Knowledge production and epistemic injustices

The use of digital technologies and artificial intelligence

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v40i76.143529

Keywords:

Literature review, epistemic biases, feminist epistemology, decolonial epistemology, epistemic injustice, artificial intelligent

Abstract

This article explores the complexities emerging from the knowing subject engaging in knowledge generation through artificial intelligence and digital technologies. By exploring a recent literature review as our case study, the possible existence of biases that may distort the studied reality and generate epistemic inequalities is investigated. A reflexive approach drawn from decolonial and feminist perspectives is applied. Findings underline the presence of epistemic biases, such as the invisibility of the knowing subject and knowledge representation, indicating that they are not simple isolated biases but part of a systemic problem that transcends specific scientific and technological practices. Ultimately, the complexity leading to epistemic biases is highlighted, encompassing interconnected systems, including the scientific, technological, and institutional.

Author Biographies

Ana Isabel Zermeño-Flores, University of Colima

Mexican. Full professor at the University of Colima (UCOL) and registered at the University Center for Social Research. She holds a doctorate in Audiovisual Communication from the Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Spain. Leader of the academic body "Communication and Culture". Coordinator of Agorante, a research group in society and technology. Coordinator of the Kaleidoscope Network, an international network on digital culture research and human development. Professor of the Faculty of Letters and Communication and the Doctorate in Sociocultural Studies of Inequalities at UCOL. Member of the National System of Researchers, Level II of the National Council of Humanities, Science and Technology (CONHACYT). Her lines of research are "Communication for social change", "Technologies for development" (digital inclusion from the human perspective), "Youth" (youth culture), and "Knowledge inequalities".

Thomas Tufte, Loughborough University and University of Johannesburg

Of Danish nationality, he is a full professor and director of the Institute for Media and Creative Industries at Loughborough University in London, United Kingdom. He is also a Senior Research Associate at the University of Johannesburg (South Africa, 2013-) and an Extraordinary Professor at the University of the Free State (South Africa, 2020-). He holds a Ph.D. in Communication from the University of Copenhagen, Denmark (1995). With a Ph.D. in Communication from the University of Copenhagen, his research focuses on communication's role in citizen mobilization during change processes. He has worked extensively in Africa, Latin America, and Spain. In addition to his academic role, he has consulted for international organizations, including UN agencies and NGOs. His recent books include "Communication for Social Change" and "Communicating Change – Concepts to Think With."

Mabel Andrea Navarrete-Vega, University of Colima

Professor-Researcher at the Faculty of Social Work of the University of Colima, Mexico. She has a PhD in Innovation in Educational Technology from the Autonomous University of Querétaro and is attached to the University Center for Social Research of the University of Colima, where she has developed digital inclusion projects at the local and national level linked to the information technology line of knowledge. and communication for development. Among her recent publications are articles on active media production in the training of communicators and on technological practices in young universities.

References

Álvarez-Martínez, F. J., Borrás-Rocher, F., Micol, V., & Barrajón-Catalán, E. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Applied to Improve Scientific Reviews: The Antibacterial Activity of Cistus Plants as Proof of Concept. Antibiotics, 12(2), 327. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12020327

Bolaños, F., Salatino, A., Osborne, F., & Motta, E. (2024). Artificial Intelligence for Literature Reviews: Opportunities and Challenges. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2402.08565

Bueter, A. (2022). Bias as an epistemic notion. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 91, 307-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.12.002

Cuklanz, L., & Rodríguez, M. P. (2020). New perspectives in feminist methodological research. Investigaciones Feministas, 11(2), 193-209. https://doi.org/10.5209/infe.70122

De La Torre-López, J., Ramírez, A., & Romero, J. R. (2023). Artificial intelligence to automate the systematic review of scientific literature. Computing, 105(10), 2171-2194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-023-01181-x

Feldman, A., Divoll, K. A., & Rogan-Klyve, A. (2013). Becoming Researchers: The Participation of Undergraduate and Graduate Students in Scientific Research Groups. Science Education, 97(2), 218-243. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21051

Freire, P. (2002). Educación y cambio. Galerna - Búsqueda de Ayllu.

Fricker, M. (2021). Conceptos de injusticia epistémica en evolución. Las Torres de Lucca. International Journal of Political Philosophy, 10(19), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.5209/ltdl.76466

Gao, J., & Wang, D. (2023). Quantifying the Benefit of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2304.10578

García, D., & Ruiz, M. G. (2021). Un viaje por las emociones en procesos de investigación feminista. Empiria. Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales, 50, 21. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.50.2021.30370

García, E., & Díaz, S. (2022). Una propuesta de investigación feminista para el estudio de la misoginia: Notas reflexivas de los procesos de investigación. Empiria. Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales, 56, 83-106. https://doi.org/empiria.56.2022.34439

Gjesdal, A. M. (2013). The Influence of Genre Constraints on Author Representation in Medical Research Articles. The French Indefinite Pronoun On in IMRAD Research Articles. Discours, 12. https://doi.org/10.4000/discours.8770

Grosfoguel, R. (2022). Los cuatro genocidios/epistemicidios del largo siglo XVI y las estructuras de conocimiento racistas/sexistas de la modernidad en la universidad occidental. 21, 1-20.

Guilleminot, C. (2020). Sesgos de género en la construcción científica del conocimiento. Tecnología & Sociedad, 9, 55-68.

Hilbert, M. (2020). Digital technology and social change: The digital transformation of society from a historical perspective. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 22(2), 189-194. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.2/mhilbert

Kwet, M. (2019). Digital colonialism: US empire and the New Imperialism in the Global South. Race & Class, 60(4), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396818823172

Li, J., Xiao, W., & Zhang, C. (2023). Data security crisis in universities: Identification of key factors affecting data breach incidents. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 270. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01757-0

Lugones, M. (2011). Hacia un feminismo decolonial. La manzana de la discordia, 6(2), 105-119.

Mejías, U., & Couldry, N. (2019). Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media, 20(4), 336-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632

Murrup-Stewart, C., Atkinson, P., & Adams, K. (2022). Storying Ways to Reflect on Power, Contestation, and Yarning Research Method Application. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5173

Quijano, A. (2011). Colonialidad del poder y clasificación social. Contextualizaciones Latinoamericanas, 3(5), 122-151.

Sadin, É. (2018). La silicolonización del mundo: La irresistible expansión del liberalismo digital. Caja Negra.

Safnil. (2000). Rhetorical Structure Analysis of the Indonesian Research Articles [Doctoral]. Australian National University.

Spillias, S., Tuohy, P., Andreotta, M., Annand-Jones, R., Boschetti, F., Cvitanovic, C., Duggan, J., Fulton, E., Karcher, D., Paris, C., Shellock, R., & Trebilco, R. (2023). Human-AI Collaboration to Identify Literature for Evidence Synthesis. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3099291/v1

Suzina, A. C. (2021). English as lingua franca. Or the sterilisation of scientific work. Media, Culture & Society, 43(1), 171-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720957906

Tello, A. (2023). Sobre el colonialismo digital: Datos, algoritmos y colonialidad tecnológica del poder en el sur global. InMediaciones de la Comunicación, 18(2), 89-110. https://doi.org/10.18861/ic.2023.18.2.3523

Verma, M. K., & Yuvaraj, M. (2023). AI-Based Literature Reviews: A Topic Modeling Approach. Journal of Information and Knowledge, 97-104. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2023/v60i2/170967

Downloads

Published

2024-08-30

How to Cite

Zermeño-Flores, A. I., Tufte, T., & Navarrete-Vega, M. A. (2024). Knowledge production and epistemic injustices: The use of digital technologies and artificial intelligence. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 40(76), 120–138. https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v40i76.143529

Issue

Vol. 40 No. 76 (2024): The Communicative Dynamics of AI

Section

Articles: Theme section

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Author and journal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright Author and Journal.
Articles published after January 1 2024 are licensed under CCBY 4.0.
Articles published until December 31 2023 are licensed under CCBYNCND.
Articles submitted to MedieKultur should not be submitted to or published in other journals.