Digital distinctions: mechanisms of difference in digital media use
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v31i58.18501Keywords:
Digital media use, acts of distinction, Bourdieu, cultureAbstract
This article aims at understanding to understand the distinctive mechanisms of digital media use, seen in relation to cultural practices at large. The empirical material is a survey study of university students at the Business Administration, Media and Communication Studies, Political Science and Philosophy departments at Södertörn University, Sweden. The empirical analysis deals with the students’ digital media use and preferences, and how these are related to their broader cultural practices and preferences. Specific attention is paid to the webpages the students mention in the survey, and how these are distributed among the groups. By showing detailed information on these areas, the mechanisms of difference of digital media use are revealed.References
Bengtsson, S. &Lundgren, L. (2005): The Don Quixote of Youth Culture: Media Use and Cultural Preferences among Students in Sweden and Estonia, Huddinge: Södertörn Academic Studies. , Mariek, V. & , R. (2013): Adolescents’ school experience and the importance of having a “cool” mobile phone: Conformity, compensation and resistance? Poetics, Vol. 41(3), pp. 265–293. Buendía, N., Juarez, B & Peercy, M. (2004): The Geographies of Difference: The Production of the East Side, West Side, and Central City School. American Educational Research Journal. Vol. 41 (4), pp. 833-863. Bourdieu, P. & Passeron, J. (1970/2008): Reproduktionen: Bidrag till en teori om utbildningssystemet [La Reproduction]. Arkiv Förlag. Bourdieu, P. (1979/1984): Distinction. A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. Bourdieu, P. (1986): The forms of capital. In Richardson, J.J. (Ed.), Handbook for Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. (pp. 241-258) Greenwood Press: New York Bourdieu, P. (1989/1996): The State Nobility. Elite schools in the field of power. Cambridge: Polity Press. Bourdieu, P. (1992/1996): The Rules of Art. Genesis and the structure of the literary field. Cambridge: Polity Press. Bourdieu, P. (2001): Masculine Domination. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. Bucht, C. & Eva, H. (2013): Young People in the Nordic Digital Media Culture: A Statistical Overview Compiled by Catharina Bucht and Eva Harrie. The International Clearinghouse on Children, Youht and Media. Göteborg: Nordicom. Danielsson, M. (2014): Digitala distinktioner. Klass och kontinuitet i unga mäns vardag. (diss). Halmstad: Högskolan i Halmstad. de Solier, I. (2005): TV Dinners: Culinary Television, Education and Distinction. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies. Vol. 19(4), pp 465-481. Gripsrud, J. Hovden, J.& Hallvard, M. (2011): Changing relations: Class, education and cultural capital. Poetics, Volume 39 (6), pp. 507-529. Hargittai, E. (2010): Digital Na(t)ives? Variations in the Internet Skills and Uses among members of the “Net Generation”. Sociological Inquiry, Vol. 80 (1), pp. 92-113. Hollingworth, S. Mansaray, A. Allen, K. & Rose, A. (2011): Parents’ perspectives on technology and children’s learning in the home: social class and the role of the habitus. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 27, pp. 347-360. Kalmus, V.Realo, A. & Siibak, A. (2011): Motives for Internet use and their relationship with personality traits and socio-demographic factors. TRAMES, Vol. 15(4), pp. 385-403. Kuipers, G. (2006): Television and taste hierarchy: the case of Dutch television comedy. Media, Culture & Society, vol. 28(3) pp. 359-378. Meyen, M., Pfaff-Rüdinger, S., Düdenhöffer, K. & Huss, J. (2010): The Internet use in everyday life: a typology of Internet users. Media, Culture and Society, Vol. 32,(5), pp. 873-882. North, S., Snyder, I. & Bulfin, S. (2008): Digital tastes: Social class and young people’s technology use. Information, communication & society, Vol. 11, (7), pp. 895-911. Petrov, P. & C von Feilitzen, C. (2005): Virtuellt rum och socialt rum: om IT i vardagslivet. Huddinge: Södertörn Academic Studies. Robinson, L. (2009): A taste for the necessary: A Bourdieuian approach to digital inequality. Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 12, (4), pp. 488-507. Selwyn, N. (2006): Digital division or digital decision? Non-users and low users of computers. Poetics, Vol. 34, pp. 273-292. Sterne, J. (2003): Bourdieu, technique and technology. Cultural Studies, Vol. 17(3-4), pp. 367-389. Van Deursen, A., van Dijk, J. & Peters, O. (2011): Rethinking Internet skills: The contribution of gender, age, education, Internet experience, and hours online to medium- and content-related Internet skills. Poetics, Vol. 39, pp. 125-144. Van Dijk, J. & Hacker, K. (2003): The Digital Divide as a Complex and Dynamic Phenomenon. The Information Society, Vol. 19, pp. 315-326. Van Eijk, K. (1997): The impact of family background and educational attainment on cultural consumption: a sibling analysis. Poetics Vol. 25, pp. 195-224. Willekes, M. & Lievens, J (2014): Family (and) Culture: The effect of cultural capital within the family on the cultural participation of adolescents. Poetics, Vol. 42, pp. 98-113. Willekens, M., Daenekindt, S. & Lievens, J (2014): Whose Education Matters More? Mothers’ and Fathers’ Education and the Cultural Participation of Adolescents. Cultural Sociology, Vol. 8, pp. 291-309 Zillien, N. & Eszter, H. (2009): Digital Distinction: Status-Specific Types of Internet Usage. Social Science Quarterly. Vol. 90(2), pp. 274–291.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Author and Journal.
Articles published after January 1 2024 are licensed under CCBY 4.0.
Articles published until December 31 2023 are licensed under CCBYNCND.
Articles submitted to MedieKultur should not be submitted to or published in other journals.