudinal Analysis of News-Avoidance Over Three Decades: From Public Service Monopoly to Smartphones. Paper presented to the ICA conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico, May 2015.

Stephenson, W. (1953). The Study of Behavior: Q-technique and Its Methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Stephenson, W. (1986). Protoconcorsus: The Concourse Theory of Communication. Operant Subjectivity, 9(2), 37-58.

Stricklin, M., & Almeida, R. (2004). PCQ Analysis Software for Q Technique. Retrieved from

Thompson, A. W., Dumyahn, S., Prokopy, L. S., Amberg, S., Baumgart-Getz, A., Jackson-Tyree, J., and Mase, A. S. (2013). Comparing Random Sample Q and R Methods for Understanding Natural Resource Attitudes. Field Methods, 25(1), 25-46.

Webster, Frank (2014). The Marketplace of Attention. How audiences take shape in a digital age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Wolf, Cornelia and Anna Schnauber (2014). News consumption in the mobile era. The role of mobile devices and traditional journalism’s content within the user’s information repertoire. Digital Journalism, DOI 10.1080/21670811.2014.942497.

Zeller, F., O’Kane, J., Godo, E., & Goodrum, A. (2013). A Subjective User-Typology Of Online News Consumption. Digital Journalism, 2(2), 214-231. doi:10.1080/21670811.2013.801686.




How to Cite

Kobbernagel, C., & Schrøder, K. C. (2016). From everyday communicative figurations to rigorous audience news repertoires: A mixed method approach to cross-media news consumption. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 32(60), 26 p.